pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12298 · v1 · pith:HCDHJNK6new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-ph

The KSVZ Atlas: A Unified SMEFT-ALP Framework

Ajdin Palavri\'c , Xavier Ponce D\'iaz , Hector Tiblom This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords SMEFTALPKSVZvector-like fermionsPQ symmetryglobal fitselectroweak precisionflavor observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

A matching framework connects arbitrary KSVZ ultraviolet completions to SMEFT operators and low-energy ALP theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a general procedure that takes KSVZ-style models with any vector-like fermion representations and PQ charge assignments and derives the full set of effective operators they produce in both the SMEFT and the ALP effective theory. Global fits to electroweak precision, Higgs, and flavor data then extract bounds on the resulting Wilson coefficients that hold across a wide range of ultraviolet details. These bounds are mapped into the QCD axion and ALP parameter space, revealing that indirect constraints from precision observables frequently dominate direct ALP searches except when the PQ charges allow mass mixing with Standard Model fermions. The work therefore supplies a single setting in which ultraviolet model building, precision constraints, and ALP phenomenology can be treated together.

Core claim

We develop a general framework for matching KSVZ-like ultraviolet completions featuring vector-like fermions and a spontaneously broken U(1)PQ symmetry onto the Standard Model Effective Field Theory and the low-energy axion-like particle effective theory. The framework applies to arbitrary vector-like fermion representations and PQ-charge assignments, and systematically captures the effective interactions generated in both sectors. Global fits to electroweak precision, Higgs, and flavor observables produce bounds on Wilson coefficients that are largely independent of the details of the ultraviolet realization and can be translated into the QCD axion and ALP parameter space.

What carries the argument

The systematic matching of KSVZ UV completions with arbitrary vector-like fermion representations and PQ charges onto SMEFT operators and ALP couplings.

If this is right

  • Precision and flavor bounds on SMEFT operators translate directly into limits on ALP couplings and masses.
  • Direct ALP searches and indirect constraints are complementary except when PQ charges permit fermion mass mixing.
  • The same ultraviolet dynamics can be tested through both collider precision measurements and dedicated ALP experiments.
  • Future signals in either sector can be interpreted within one consistent parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be used to prioritize ALP search strategies by first excluding regions already ruled out by precision data.
  • Similar matching methods might extend to other axion UV completions that also involve vector-like matter.
  • Regions where indirect bounds are weak could motivate dedicated direct searches even with current technology.

Load-bearing premise

Global fits to electroweak, Higgs, and flavor data produce Wilson-coefficient bounds that stay largely independent of ultraviolet details.

What would settle it

A explicit one-loop calculation in one concrete KSVZ model that produces Wilson coefficients lying well outside the global-fit bounds for the same low-energy parameters.

read the original abstract

We develop a general framework for matching KSVZ-like ultraviolet completions featuring vector-like fermions and a spontaneously broken $\mathrm{U}(1)_{\mathrm{PQ}}$ symmetry onto the Standard Model Effective Field Theory and the low-energy axion-like particle effective theory. The framework applies to arbitrary vector-like fermion representations and PQ-charge assignments, and systematically captures the effective interactions generated in both sectors. We then perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the resulting SMEFT operators, based on global fits to electroweak precision, Higgs, and flavor observables, obtaining robust bounds on the corresponding Wilson coefficients that are largely independent of the details of the ultraviolet realization. These constraints can subsequently be translated into the QCD axion and ALP parameter space, providing indirect probes of ALP couplings. We further investigate several representative examples of the interplay between the SMEFT and ALP sectors, illustrating how direct ALP searches and indirect precision and flavor observables provide complementary information on the same underlying dynamics. We find that, over large regions of parameter space, indirect constraints derived from the SMEFT analysis dominate over direct ALP probes, except in scenarios where the PQ-charge assignment permits mass mixing with Standard Model fermions. Overall, our results establish a unified framework for connecting ultraviolet completions, SMEFT analyses, and ALP searches, enabling both the interpretation of existing constraints and the exploration of future signals within a common theoretical setting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general matching framework from KSVZ-like UV completions (vector-like fermions with arbitrary representations and U(1)_PQ charges) onto SMEFT and low-energy ALP EFT. It performs global fits to electroweak precision, Higgs, and flavor data to extract bounds on the generated Wilson coefficients, asserts these bounds are largely independent of UV details, translates the constraints into ALP parameter space, and compares indirect SMEFT-derived limits against direct ALP searches, finding indirect bounds dominate except when PQ charges allow SM fermion mass mixing.

