pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13592 · v1 · pith:GLCZENVWnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Trapped Surface as a Cosmic Censor

Hideo Furugori , Daisuke Yoshida , Kaho Yoshimura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords cosmic censorshiptrapped surfacesblack hole overchargingnaked singularitiesReissner-NordströmKerr-Newmannull convergence conditiongeneral relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Matter injection converts a horizon cross-section into a closed trapped surface that rules out certain overcharged black holes and naked singularities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a local geometric criterion for weak cosmic censorship in overcharging and overspinning scenarios. Under the null convergence condition and generic conditions, injecting matter into a black hole turns a horizon cross-section into a closed trapped surface. Any final spacetime that cannot contain this surface is therefore forbidden as a possible outcome. The criterion excludes superextremal Reissner-Nordström, Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter, and Kerr-Newman states along with Weyl-class naked singularities. It operates without reference to asymptotic charges or extremality conditions that usually characterize naked singularities.

Core claim

Under the null convergence and generic conditions, matter injection turns a horizon cross section into a closed trapped surface. Any final spacetime unable to accommodate this surface is ruled out. This trapped surface criterion excludes superextremal Reissner-Nordström, Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter, and Kerr-Newman final states, as well as Weyl-class naked singularities. The criterion does not rely on asymptotic charges or on an extremal condition characterizing naked singularities.

What carries the argument

The closed trapped surface obtained by converting a horizon cross-section through matter injection, which functions as a local geometric test for whether a spacetime can serve as a valid final state under weak cosmic censorship.

If this is right

  • Superextremal Reissner-Nordström spacetimes are ruled out as possible final states.
  • Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter and Kerr-Newman final states cannot occur.
  • Weyl-class naked singularities are excluded.
  • The test applies to overcharging and overspinning thought experiments without using global charges.
  • It provides a local criterion independent of extremality conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical simulations of matter infall could directly check whether a trapped surface forms and thereby test the censorship outcome.
  • The approach shifts emphasis from global conserved quantities to the local geometry of trapped surfaces.
  • The same logic might extend to dynamical horizons or to spacetimes in modified gravity theories.
  • It could connect to existing singularity theorems by supplying a concrete mechanism that forces trapped surfaces during evolution.

Load-bearing premise

That matter injection under the null convergence condition and generic conditions necessarily turns a horizon cross-section into a closed trapped surface.

What would settle it

An explicit example of matter injection into a horizon cross-section that fails to produce a closed trapped surface while obeying the null convergence condition, or a spacetime that contains such a surface yet permits a naked singularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13592 by Daisuke Yoshida, Hideo Furugori, Kaho Yoshimura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The setup of the overcharging/overspinning thought [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We formulate a local geometric criterion for weak cosmic censorship in black hole overcharging and overspinning thought experiments. Under the null convergence and generic conditions, matter injection turns a horizon cross section into a closed trapped surface. Any final spacetime unable to accommodate this surface is ruled out. This trapped surface criterion excludes superextremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om, Reissner-Nordstr\"om-de Sitter, and Kerr-Newman final states, as well as Weyl-class naked singularities. Our criterion does not rely on asymptotic charges or on an extremal condition characterizing naked singularities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a local geometric criterion for weak cosmic censorship applicable to black-hole overcharging and overspinning thought experiments. Under the null convergence condition and generic conditions, matter injection is asserted to convert a horizon cross-section into a closed trapped surface; any candidate final spacetime unable to contain such a surface is thereby ruled out. The criterion is used to exclude superextremal Reissner-Nordström, Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter, and Kerr-Newman geometries as well as Weyl-class naked singularities, and is stated to be independent of asymptotic charges and extremality conditions.

