pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17673 · v1 · pith:W273WVK3new · submitted 2026-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mes-hall

Graphene Josephson diodes from inherent asymmetric disorder

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 22:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords grapheneJosephson junctionsupercurrent rectificationJosephson diodeasymmetric disorderFraunhofer patternsymmetry breakingsuperconducting electronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Graphene Josephson junctions rectify supercurrent above 20 percent efficiency due to inherent long-range disorder under small magnetic fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that graphene Josephson junctions can act as diodes for supercurrent, achieving rectification efficiency over 20 percent when a millitesla out-of-plane magnetic field is applied. This non-reciprocal behavior emerges in highly transparent junctions because long-range scattering potentials from unavoidable asymmetric residual disorder break inversion symmetry. The rectification strengthens near the nodes of the Fraunhofer interference pattern. A reader would care because the result indicates that clean two-dimensional systems already contain enough disorder to enable such devices without additional engineering, with potential uses in superconducting electronics and as probes of symmetry breaking.

Core claim

Graphene Josephson junctions exhibit supercurrent rectification with efficiency exceeding 20 percent when a millitesla-scale out-of-plane magnetic field is applied, and the effect is enhanced near the nodes of the Fraunhofer interference pattern. The model identifies long-range scattering potentials in the junction as the mechanism that breaks inversion symmetry and produces rectification even in highly transparent junctions. Residual disorder inherent to an otherwise clean two-dimensional system is shown to be sufficient for the diode effect, and external gates can be used to tailor the symmetry breaking.

What carries the argument

Long-range scattering potentials from inherent asymmetric disorder, which break inversion symmetry to produce non-reciprocal supercurrent in highly transparent junctions.

If this is right

  • Rectification efficiency exceeds 20 percent and increases near Fraunhofer pattern nodes under millitesla magnetic fields.
  • Unavoidable residual disorder in clean two-dimensional systems suffices to generate the diode effect.
  • External gate design can tailor the inversion symmetry breaking to control the rectification.
  • The mechanism operates without requiring low transparency or deliberate interface modifications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar rectification may appear in other clean two-dimensional materials that host long-range scattering.
  • Controlled asymmetric gating could convert the effect into a tunable parameter for device design.
  • The result implies that symmetry-breaking probes in mesoscopic superconductivity can rely on native disorder rather than added complexity.

Load-bearing premise

The observed rectification arises specifically from long-range scattering potentials due to inherent asymmetric disorder rather than from interface effects, fabrication artifacts, or other sources, and the junctions remain highly transparent.

