pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13661 · v1 · pith:QOBQGNLLnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Robust Control of ECH Deposition Profiles on DIII-D

A. Rothstein , H.J. Farre-Kaga , K. Yasoda , J. Lestz , N. Chen , S.K. Kim , A. Jalalvand , E. Kolemen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords electron cyclotron heatingtokamak controlreal-time optimizationneural network surrogateDIII-Dgenetic algorithmgyrotronsdeposition profile
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ECHO algorithm uses a neural network surrogate of TORBEAM and a genetic optimizer to set gyrotron angles and powers for target ECH deposition profiles in real time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes development of the ECH Optimization (ECHO) algorithm that selects mirror angles and power levels for multiple gyrotrons to produce a desired radial heating profile. The method replaces full ray-tracing calculations with a fast neural-network model and applies a genetic search to find settings that can be updated during a plasma shot. The system was run on the DIII-D tokamak and continued to produce usable profiles even after some gyrotrons failed or the plasma parameters shifted. Measurements of electron cyclotron emission and later offline ray-tracing checks confirmed that the delivered profiles stayed close to the targets.

Core claim

The central claim is that a parallelized neural-network surrogate of the TORBEAM code, paired with a genetic optimizer, can determine optimal gyrotron mirror angles and powers fast enough for real-time use, and that this combination remains reliable when individual gyrotrons are lost or plasma conditions vary, as shown by direct ECE measurements and post-shot ray-tracing validation on DIII-D.

What carries the argument

The ECHO algorithm, which combines a neural-network surrogate of TORBEAM ray tracing with a genetic optimizer to choose gyrotron settings.

If this is right

  • The algorithm can update ECH settings within a single plasma discharge without waiting for full physics simulations.
  • Control remains possible even if one or more gyrotrons stop working during the shot.
  • The same surrogate-plus-optimizer structure could be applied to other tokamak actuators once suitable fast models exist.
  • Real-time profile targeting becomes practical for routine use in scenario development and stability control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Surrogate accuracy could be monitored in real time by occasional full TORBEAM calls to detect when retraining is needed.
  • The approach might extend to joint optimization of ECH with other heating systems if cross-system surrogates are developed.
  • Integration with existing plasma control systems could allow automatic adjustment of multiple actuators toward a single target profile.