Significance. If the central conversion step is rigorously established, the result supplies a charge-independent, purely local test for cosmic censorship that relies only on standard null-convergence and genericness assumptions. This would strengthen existing arguments against certain naked-singularity candidates by showing that they cannot accommodate the trapped surface produced by horizon perturbation, without invoking global conserved quantities.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the claim that 'matter injection turns a horizon cross section into a closed trapped surface' under the null convergence and generic conditions is the load-bearing step for all subsequent exclusions, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation of this conversion. The steps that show how the cross-section becomes trapped while preserving the null convergence condition must be supplied before the exclusions of superextremal RN, RNdS, overspun KN, and Weyl naked singularities can be assessed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need to make the central conversion step fully explicit. We agree that this derivation is essential for assessing the subsequent exclusions and will supply it in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the claim that 'matter injection turns a horizon cross section into a closed trapped surface' under the null convergence and generic conditions is the load-bearing step for all subsequent exclusions, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation of this conversion. The steps that show how the cross-section becomes trapped while preserving the null convergence condition must be supplied before the exclusions of superextremal RN, RNdS, overspun KN, and Weyl naked singularities can be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the conversion from horizon cross-section to closed trapped surface is required. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated section (or appendix) that derives this step from the Raychaudhuri equation applied to the perturbed generators, using the null convergence condition to obtain focusing and the generic condition to ensure the surface is closed and trapped. The argument will be written so that the null convergence condition is preserved at every stage. With this addition the exclusions of the listed final states can be re-examined on a fully rigorous footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard GR conditions

full rationale

The paper's central claim formulates a trapped-surface criterion under the null convergence condition and generic conditions (standard, externally verifiable assumptions in general relativity) to rule out certain final spacetimes by their inability to contain the surface produced by matter injection. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the exclusions follow from the listed spacetimes' known geometric properties (absence of horizons or trapped surfaces), and the criterion is stated to be independent of asymptotic charges. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the null convergence condition and generic conditions, both standard domain assumptions in GR focusing theorems; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption null convergence condition
    Invoked to guarantee that matter injection produces a closed trapped surface (abstract).
  • domain assumption generic conditions
    Required to ensure the horizon cross-section becomes trapped (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5619 in / 1409 out tokens · 25665 ms · 2026-06-27T05:57:37.301097+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 20 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cim.1, 252 (1969)

    1969

  2. [2]

    Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals Phys.82, 548 (1974)

    R. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals Phys.82, 548 (1974)

    1974

  3. [3]

    J. M. Cohen and R. Gautreau, Naked singularities, event horizons, and charged particles, Phys. Rev. D19, 2273 (1979)

    1979

  4. [4]

    Needham, COSMIC CENSORSHIP AND TEST PARTICLES, Phys

    T. Needham, COSMIC CENSORSHIP AND TEST PARTICLES, Phys. Rev. D22, 791 (1980)

    1980

  5. [5]

    W. A. Hiscock, Magnetic charge, black holes, and cosmic censorship, Annals of Physics131, 245 (1981)

    1981

  6. [6]

    Gwak and B.-H

    B. Gwak and B.-H. Lee, Cosmic Censorship of Ro- tating Anti-de Sitter Black Hole, JCAP02, 015, arXiv:1509.06691 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    D¨ uzta¸ s, Overspinning BTZ black holes with test particles and fields, Phys

    K. D¨ uzta¸ s, Overspinning BTZ black holes with test particles and fields, Phys. Rev. D94, 124031 (2016), arXiv:1701.07241 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Ghosh, C

    R. Ghosh, C. Fairoos, and S. Sarkar, Overcharging higher curvature black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 124019 (2019), arXiv:1906.08016 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    S.-J. Yang, J. Chen, J.-J. Wan, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a Kerr-Taub-NUT black hole with a test scalar field and particle, Phys. Rev. D101, 064048 (2020), arXiv:2001.03106 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Izumi, T

    K. Izumi, T. Noumi, and D. Yoshida, Gedanken experi- ments to destroy a black hole by a test particle: Multi- ply charged black hole with higher derivative corrections, Phys. Rev. D110, 044008 (2024), arXiv:2403.11488 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    V. E. Hubeny, Overcharging a black hole and cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D59, 064013 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9808043

    arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    de Felice and Y.-Q

    F. de Felice and Y.-Q. Yu, Turning a black hole into a naked singularity, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 1235 (2001)

    2001

  13. [13]