What would settle it

Measuring zero or symmetric rectification in a graphene junction where long-range potentials have been engineered to be symmetric while keeping transparency high.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17673 by Alessandro Crippa, Camilla Coletti, Elia Strambini, Fabio Beltram, Francesco Giazotto, Ivan Villani, Kenji Watanabe, Luca Chirolli, Matteo Carrega, Sergio Pezzini, Stefan Heun, Takashi Taniguchi, Vaidotas Miseikis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Top view schematics of device layout. Graphene is encapsulated in hBN and edge-contacted by Nb leads. The heterostructure is placed on top of a Si/SiO2 substrate, which acts as a backgate via the application of a backgate voltage VBG. A current I is applied and flows through the junction, and the voltage drop is measured. Currents flowing in either positive (I +) or negative (I −) directions are indica… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Backgate sweep: sample resistance R as a function of backgate voltage VBG, measured by applying a large DC current bias. The acquisition position of the Fraunhofer patterns in b,d,f is indicated. T = 4.2 K, B = 0 T. (b-g) Upper row: Fraunhofer patterns (voltage drop |V | as function of out-of-plane magnetic field B and DC bias current Ibias). Lower row: corresponding rectification parameter η at differ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Onsite potential V1(r) = V f1(r) for V = Vmax = 0.01 t. The spatial coordinates are in units of the lattice constant. (b) Calculated Fraunhofer patterns (I + c and |I − c |) for V = Vmax and chemical potential µ = 0.3t. (c) Color-coded evolution of the rectification coefficient η for varying V in the range −Vmax < V < Vmax, as a function of applied magnetic flux 2eΦ/h. (d) Onsite potential V2(r) = V f2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Onsite potential V1 for V = Vmax = 0.01 t. (b) Calculated Fraunhofer patterns (I + c and |I − c |) for the case of armchair edges for µ = 0.3t. (c) Color-coded evolution of the rectification coefficient η with chemical potential µ, crossing the Dirac point. (d) Graphene strip with armachair edges. (e-f) Same as b-c, but for a graphene strip with zigzag as shown in g. The rectification coefficient in Fi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Josephson diodes are non-reciprocal superconducting devices characterized by different switching currents depending on the current flow direction. They recently attracted considerable theoretical and experimental attention, in view of their possible application as rectifying elements in the field of superconducting electronics, and as probes to investigate symmetry breaking mechanisms in mesoscopic systems. In this work, we show that graphene Josephson junctions provide rectification of supercurrent with an efficiency exceeding 20%. The effect appears applying a mT out-of-plane magnetic field and is enhanced close to the nodes of the Fraunhofer interference pattern. Our theoretical model identifies long-range scattering potentials in the junction as the symmetry-breaking mechanism, which yields supercurrent rectification in highly transparent junctions. While graphene stands as an ultra-clean transmission medium, our work shows that unavoidable residual disorder in a clean two-dimensional system is sufficient to promote this effect. Tailoring of the inversion (mirror) symmetry breaking could be obtained via proper design of external gates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental observation of supercurrent rectification in graphene Josephson junctions, achieving efficiencies exceeding 20% under small (mT) out-of-plane magnetic fields, with the effect enhanced near nodes of the Fraunhofer interference pattern. A theoretical model identifies long-range scattering potentials from inherent asymmetric disorder as the inversion-symmetry-breaking mechanism that produces the diode effect even in highly transparent junctions, demonstrating that residual disorder in an ultra-clean 2D system suffices for the phenomenon.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work establishes a disorder-based route to Josephson diodes in graphene without requiring engineered interfaces or external gates for symmetry breaking, with direct relevance to superconducting electronics and symmetry-probing experiments. The linkage between long-range potentials, Fraunhofer-node enhancement, and high transparency, backed by simulations matching the data, provides a concrete, testable mechanism that distinguishes this from interface or fabrication artifacts.

minor comments (2)
  1. The definition of rectification efficiency (e.g., whether it is |I_c^+ - I_c^-| / (I_c^+ + I_c^-)) and the precise criteria for 'highly transparent' junctions should be stated explicitly in the main text, with reference to the measured normal-state resistance or I_c R_N product.
  2. Figure captions and the methods section would benefit from tabulated device parameters (junction length, width, mobility, and carrier density at the operating point) to allow direct comparison with the model's assumptions on disorder range and transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of our central claims, and the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that our work demonstrates a disorder-based mechanism for the Josephson diode effect in graphene without engineered interfaces.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical model that attributes supercurrent rectification to long-range scattering potentials arising from inherent asymmetric disorder in graphene Josephson junctions, with the effect enhanced near Fraunhofer nodes under mT fields. This identification is supported by simulations and experimental traces that align with the high-transparency assumption, without any quoted equation or step reducing a claimed prediction to a parameter fitted from the same dataset or to a self-citation chain. The central mechanism is derived from the disorder properties rather than defined circularly from the observed rectification efficiency, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior self-work in a way that collapses the result to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard Josephson junction theory (Fraunhofer pattern) and the identification of long-range disorder as the symmetry breaker; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard Fraunhofer interference pattern governs the magnetic-field dependence of the critical current
    The enhancement near nodes is described using the conventional Fraunhofer form without derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5739 in / 1188 out tokens · 41541 ms · 2026-06-26T22:29:34.633370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pierret.Advanced Semiconductor Fundamentals

    R.F. Pierret.Advanced Semiconductor Fundamentals. Modular series on solid state devices. Prentice Hall, 2003

  2. [2]

    Superconducting Diode Effects: Mechanisms, Materials and Applications.Advanced Physics Research, 4(6):2400180, 2025

    Jiajun Ma, Ruiya Zhan, and Xiao Lin. Superconducting Diode Effects: Mechanisms, Materials and Applications.Advanced Physics Research, 4(6):2400180, 2025