Load-bearing premise

The neural-network surrogate of TORBEAM remains accurate enough across the plasma conditions and gyrotron states that occur in the experiment for the optimizer to find usable solutions.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the deposition profile measured by ECE after ECHO settings are applied deviates from the target profile by more than the experimental tolerance, even when full TORBEAM calculations are rerun with the same settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13661 by A. Jalalvand, A. Rothstein, E. Kolemen, H.J. Farre-Kaga, J. Lestz, K. Yasoda, N. Chen, S.K. Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Example ECH ray trace for a given DIII-D equilibria for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Overview of the ECHO algorithm. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. True (horizontal axis) versus predicted values (vertical axis) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. DIII-D shot 205902 presents the power deposition profiles extracted from ECE compared to target and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. DIII-D shot 205838 demonstrates the flexibility of ECHO, achieving multiple targets rapidly by controlling five gyrotrons. In plots on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. DIII-D shot 205907 demonstrates ECH Optimization for a vertically moving plasma with a constant deposition profile target. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. DIII-D shot 205905 where changes to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Fault handling demonstration in DIII-D shot 205907. When gyrotron 5 (green) is lost, it opens a gap in the ECH deposition profile. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. DIII-D shot 205902 power deposition profiles extracted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electron Cyclotron Heating (ECH) is a key actuator in DIII-D and future tokamaks that provides auxiliary heating, localized current drive for scenario development and MHD stability, and even impurity pump-out. Due to its control flexibility and applications, a gyrotron optimization algorithm was developed to multitask and fine-tune the deposition location and heating power of each gyrotron while providing robustness to hardware failure. The ECH Optimization (ECHO) algorithm finds the optimal gyrotron mirror angle and power to achieve a target ECH radial deposition profile. This optimization is accomplished in real-time using a parallelized neural network surrogate of the TORBEAM code combined with a genetic optimizer. This has been deployed in a DIII-D experiment and has been validated with experimental ECE measurements and post-experiment offline ray tracing, showing the algorithm's reliability despite gyrotron failures and significant changes to plasma parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the ECH Optimization (ECHO) algorithm for real-time control of electron cyclotron heating (ECH) deposition profiles on DIII-D. ECHO employs a parallelized neural-network surrogate of the TORBEAM ray-tracing code together with a genetic optimizer to determine optimal gyrotron mirror angles and power levels that match a target radial deposition profile. The system was deployed in DIII-D experiments and validated using experimental ECE measurements plus post-shot offline TORBEAM runs, with claims of robustness to gyrotron failures and plasma-parameter changes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a concrete demonstration of real-time, failure-tolerant ECH control in an operating tokamak, which is directly relevant to scenario development and MHD control in present and future devices. The experimental deployment itself constitutes a strength, as does the integration of a neural-network surrogate for computational speed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section describing the neural-network surrogate and its training/validation] The reliability of the genetic optimizer depends on the neural-network surrogate of TORBEAM producing deposition profiles accurate enough to distinguish usable from unusable mirror-angle/power commands. No quantitative surrogate validation metrics (e.g., RMS error in deposition location or power, maximum peak-shift error, or accuracy stratified by plasma density, temperature, and gyrotron on/off states) are supplied for the range of conditions encountered in the experiment.
  2. [Results section on experimental deployment and validation] The experimental validation (ECE + post-experiment TORBEAM) confirms only the final deployed outcome. The manuscript does not report a direct comparison between the surrogate predictions used by the optimizer at run time and the corresponding TORBEAM evaluations for the same commands, nor does it quantify how any surrogate error propagated into the achieved deposition profiles.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the algorithm shows 'reliability despite gyrotron failures' without accompanying numerical measures (e.g., fraction of shots meeting target profile within a stated tolerance, or profile-matching error statistics under failure conditions).
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether plotted deposition profiles are surrogate predictions, experimental ECE inversions, or offline TORBEAM results, and should include uncertainty bands where available.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript describing the ECHO algorithm. The comments highlight important aspects of surrogate validation that were not sufficiently quantified in the original submission. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section describing the neural-network surrogate and its training/validation] The reliability of the genetic optimizer depends on the neural-network surrogate of TORBEAM producing deposition profiles accurate enough to distinguish usable from unusable mirror-angle/power commands. No quantitative surrogate validation metrics (e.g., RMS error in deposition location or power, maximum peak-shift error, or accuracy stratified by plasma density, temperature, and gyrotron on/off states) are supplied for the range of conditions encountered in the experiment.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics for the neural-network surrogate were omitted from the original manuscript. The surrogate was trained and tested offline on a broad dataset spanning the plasma conditions and gyrotron configurations relevant to the DIII-D experiments. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection reporting RMS errors in deposition location and power, maximum peak-shift errors, and performance stratified by density, temperature, and gyrotron on/off states. These metrics will be computed on the held-out validation set and will directly address the referee's concern about the surrogate's ability to support reliable optimization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on experimental deployment and validation] The experimental validation (ECE + post-experiment TORBEAM) confirms only the final deployed outcome. The manuscript does not report a direct comparison between the surrogate predictions used by the optimizer at run time and the corresponding TORBEAM evaluations for the same commands, nor does it quantify how any surrogate error propagated into the achieved deposition profiles.

    Authors: The primary validation presented was end-to-end, using independent ECE measurements and offline TORBEAM runs on the final commands. We acknowledge that a direct, shot-by-shot comparison between the real-time surrogate outputs and TORBEAM for the exact commands issued during the experiment was not included. In the revision we will add this comparison for the presented discharges, together with a brief propagation analysis showing the impact of any surrogate discrepancies on the achieved deposition profiles. This will be performed by re-evaluating the optimized mirror angles and powers with the full TORBEAM code. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on experimental deployment and external validation

full rationale

The paper presents an engineering control algorithm (ECHO) that combines a neural-network surrogate of TORBEAM with a genetic optimizer, then reports its real-time deployment on DIII-D with validation via ECE diagnostics and offline TORBEAM ray tracing. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps are described. The central reliability claim is grounded in hardware-in-the-loop testing under varying plasma conditions and gyrotron failures, not in any equation that reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim implicitly assumes the surrogate model is sufficiently faithful and that the genetic optimizer reaches an acceptable solution in the allotted time.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5709 in / 1185 out tokens · 25450 ms · 2026-06-27T05:03:43.010284+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2018 , pages =

    Computer Physics Communications , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.018 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.018 2018

  2. [2]

    Nature , author =

    A sustained high-temperature fusion plasma regime facilitated by fast ions , volume =. Nature , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05008-1 , language =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05008-1 2022

  3. [3]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    External heating and current drive source requirements towards steady-state operation in. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073007 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073007 2014

  4. [4]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Overview of the. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac1654 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac1654 2022

  5. [5]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Overview of the. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.040 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.040 2011

  6. [6]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Electron cyclotron heating and current drive in. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/37/1/I06 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/37/1/i06 1997

  7. [7]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , author =

    Status and. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TPS.2020.2978828 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/tps.2020.2978828 2020

  8. [8]