    Hod, Cosmic censorship, area theorem, and selfenergy of particles, Phys

    S. Hod, Cosmic censorship, area theorem, and selfenergy of particles, Phys. Rev. D66, 024016 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0205005

    arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Jacobson and T

    T. Jacobson and T. P. Sotiriou, Over-spinning a black hole with a test body, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 141101 (2009), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 103, 209903 (2009)], arXiv:0907.4146 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    Chirco, S

    G. Chirco, S. Liberati, and T. P. Sotiriou, Gedanken ex- periments on nearly extremal black holes and the Third Law, Phys. Rev. D82, 104015 (2010), arXiv:1006.3655 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Saa and R

    A. Saa and R. Santarelli, Destroying a near-extremal Kerr-Newman black hole, Phys. Rev. D84, 027501 (2011), arXiv:1105.3950 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Gao and Y

    S. Gao and Y. Zhang, Destroying extremal Kerr-Newman black holes with test particles, Phys. Rev. D87, 044028 (2013), arXiv:1211.2631 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Sorce and R

    J. Sorce and R. M. Wald, Gedanken experiments to de- stroy a black hole. II. Kerr-Newman black holes cannot be overcharged or overspun, Phys. Rev. D96, 104014 (2017), arXiv:1707.05862 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    J. An, J. Shan, H. Zhang, and S. Zhao, Five- dimensional Myers-Perry black holes cannot be over- spun in gedanken experiments, Phys. Rev. D97, 104007 (2018), arXiv:1711.04310 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    B. Ge, Y. Mo, S. Zhao, and J. Zheng, Higher- dimensional charged black holes cannot be over-charged by gedanken experiments, Phys. Lett. B783, 440 (2018), arXiv:1712.07342 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    D¨ uzta¸ s, M

    K. D¨ uzta¸ s, M. Jamil, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahmedov, Testing cosmic censorship conjecture for extremal and near-extremal (2 + 1)-dimensional MTZ black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 175005 (2020), arXiv:1808.04711 [gr-qc]. 8

    arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Chen, F.-L

    B. Chen, F.-L. Lin, and B. Ning, Gedanken Experiments to Destroy a BTZ Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D100, 044043 (2019), arXiv:1902.00949 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, B. Ahmedov, and M. Jamil, Five dimensional charged rotating minimally gauged su- pergravity black hole cannot be over-spun and/or over- charged in non-linear accretion, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 481 (2020), arXiv:1908.01195 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, and B. Ahmedov, Six- dimensional Myers-Perry rotating black hole cannot be overspun, Phys. Rev. D101, 044028 (2020), arXiv:1908.07799 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Jiang, B

    J. Jiang, B. Deng, and Z. Chen, Static charged dila- ton black hole cannot be overcharged by gedanken experiments, Phys. Rev. D100, 066024 (2019), arXiv:1909.02219 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Jiang, X

    J. Jiang, X. Liu, and M. Zhang, Examining the weak cos- mic censorship conjecture by gedanken experiments for Kerr-Sen black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 084059 (2019), arXiv:1910.04060 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Wang and J

    X.-Y. Wang and J. Jiang, Examining the weak cosmic censorship conjecture of RN-AdS black holes via the new version of the gedanken experiment, JCAP07, 052, arXiv:1911.03938 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1911

  28. [28]

    He and J

    Y.-L. He and J. Jiang, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 124060 (2019), arXiv:1912.05217 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Jiang, Static charged Gauss-Bonnet black holes can- not be overcharged by the new version of gedanken experiments, Phys

    J. Jiang, Static charged Gauss-Bonnet black holes can- not be overcharged by the new version of gedanken experiments, Phys. Lett. B804, 135365 (2020), arXiv:1912.10826 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Jiang and M

    J. Jiang and M. Zhang, Weak cosmic censorship conjec- ture in Einstein–Maxwell gravity with scalar hair, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 196 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    Jiang and Y

    J. Jiang and Y. Gao, Investigating the gedanken experi- ment to destroy the event horizon of a regular black hole, Phys. Rev. D101, 084005 (2020), arXiv:2003.07501 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Wang and J