  3. [3]

    Universal Josephson diode effect

    Margarita Davydova, Saranesh Prembabu, and Liang Fu. Universal Josephson diode effect. Science Advances, 8(23):eabo0309, 2022

  4. [4]

    Theories of super- conducting diode effects,

    Daniel Shaffer and Alex Levchenko. Theories of Superconducting Diode Effects, 2025. arXiv:2510.25864. (accessed June 15, 2026)

  5. [5]

    Observation of superconducting diode effect.Nature, 584(7821):373–376, Aug 2020

    Fuyuki Ando, Yuta Miyasaka, Tian Li, Jun Ishizuka, Tomonori Arakawa, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Youichi Yanase, and Teruo Ono. Observation of superconducting diode effect.Nature, 584(7821):373–376, Aug 2020

  6. [6]

    Tokatly, Alessandro Braggio, Nadia Rocci, Mirkoand Ligato, Valentina Zannier, Lucia Sorba, F

    Elia Strambini, Andrea Iorio, Ofelia Durante, Roberta Citro, Cristina Sanz-Fern´ andez, Claudio Guarcello, Ilya V. Tokatly, Alessandro Braggio, Nadia Rocci, Mirkoand Ligato, Valentina Zannier, Lucia Sorba, F. Sebasti´ an Bergeret, and Francesco Giazotto. A Josephson phase battery.Nature Nanotechnology, 15(8):656–660, Aug 2020

  7. [7]

    General Theory of Josephson Diodes.Phys

    Yi Zhang, Yuhao Gu, Pengfei Li, Jiangping Hu, and Kun Jiang. General Theory of Josephson Diodes.Phys. Rev. X, 12:041013, Nov 2022

  8. [8]

    Noah F. Q. Yuan and Liang Fu. Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum super- conductors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(15):e2119548119, 2022

  9. [9]

    Josephson Diode Effect in Supercurrent Interferometers.Phys

    Rub´ en Seoane Souto, Martin Leijnse, and Constantin Schrade. Josephson Diode Effect in Supercurrent Interferometers.Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:267702, Dec 2022

  10. [10]

    A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes.New Journal of Physics, 24(5):053014, may 2022

    James Jun He, Yukio Tanaka, and Naoto Nagaosa. A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes.New Journal of Physics, 24(5):053014, may 2022

  11. [11]

    Supercurrent diode with high winding vortex.Communications Physics, 8(1):518, Nov 2025

    Yuri Fukaya, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Daniel Margineda, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Stram- bini, Francesco Giazotto, Carmine Ortix, and Mario Cuoco. Supercurrent diode with high winding vortex.Communications Physics, 8(1):518, Nov 2025

  12. [12]

    Nonreciprocal Transport and Optical Phenomena in Quantum Materials.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 15(Volume 15, 2024):63–83, 2024

    Naoto Nagaosa and Youichi Yanase. Nonreciprocal Transport and Optical Phenomena in Quantum Materials.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 15(Volume 15, 2024):63–83, 2024

  13. [13]

    Theory of the nonreciprocal josephson effect.Phys

    Kou Misaki and Naoto Nagaosa. Theory of the nonreciprocal josephson effect.Phys. Rev. B, 103:245302, Jun 2021

  14. [14]

    Anomalous supercurrent and diode effect in locally perturbed topological Josephson junctions.Applied Physics Letters, 124(24):242601, 06 2024

    Samuele Fracassi, Simone Traverso, Niccolo Traverso Ziani, Matteo Carrega, Stefan Heun, and Maura Sassetti. Anomalous supercurrent and diode effect in locally perturbed topological Josephson junctions.Applied Physics Letters, 124(24):242601, 06 2024

  15. [15]

    Intrinsic and tunable superconducting diode effect in quantum spin hall systems, 2025

    Samuele Fracassi, Simone Traverso, Stefan Heun, Maura Sassetti, Matteo Carrega, and Niccolo Traverso Ziani. Intrinsic and tunable superconducting diode effect in quantum spin hall systems, 2025. arXiv:2512.02575. (accessed May 07, 2026). 19

  16. [16]

    Gardner, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J

    Christian Baumgartner, Lorenz Fuchs, Andreas Costa, Simon Reinhardt, Sergei Gronin, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J. Manfra, Paulo E. Faria Junior, Denis Kochan, Jaroslav Fabian, Nicola Paradiso, and Christoph Strunk. Supercurrent rectifica- tion and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions.Nature Nanotechnology, 17(1):39–44,...