    2024 , pages =

    EPJ Web of Conferences , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431302006 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431302006 2024

  9. [9]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    The design of an. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/43/11/020 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/43/11/020 2003

  10. [10]

    Leuterer and S

    F. Leuterer and S. Günter and M. Maraschek and F. Ryter and W. Suttrop and R. Wolf and G. Gantenbein and H. Zohm , keywords =. ECRH experiments in ASDEX upgrade , journal =. 2001 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00504-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(00)00504-4 2001

  11. [11]

    Plasma Science and Technology , author =

    Development and. Plasma Science and Technology , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/19 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/19 2016

  12. [12]

    and Starnella, G

    Neutral beam injection for fusion reactors: technological constraints versus functional requirements , volume =. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac227a , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac227a 2021

  13. [13]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Operation of the negative ion-based neutral beam injection system during. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00344-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(01)00344-1 2001

  14. [14]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Operation of the negative-ion based. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0920-3796(98)00183-5 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(98)00183-5 1998

  15. [15]

    Simulation and experiment of

    Choi, W and Baek, S G and Zhang, B and Bonoli, P T and Ding, S and Garofalo, A and Gong, X and Huang, J and Li, M and Lin, S Y and Qian, J and Wallace, G M , year =. Simulation and experiment of

  16. [16]

    2007 , pages =

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.13182/FST07-A1498 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.13182/fst07-a1498 2007

  17. [17]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Design of a limiter for the. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.257 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.257 2005

  18. [18]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Progress in. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 1993 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/35/SA/005 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/35/sa/005 1993

  19. [19]

    EPJ Web of Conferences , author =

    High. EPJ Web of Conferences , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201715702012 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201715702012 2017

  20. [20]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    High field side. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.12.078 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.12.078 2019

  21. [21]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    High-field side scrape-off layer density profile measurements and implications for high-field side. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ade6a8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ade6a8 2025

  22. [22]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Progress in. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/47/12B/S26 , language =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/47/12b/s26 2005

  23. [23]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Predictive multi-channel flux-driven modelling to optimise. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab833f , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab833f 2020

  24. [24]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Assessment of the. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad9e73 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad9e73 2025

  25. [25]

    and Benjamin, S.S

    Rutherford, G. and Benjamin, S.S. and La Haye, R.J. and Rothstein, A. and Wukitch, S.J. , title =. 2025 , journal =

    2025

  26. [26]

    1997 , month =

    Prater, R and Grunloh, H J and Moeller, C P and Doane, J L and Olstad, R A and Makowski, M A and Harvey, R W , title =. 1997 , month =

    1997

  27. [27]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Multi-frequency, megawatt-power gyrotron to facilitate a wide range of operations at. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/accdeb , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/accdeb 2023

  28. [28]

    The ITER magnet system , journal =

    M Huguet , abstract =. The ITER magnet system , journal =. 1997 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(97)00009-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(97)00009-4 1997

  29. [29]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Control of. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/3/010 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/3/010 2007

  30. [30]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    On the requirements to control neoclassical tearing modes in burning plasmas , volume =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/2/025002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/2/025002 2010

  31. [31]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Real-time mirror steering for improved closed loop neoclassical tearing mode suppression by electron cyclotron current drive in. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.168 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.168 2013

  32. [32]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Plasma start-up results with electron cyclotron assisted breakdown on. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073042 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073042 2011

  33. [33]

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =

    Plasma. Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.13182/FST10-A9266 , language =

    work page doi:10.13182/fst10-a9266 2010

  34. [34]

    2024 , pages =

    Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8c62 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8c62 2024

  35. [35]

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =

    Recent. Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.13182/FST11-A11695 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.13182/fst11-a11695 2011

  36. [36]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Active control of. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/018 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/018 2005

  37. [37]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Integrated real-time control of. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/52/7/074001 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/52/7/074001 2012

  38. [38]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Integrated current profile, normalized beta and. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.022 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.022 2019

  39. [39]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Effects of edge-localized electron cyclotron current drive on edge-localized mode suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations in. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad2ca8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad2ca8 2024

  40. [40]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Access to stable, high pressure tokamak pedestals using local electron cyclotron current drive , volume =. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad0fbe , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad0fbe 2024

  41. [41]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Particle transport with high power central. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/9/311 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/9/311 2001

  42. [42]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Experimental study on density pump-out due to electron cyclotron heating in the compact helical system heliotron - torsatron , volume =. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0920-3796(94)00182-7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/0920-3796(94)00182-7 1995

  43. [43]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Understanding. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa7f99 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa7f99 2017

  44. [44]

    Physics of Plasmas , author =

    Observation of the. Physics of Plasmas , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4983626 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4983626 2017