Significance. If the matching is complete for arbitrary representations and the claimed UV-independence of the Wilson-coefficient bounds is explicitly verified, the atlas would enable systematic interpretation of precision and flavor data as indirect ALP probes and provide a common language for UV model building and experimental searches.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that global-fit bounds on Wilson coefficients are 'largely independent of the details of the ultraviolet realization' is load-bearing for the subsequent translation to ALP space and the conclusion that indirect constraints dominate. Different vector-like representations and PQ assignments generate distinct linear combinations of operators (e.g., varying coefficients for O_{Hψ}, O_{φW}, and four-fermion terms); without an explicit demonstration—such as a comparison of fit likelihoods or extracted bounds across multiple representative choices—the independence does not automatically follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment concerns the need for explicit verification of the claimed UV-independence of the Wilson-coefficient bounds. We agree this point merits clarification and will revise the manuscript to address it directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that global-fit bounds on Wilson coefficients are 'largely independent of the details of the ultraviolet realization' is load-bearing for the subsequent translation to ALP space and the conclusion that indirect constraints dominate. Different vector-like representations and PQ assignments generate distinct linear combinations of operators (e.g., varying coefficients for O_{Hψ}, O_{φW}, and four-fermion terms); without an explicit demonstration—such as a comparison of fit likelihoods or extracted bounds across multiple representative choices—the independence does not automatically follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the central claim. Although the framework is constructed to accommodate arbitrary representations and the global fits are performed on the resulting operator coefficients, the manuscript does not currently include a side-by-side comparison of fit results across distinct UV realizations. In the revised version we will add a new subsection (or appendix) that presents the extracted bounds on the dominant Wilson coefficients for several representative choices of vector-like fermion representations and PQ charge assignments. This will include tables comparing the 95% CL limits obtained from the electroweak, Higgs, and flavor fits, thereby verifying that the leading constraints remain largely insensitive to the specific UV details except in the mass-mixing cases already highlighted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central bounds from external global fits

full rationale

The paper derives SMEFT operator bounds via global fits to electroweak precision, Higgs, and flavor observables, then translates those bounds into ALP parameter space. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a quantity defined in terms of itself by the paper's equations, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The asserted UV-independence is presented as an empirical outcome of the fits rather than a definitional or fitted-input feature. The derivation remains self-contained against external data benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the framework rests on standard EFT matching assumptions and the claim that bounds are largely UV-independent, but no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1130 out tokens · 24321 ms · 2026-06-27T09:04:49.883070+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 38 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    1979

  2. [2]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506. – 51 – 10710810910101011 fa [GeV] 10−1 100 101 −CHu [TeV−2] 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 [cauR]ij SN1987A Cap B→Kµ +µ− & EWPO Im xD 10−2 10−1 100 101 CHu [TeV−2] 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 ma [eV] 10−4 10−3 10−2 1...

    1980

  3. [3]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

    1978

  4. [4]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    1978

  5. [5]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  6. [6]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  7. [7]

    Di Luzio, S

    L. Di Luzio, S. Hoof, C. Marinissen and V. Plakkot,Catalogues of cosmologically self-consistent hadronic QCD axion models,JCAP04(2025) 072, [2412.17896]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Gavela, P

    B. Gavela, P. Quílez and M. Ramos,The QCD axion sum rule,JHEP04(2024) 056, [2305.15465]. – 52 –

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    de Giorgi and M

    A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos,Extra-dimensional axion patterns,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 075006, [2412.00179]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Fernández Navarro, M

    M. Fernández Navarro, M. F. Zamoro, M. Pesut and X. Ponce Díaz,The structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem,2605.06787

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    V. A. Rubakov,Grand unification and heavy axion,JETP Lett.65(1997) 621–624, [hep-ph/9703409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    M. B. Gavela, M. Ibe, P. Quilez and T. T. Yanagida,Automatic Peccei–Quinn symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 542, [1812.08174]

    arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Croon, R

    D. Croon, R. Houtz and V. Sanz,Dynamical Axions and Gravitational Waves,JHEP07 (2019) 146, [1904.10967]

    arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Reig,On the high-scale instanton interference effect: axion models without domain wall problem,JHEP08(2019) 167, [1901.00203]

    M. Reig,On the high-scale instanton interference effect: axion models without domain wall problem,JHEP08(2019) 167, [1901.00203]

    arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Gherghetta, N

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata and M. Shifman,A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 115010, [1604.01127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe,A Flavorful Factoring of the Strong CP Problem,JHEP12 (2018) 035, [1712.05803]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Fuentes-Martín, M