    X.-Y. Wang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high-order approximation: nearly extremal Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black holes cannot be overcharged, JHEP05, 161, arXiv:2004.12120 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Shaymatov and N

    S. Shaymatov and N. Dadhich, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in the pure Lovelock gravity, JCAP10, 060, arXiv:2008.04092 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Jiang and M

    J. Jiang and M. Zhang, Testing the Weak Cosmic Censor- ship Conjecture in Lanczos-Lovelock gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084033 (2020), arXiv:2008.04906 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Qu, S.-J

    F. Qu, S.-J. Yang, Z. Wang, and J.-R. Ren, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture is not violated for a rotating linear dilaton black hole, (2020), arXiv:2008.09950 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Jiang and M

    J. Jiang and M. Zhang, New version of the gedanken ex- periments to test the weak cosmic censorship in charged dilaton-Lifshitz black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 822 (2020), arXiv:2008.12415 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Zhang and J

    M. Zhang and J. Jiang, New gedanken experiment on higher-dimensional asymptotically AdS Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 890 (2020), arXiv:2009.07681 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Z. Li, Y. Gao, and X.-K. Guo, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in higher-dimensional black holes with nonlin- ear electrodynamic sources, Phys. Lett. B817, 136303 (2021), arXiv:2009.09385 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Ding and X.-H

    H.-F. Ding and X.-H. Zhai, Examining the weak cosmic censorship conjecture by gedanken experiments for an Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton–Axion black hole, Mod. Phys. Lett. A35, 2050335 (2020), arXiv:2012.06120 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    D¨ uzta¸ s, The variational method, backreactions, and the absorption probability in Wald type problems, Eur

    K. D¨ uzta¸ s, The variational method, backreactions, and the absorption probability in Wald type problems, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 49 (2021), arXiv:2101.07790 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Y. Qu, J. Tao, and J. Wu, New Gedanken experiment on RN-AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 185 (2022), arXiv:2103.09183 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Sang and J

    A. Sang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high- order approximation: Kerr black hole cannot be over- spun, JHEP09, 095, arXiv:2108.03454 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Huang, Y

    Y.-M. Huang, Y. Tian, X.-N. Wu, and H. Zhang, The topological RN-AdS black holes cannot be overcharged by the new version of gedanken experiment, Phys. Lett. B829, 137031 (2022), arXiv:2203.00988 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Sang and J

    A. Sang and J. Jiang, Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjec- ture of Hairy Black Holes in Einstein Gravity, (2022), arXiv:2206.04410 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    A. K. Ahmed, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahmedov, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture for the (2+1)- dimensional charged BTZ black hole in the Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.37, 101082 (2022), arXiv:2207.01694 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Wang and J

    X.-Y. Wang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high- order approximations: Kerr-Newman black hole cannot be overcharged and overspun, Phys. Rev. D106, 064050 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Jiang, Testing the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in the massive gravitational theories, Nucl

    J. Jiang, Testing the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in the massive gravitational theories, Nucl. Phys. B984, 115963 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Yang, W.-D

    S.-J. Yang, W.-D. Guo, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, First law of black hole thermodynamics and the weak cosmic censorship conjecture for Kerr–Newman Taub–NUT black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1111 (2023), arXiv:2306.05266 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    D¨ uzta¸ s, Spin-2 fields and cosmic censorship, Phys

    K. D¨ uzta¸ s, Spin-2 fields and cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D110, 024081 (2024), arXiv:2403.15830 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Yoshida and K

    D. Yoshida and K. Yoshimura, The first law and weak cosmic censorship for de Sitter black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 115008 (2025), arXiv:2411.19535 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    1965

  52. [52]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Struc- ture of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  54. [54]

    Claudel, Black holes and closed trapped sur- faces: A Revision of a classic theorem, (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/0005031

    C.-M. Claudel, Black holes and closed trapped sur- faces: A Revision of a classic theorem, (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/0005031

    arXiv 2000

  55. [55]