  17. [17]

    V¨ ayrynen, Yuli Lyanda-Geller, and Leonid P

    Ananthesh Sundaresh, Jukka I. V¨ ayrynen, Yuli Lyanda-Geller, and Leonid P. Rokhinson. Diamagnetic mechanism of critical current non-reciprocity in multilayered superconduc- tors.Nature Communications, 14(1):1628, Mar 2023

  18. [18]

    Bauer, Kai-Qiang Lin, John M

    Lorenz Bauriedl, Christian B¨ auml, Lorenz Fuchs, Christian Baumgartner, Nicolas Paulik, Jonas M. Bauer, Kai-Qiang Lin, John M. Lupton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Christoph Strunk, and Nicola Paradiso. Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2.Nature Communications, 13(1):4266, Jul 2022

  19. [19]

    Josephson Diode Effect in High-Mobility InSb Nanoflags.Nano Letters, 22(21):8502–8508, Nov 2022

    Bianca Turini, Sedighe Salimian, Matteo Carrega, Andrea Iorio, Elia Strambini, Francesco Giazotto, Valentina Zannier, Lucia Sorba, and Stefan Heun. Josephson Diode Effect in High-Mobility InSb Nanoflags.Nano Letters, 22(21):8502–8508, Nov 2022

  20. [20]

    Sivakumar, Margarita Davydova, Ajesh K

    Banabir Pal, Anirban Chakraborty, Pranava K. Sivakumar, Margarita Davydova, Ajesh K. Gopi, Avanindra K. Pandeya, Jonas A. Krieger, Yang Zhang, Mihir Date, Sailong Ju, Noah Yuan, Niels B. M. Schr¨ oter, Liang Fu, and Stuart S. P. Parkin. Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal.Nature Physics, 18(10):1228–1233, Oct 2022

  21. [21]

    Schiela, Barı¸ s Pekerten, Peng Yu, Bassel Heiba Elfeky, William M

    Neda Lotfizadeh, William F. Schiela, Barı¸ s Pekerten, Peng Yu, Bassel Heiba Elfeky, William M. Strickland, Alex Matos-Abiague, and Javad Shabani. Superconducting diode effect sign change in epitaxial Al-InAs Josephson junctions.Communications Physics, 7(1):120, Apr 2024

  22. [22]

    Costa, C

    A. Costa, C. Baumgartner, S. Reinhardt, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lin- demann, M. J. Manfra, D. Fabian, J.and Kochan, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk. Sign reversal of the Josephson inductance magnetochiral anisotropy and 0–π-like transitions in supercurrent diodes.Nature Nanotechnology, 18(11):1266–1272, Nov 2023

  23. [23]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, Jordi Pic´ o-Cort´ es, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk. Effect of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin–orbit coupling on supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral anisotropy of ballistic Josephson junctions. Journal of Phy...

  24. [24]

    Dhavala Suri, Akashdeep Kamra, Thomas N. G. Meier, Matthias Kronseder, Wolfgang Belzig, Christian H. Back, and Christoph Strunk. Non-reciprocity of vortex-limited critical current in conventional superconducting micro-bridges.Applied Physics Letters, 121(10):102601, 09 2022

  25. [25]

    Ritter, Daniel Z

    Yasen Hou, Fabrizio Nichele, Hang Chi, Alessandro Lodesani, Yingying Wu, Markus F. Ritter, Daniel Z. Haxell, Margarita Davydova, Stefan Ili´ c, Ourania Glezakou-Elbert, Amith Varambally, F. Sebastian Bergeret, Akashdeep Kamra, Liang Fu, Patrick A. Lee, and Jagadeesh S. Moodera. Ubiquitous Superconducting Diode Effect in Superconductor Thin Films.Phys. Rev...