    J. Fuentes-Martín, M. Reig and A. Vicente,StrongCPproblem with low-energy emergent QCD: The 4321 case,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 115028, [1907.02550]

    arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez and A. Ringwald,Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalignment,JCAP10(2021) 001, [2102.01082]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez and A. Ringwald,An even lighter QCD axion,JHEP05 (2021) 184, [2102.00012]

    arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Jaeckel, M

    J. Jaeckel, M. Jankowiak and M. Spannowsky,LHC probes the hidden sector,Phys. Dark Univ.2(2013) 111–117, [1212.3620]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Mimasu and V

    K. Mimasu and V. Sanz,ALPs at Colliders,JHEP06(2015) 173, [1409.4792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Brivio, M

    I. Brivio, M. B. Gavela, L. Merlo, K. Mimasu, J. M. No, R. del Rey et al.,ALPs Effective Field Theory and Collider Signatures,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 572, [1701.05379]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm,LHC as an Axion Factory: Probing an Axion Explanation for(g−2) µ with Exotic Higgs Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 031802, [1704.08207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Heiles, M. Neubert and A. Thamm,Axion-Like Particles at Future Colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 74, [1808.10323]

    arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm,Flavor probes of axion-like particles,JHEP09(2022) 056, [2110.10698]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz and S. Rigolin,Comprehensive ALP Searches in Meson Decays,2507.19578

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199–202

    1981

  28. [28]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260. – 53 –

    1980

  29. [29]

    Di Luzio, A

    L. Di Luzio, A. W. M. Guerrera, X. P. Díaz and S. Rigolin,On the IR/UV flavour connection in non-universal axion models,JHEP06(2023) 046, [2304.04643]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277–298

    1979

  31. [31]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. Smolkovič and A. Valenti,Froggatt-Nielsen ALP,JHEP09(2024) 174, [2407.02998]

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Alonso-Álvarez, J

    G. Alonso-Álvarez, J. M. Cline and T. Xiao,The flavor of QCD axion dark matter,JHEP 07(2023) 187, [2305.00018]

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Gherardi, D

    V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia and A. Romanino,Rank-One Flavor Violation and B-meson anomalies,JHEP10(2019) 112, [1903.10954]

    arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Marzocca, M

    D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia, A. Stanzione and C. Toni,Implications ofB→Kν¯νunder rank-one flavor violation hypothesis,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1217, [2404.06533]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Biondini, A

    S. Biondini, A. Greljo, X. Ponce Díaz and A. Valenti,Charting the Flavour Structure of Dark Matter,2601.07921

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    de Blas, J

    J. de Blas, J. C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary,JHEP03(2018) 109, [1711.10391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1–117, [2003.01100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Grzadkowski, M

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [1008.4884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm,The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs,JHEP04(2021) 063, [2012.12272]

    arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Chala, G

    M. Chala, G. Guedes, M. Ramos and J. Santiago,Running in the ALPs,Eur. Phys. J. C 81(2021) 181, [2012.09017]

    arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Das Bakshi, J

    S. Das Bakshi, J. Machado-Rodríguez and M. Ramos,Running beyond ALPs: shift-breaking and CP-violating effects,JHEP11(2023) 133, [2306.08036]

    arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Smolkovič, M

    A. Smolkovič, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Anomaly free Froggatt-Nielsen models of flavor, JHEP10(2019) 188, [1907.10063]

    arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. Curtin, E. T. Neil and J. O. Thompson,Mapping and probing Froggatt-Nielsen solutions to the quark flavor puzzle,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015042, [2306.08026]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Loisa and J

    E. Loisa and J. Talbert,Froggatt-Nielsen meets the SMEFT,JHEP10(2024) 017, [2402.16940]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. Curtin, G. Krnjaic and M. Mellors,Testing the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism with lepton flavor and number violating processes,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 115010, [2501.00629]

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. Palavrić and B. A. Stefanek,Minimal Flavor Protection for TeV-scale New Physics,2512.04159

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    Arkani-Hamed, C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo, L. J. Hall and C. A. Manzari,Generating the fermion mass hierarchy at the TeV scale,2602.17754. – 54 –