    Mars and J

    M. Mars and J. M. M. Senovilla, Trapped surfaces and symmetries, Class. Quant. Grav.20, L293 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0309055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Penrose,Techniques of differential topology in rela- tivity(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA, 1972)

    R. Penrose,Techniques of differential topology in rela- tivity(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA, 1972)

    1972

  57. [57]

    Hollands, A

    S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and R. M. Wald, A Higher di- mensional stationary rotating black hole must be axisym- metric, Commun. Math. Phys.271, 699 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0605106

    arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald, Stability of Black Holes and Black Branes, Commun. Math. Phys.321, 629 (2013), arXiv:1201.0463 [gr-qc]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    H. E. J. Curzon, Cylindrical solutions of einstein’s gravi- tation equations, Proceedings of the London Mathemat- ical Societys2-23, 477 (1925)

    1925

  60. [60]

    Chazy, Sur le champ de gravitation de deux masses fixes dans la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e , Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France52, 17 (1924)

    J. Chazy, Sur le champ de gravitation de deux masses fixes dans la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e , Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France52, 17 (1924)

    1924

  61. [61]

    D. M. Zipoy, Topology of Some Spheroidal Metrics, J. Math. Phys.7, 1137 (1966)

    1966

  62. [62]

    B. H. Voorhees, Static axially symmetric gravitational fields, Phys. Rev. D2, 2119 (1970)

    1970

  63. [63]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky,Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Saito and D

    D. Saito and D. Yoshida, Removing naked singulari- ties in static axially symmetric spacetimes by patching with flat spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D111, 024031 (2025), arXiv:2409.18520 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Emparan and H

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, A Rotating black ring so- lution in five-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 101101 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0110260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  66. [66]

    Izumi, Orthogonal black di-ring solution, Prog

    K. Izumi, Orthogonal black di-ring solution, Prog. Theor. Phys.119, 757 (2008), arXiv:0712.0902 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    H. K. Kunduri and J. Lucietti, Supersymmetric Black Holes with Lens-Space Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 211101 (2014), arXiv:1408.6083 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Tomizawa and M

    S. Tomizawa and M. Nozawa, Supersymmetric black lenses in five dimensions, Phys. Rev. D94, 044037 (2016), arXiv:1606.06643 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    Emparan and H

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Black Holes in Higher Di- mensions, Living Rev. Rel.11, 6 (2008), arXiv:0801.3471 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    Hollands and A

    S. Hollands and A. Ishibashi, Black hole uniqueness the- orems in higher dimensional spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 163001 (2012), arXiv:1206.1164 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  71. [71]

    R. M. Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D10, 1680 (1974)

    1974

  72. [72]

    F. J. Ernst, Black holes in a magnetic universe, J. Math. Phys.17, 54 (1976)

    1976

  73. [73]

    F. J. Ernst and W. J. Wild, Kerr black holes in a mag- netic universe, J. Math. Phys.17, 182 (1976)

    1976

  74. [74]

    Aliev and D

    A. Aliev and D. Gal’Tsov, Energetics of magnetized black holes: effective ergospheres and superradiance, Astro- physics and space science143, 301 (1988)

    1988

  75. [75]

    A. N. Aliev and D. V. Galtsov, Exact Solutions For Magnetized Black Holes, Astrophys. Space Sci.155, 181 (1989)

    1989

  76. [76]

    G. W. Gibbons, A. H. Mujtaba, and C. N. Pope, Er- goregions in Magnetised Black Hole Spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 125008 (2013), arXiv:1301.3927 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  77. [77]

    Podolsky and H

    J. Podolsky and H. Ovcharenko, Kerr Black Hole in a Uniform Bertotti-Robinson Magnetic Field: An Ex- act Solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 181401 (2025), arXiv:2507.05199 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Ovcharenko and J

    H. Ovcharenko and J. Podolsk´ y, New class of rotat- ing charged black holes with nonaligned electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D112, 064076 (2025), arXiv:2508.04850 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Bousso, Z

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D93, 064044 (2016), arXiv:1506.02669 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    A. C. Wall, A Second Law for Higher Curvature Gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1544014 (2015), arXiv:1504.08040 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.