  26. [26]

    Greco, Q

    A. Greco, Q. Pichard, and F. Giazotto. Josephson diode effect in monolithic dc-SQUIDs based on 3D Dayem nanobridges.Applied Physics Letters, 123(9):092601, 08 2023. 20

  27. [27]

    D´ ıez-M´ erida, A

    J. D´ ıez-M´ erida, A. D´ ıez-Carl´ on, S. Y. Yang, Y.-M. Xie, X.-J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Higginbotham, K. T. Law, and Dmitri K. Efetov. Symmetry- broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene.Nature Communications, 14(1):2396, Apr 2023

  28. [28]

    Sign reversal diode effect in superconducting Dayem nanobridges.Communications Physics, 6(1):343, Nov 2023

    Daniel Margineda, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Strambini, Yuri Fukaya, Maria Teresa Mer- caldo, Mario Cuoco, and Francesco Giazotto. Sign reversal diode effect in superconducting Dayem nanobridges.Communications Physics, 6(1):343, Nov 2023

  29. [29]

    Interfering Josephson diode effect in Ta 2Pd3Te5 asymmetric edge interferometer.Nature Communications, 15(1):9031, Oct 2024

    Yupeng Li, Dayu Yan, Yu Hong, Haohao Sheng, Anqi Wang, Ziwei Dou, Xingchen Guo, Xiaofan Shi, Zikang Su, Zhaozheng Lyu, Tian Qian, Guangtong Liu, Fanming Qu, Kun Jiang, Zhijun Wang, Youguo Shi, Zhu-An Xu, Jiangping Hu, Li Lu, and Jie Shen. Interfering Josephson diode effect in Ta 2Pd3Te5 asymmetric edge interferometer.Nature Communications, 15(1):9031, Oct 2024

  30. [30]

    Broadway, Mykhailo Flaks, Tony X

    Shaowen Chen, Seunghyun Park, Uri Vool, Nikola Maksimovic, David A. Broadway, Mykhailo Flaks, Tony X. Zhou, Patrick Maletinsky, Ady Stern, Bertrand I. Halperin, and Amir Yacoby. Current induced hidden states in Josephson junctions.Nature Communications, 15(1):8059, Sep 2024

  31. [31]

    Edelstein Effect Induced Superconducting Diode Effect in Inversion Symmetry Breaking MoTe2 Josephson Junctions.Advanced Functional Materials, 34(10):2311229, 2024

    Pingbo Chen, Gongqi Wang, Bicong Ye, Jinhua Wang, Liang Zhou, Zhenzhong Tang, Le Wang, Jiannong Wang, Wenqing Zhang, Jiawei Mei, Weiqiang Chen, and Hongtao He. Edelstein Effect Induced Superconducting Diode Effect in Inversion Symmetry Breaking MoTe2 Josephson Junctions.Advanced Functional Materials, 34(10):2311229, 2024

  32. [32]

    Self-Field-Induced Josephson Diode Effect.Nano Letters, 25(26):10544–10548, Jul 2025

    Arman Rashidi, Sina Ahadi, and Susanne Stemmer. Self-Field-Induced Josephson Diode Effect.Nano Letters, 25(26):10544–10548, Jul 2025

  33. [33]

    Sivakumar, Chris Pasco, Ulderico Filippozzi, Stuart S

    Heng Wu, Yaojia Wang, Yuanfeng Xu, Pranava K. Sivakumar, Chris Pasco, Ulderico Filippozzi, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Yu-Jia Zeng, Tyrel McQueen, and Mazhar N. Ali. The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure.Nature, 604(7907):653–656, Apr 2022

  34. [34]

    Ognev, Alexander S

    Hideki Narita, Jun Ishizuka, Ryo Kawarazaki, Daisuke Kan, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Yuichi Shimakawa, Alexey V. Ognev, Alexander S. Samardak, Youichi Yanase, and Teruo Ono. Field-free superconducting diode effect in noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductor/ferromagnet multilayers.Nature Nanotechnology, 17(8):823–828, Aug 2022

  35. [35]