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Calibbi and J

    L. Calibbi and J. Yi,Phenomenology of Non-Abelian Gauge and Goldstone Bosons in a U(2) Flavor Model,2511.10468

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. E. Thomsen and H. Tiblom,Flavor hierarchies from SU(2) flavor and quark-lepton unification,JHEP08(2024) 143, [2406.02687]

    arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Asadi, A

    P. Asadi, A. Bhattacharya, K. Fraser, S. Homiller and A. Parikh,Wrinkles in the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism and flavorful new physics,JHEP10(2023) 069, [2308.01340]

    arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Fedele, A

    M. Fedele, A. Mastroddi and M. Valli,Minimal Froggatt-Nielsen textures,JHEP03(2021) 135, [2009.05587]

    arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Calibbi, D

    L. Calibbi, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Looking forward to lepton-flavor-violating ALPs,JHEP09(2021) 173, [2006.04795]

    arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Bonnefoy, E

    Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas and S. Pokorski,Chiral Froggatt-Nielsen models, gauge anomalies and flavourful axions,JHEP01(2020) 191, [1909.05336]

    arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Giarnetti, S

    A. Giarnetti, S. Marciano, D. Meloni and M. Rettaroli,A roadmap for neutrino charge assignments in U(2)F flavor models: implications for LFV processes and leptonic anomalous magnetic moments,JHEP02(2026) 209, [2505.20281]

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Greljo and A

    A. Greljo and A. E. Thomsen,Rising through the ranks: flavor hierarchies from a gauged SU(2) symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 213, [2309.11547]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Mohanta and K

    G. Mohanta and K. M. Patel,Gauged SU(3)F and loop induced quark and lepton masses, JHEP10(2023) 128, [2308.05642]

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Mohanta and K

    G. Mohanta and K. M. Patel,Radiatively generated fermion mass hierarchy from flavor nonuniversal gauge symmetries,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 075020, [2207.10407]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Greljo and A

    A. Greljo and A. Palavrić,Leading directions in the SMEFT,2305.08898

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. Palavrić and A. Smolkovič,Leading directions in the SMEFT: Renormalization effects,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075033, [2312.09179]

    arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Palavrić,Discrete leptonic flavor symmetries: UV mediators and phenomenology,Phys

    A. Palavrić,Discrete leptonic flavor symmetries: UV mediators and phenomenology,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115025, [2408.16044]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Moreno-Sánchez and A

    A. Moreno-Sánchez and A. Palavrić,Leptonic flavor from a modular A4 symmetry: UV mediators and SMEFT realizations,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 075002, [2505.01535]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Košnik, A

    N. Košnik, A. Palavrić and A. Smolkovič,UV origins of CP-violating leptonic Yukawa couplings,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 095046, [2509.04325]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    A. B. Beneito, I, A. Palavrić and A. Sainaghi,Implications of flavor symmetries for baryon number violation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 055021, [2512.14813]

    arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Aebischer, J

    J. Aebischer, J. Kumar, P. Stangl and D. M. Straub,A Global Likelihood for Precision Constraints and Flavour Anomalies,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 509, [1810.07698]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    D. M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Harnik, J

    R. Harnik, J. Kopp and J. Zupan,Flavor Violating Higgs Decays,JHEP03(2013) 026, [1209.1397]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Falkowski, M

    A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and O. Naviliat-Cuncic,Comprehensive analysis of beta decays within and beyond the Standard Model,JHEP04(2021) 126, [2010.13797]. – 55 –

    arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    González-Alonso, O

    M. González-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns,New physics searches in nuclear and neutronβdecay,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104(2019) 165–223, [1803.08732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Alioli, V

    S. Alioli, V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries and E. Mereghetti,Right-handed charged currents in the era of the Large Hadron Collider,JHEP05(2017) 086, [1703.04751]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Falkowski, M

    A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, A. Palavrić and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez,Constraints on subleading interactions in beta decay Lagrangian,JHEP02(2024) 091, [2112.07688]

    arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [1310.4838]

    arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Alonso, E

    R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology,JHEP04(2014) 159, [1312.2014]

    arXiv 2014

  73. [73]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and P. Stoffer,Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching,JHEP03(2018) 016, [1709.04486]

    arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz and T. Rauh,∆Ms theory precision confronts flavour anomalies,JHEP12(2019) 009, [1909.11087]

    arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Silvestrini and M

    L. Silvestrini and M. Valli,Model-independent Bounds on the Standard Model Effective Theory from Flavour Physics,Phys. Lett. B799(2019) 135062, [1812.10913]

    arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Gargalionis, J

    J. Gargalionis, J. Quevillon, P. N. H. Vuong and T. You,Linear Standard Model extensions in the SMEFT at one loop and Tera-Z,2412.01759

    arXiv

  77. [77]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Co’, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi et al.,Getting the most on supernova axions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023001, [2306.01048]

    arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Martin Camalich, M

    J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 015023, [2002.04623]

    arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz and S. Rigolin,ALPaca: The ALP Automatic Computing Algorithm,2508.08354

    arXiv

  80. [80]

    Aloni, Y

    D. Aloni, Y. Soreq and M. Williams,Coupling QCD-Scale Axionlike Particles to Gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 031803, [1811.03474]

    arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.