  45. [45]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Interplay between central. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/11/113029 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/11/113029 2015

  46. [46]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Simulation of the time behaviour of impurities in. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/45/12/003 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/45/12/003 2003

  47. [47]

    LUCE , title =

    T.C. LUCE , title =. Electron Cyclotron Emission and Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (EC-16) , chapter =. doi:10.1142/9789814340274_0002 , URL =. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789814340274_0002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814340274_0002

  48. [48]

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =

    Noninductive. Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.13182/FST02-A228 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.13182/fst02-a228 2002

  49. [49]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Assessment of current drive efficiency and the synergetic effect for. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/1/015002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/1/015002 2008

  50. [50]

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =

    Current. Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.13182/FST06-5 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.13182/fst06-5 2006

  51. [51]

    Wesson, John and Campbell, D. J. , year =. Tokamaks , isbn =

  52. [52]

    EPJ Web of Conferences , author =

    A model of multi-pass absorption of external. EPJ Web of Conferences , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1051/epjconf/20158703005 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/20158703005 2015

  53. [53]

    Farina, D and Poli, E and Figini, L and Maj, O and Mariani, A and Weber, H and Goodman, T and Sauter, O and Cavinato, M and Saibene, G and Henderson, M , journal =

  54. [54]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , author =

    Crucial issues of multi-beam feed-back control with. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/25/1/027 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/25/1/027 2005

  55. [55]

    Fusion Science and Technology , author =

    Surrogate. Fusion Science and Technology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1080/15361055.2025.2476829 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1080/15361055.2025.2476829 2025

  56. [56]

    2025 , pages =

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/add08b , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/add08b 2025

  57. [57]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035006 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035006 2008

  58. [58]

    Vu and P.C

    A.T. Vu and P.C. Progress in the ITER Plasma Control System design , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115501 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115501 2026

  59. [59]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , volume =. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/38/7/308 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/38/7/308 1998

  60. [60]

    Machine learning-based real-time kinetic profile reconstruction in

    Shousha, Ricardo and Seo, Jaemin and Erickson, Keith and Xing, Zichuan and Kim, SangKyeun and Abbate, Joseph and Kolemen, Egemen , year =. Machine learning-based real-time kinetic profile reconstruction in. Nuclear Fusion , publisher =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad142f , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad142f

  61. [61]

    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , author =

    Keras2c:. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104182 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104182 2021

  62. [62]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , author =

    Parallelized real-time physics codes for plasma control on. Fusion Engineering and Design , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2026.115699 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2026.115699 2026

  63. [63]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Quantifying electron cyclotron power deposition broadening in DIII-D and the potential consequences for the ITER EC system , volume =. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/acaedc , language =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/acaedc 2023

  64. [64]

    Enabling

    Rothstein, Andrew and Farre-Kaga, Hiro Joseph and Butt, Jalal and Shousha, Ricardo and Erickson, Keith and Wakatsuki, Takuma and Jalalvand, Azarakhsh and Steiner, Peter and Kim, Sangkyeun and Kolemen, Egemen , month = nov, year =. Enabling. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.08818 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.08818

  65. [65]

    Physics of Plasmas , author =

    Interpreting. Physics of Plasmas , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0311201 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0311201 2026

  66. [66]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    Application of very high harmonic fast waves for off-axis current drive in the. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/8/083024 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/8/083024 2014

  67. [67]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    First high-power helicon results from. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad78e8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad78e8 2024

  68. [68]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    The effects of electron cyclotron heating and current drive on toroidal. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aa90ee , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aa90ee 2018

  69. [69]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Reversed shear. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/50/3/035009 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/50/3/035009 2008

  70. [70]

    APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts , year = 2019, series =

    Absorption and Current Drive With Top Launch ECH on DIII-D. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts , year = 2019, series =

    2019

  71. [71]

    Citrin, Jonathan and Goodfellow, Ian and Raju, Akhil and Chen, Jeremy and Degrave, Jonas and Donner, Craig and Felici, Federico and Hamel, Philippe and Huber, Andrea and Nikulin, Dmitry and Pfau, David and Tracey, Brendan and Riedmiller, Martin and Kohli, Pushmeet , month = jun, year =

  72. [72]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =

    Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control , volume =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/54/2/025002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/54/2/025002 2012

  73. [73]

    Meneghini, O and Slendebroek, T and Lyons, B C and McLaughlin, K and McClenaghan, J and Stagner, L and Harvey, J and Neiser, T F and Ghiozzi, A and Dose, G and Guterl, J and Zalzali, A and Cote, T and Shi, N and Weisberg, D and Smith, S P and Grierson, B A and Candy, J , year =