    Kun-Rok Jeon, Jae-Keun Kim, Jiho Yoon, Jae-Chun Jeon, Hyeon Han, Audrey Cottet, Takis Kontos, and Stuart S. P. Parkin. Zero-field polarity-reversible Josephson supercur- rent diodes enabled by a proximity-magnetized Pt barrier.Nature Materials, 21(9):1008– 1013, Sep 2022

  36. [36]

    Strambini, M

    E. Strambini, M. Spies, N. Ligato, S. Ili´ c, M. Rouco, Carmen Gonz´ alez-Orellana, Maxim Ilyn, Celia Rogero, F. S. Bergeret, J. S. Moodera, P. Virtanen, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and F. Gi- azotto. Superconducting spintronic tunnel diode.Nature Communications, 13(1):2431, May 2022

  37. [37]

    Scammell, Song Liu, Daniel Rhodes, K

    Jiang-Xiazi Lin, Phum Siriviboon, Harley D. Scammell, Song Liu, Daniel Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, James Hone, Mathias S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li. Zero- field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene.Nature Physics, 18(10):1221–1227, Oct 2022. 21

  38. [38]

    Arnault, Chun-Chia Chen, Trevyn F

    John Chiles, Ethan G. Arnault, Chun-Chia Chen, Trevyn F. Q. Larson, Lingfei Zhao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Fran¸ cois Amet, and Gleb Finkelstein. Nonreciprocal Supercurrents in a Field-Free Graphene Josephson Triode.Nano Letters, 23(11):5257–5263, Jun 2023

  39. [39]

    High-temperature field-free superconducting diode effect in high-T c cuprates.Nature Communications, 16(1):531, Jan 2025

    Shichao Qi, Jun Ge, Chengcheng Ji, Yiwen Ai, Gaoxing Ma, Ziqiao Wang, Zihan Cui, Yi Liu, Ziqiang Wang, and Jian Wang. High-temperature field-free superconducting diode effect in high-T c cuprates.Nature Communications, 16(1):531, Jan 2025

  40. [40]

    Back-action supercurrent rectifiers.Com- munications Physics, 8(1):16, Jan 2025

    Daniel Margineda, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Strambini, Laura Borgongino, Alessandro Paghi, Giorgio de Simoni, Lucia Sorba, Yuri Fukaya, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Carmine Ortix, Mario Cuoco, and Francesco Giazotto. Back-action supercurrent rectifiers.Com- munications Physics, 8(1):16, Jan 2025

  41. [41]

    Biharmonic- Drive Tunable Josephson Diode.Nano Letters, 25(39):14451–14458, Oct 2025

    Laura Borgongino, Rub´ en Seoane Souto, Alessandro Paghi, Giulio Senesi, Katarzyna Skib- inska, Lucia Sorba, Elisa Riccardi, Francesco Giazotto, and Elia Strambini. Biharmonic- Drive Tunable Josephson Diode.Nano Letters, 25(39):14451–14458, Oct 2025

  42. [42]

    Superconducting Diode Effect in a Constricted Nanowire.Advanced Quantum Technologies, 7(9):2300378, 2024

    Xiaofu Zhang, Qingchang Huan, Ruoyan Ma, Xingyu Zhang, Jia Huang, Xiaoyu Liu, Wei Peng, Hao Li, Zhen Wang, Xiaoming Xie, and Lixing You. Superconducting Diode Effect in a Constricted Nanowire.Advanced Quantum Technologies, 7(9):2300378, 2024

  43. [43]

    Jangade, Ruta Kulkarni, A

    Sanat Ghosh, Vilas Patil, Amit Basu, Kuldeep, Achintya Dutta, Digambar A. Jangade, Ruta Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, Jacob F. Steiner, Felix von Oppen, and Mandar M. Deshmukh. High-temperature Josephson diode.Nature Materials, 23(5):612–618, May 2024

  44. [44]

    Supercurrent diode effect in thin film Nb tracks.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(20):203901, 05 2023

    N Satchell, PM Shepley, MC Rosamond, and G Burnell. Supercurrent diode effect in thin film Nb tracks.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(20):203901, 05 2023

  45. [45]

    Svetogorov, Daniel Z

    Marco Coraiola, Aleksandr E. Svetogorov, Daniel Z. Haxell, Deividas Sabonis, Manuel Hinderling, Sofieke C. ten Kate, Erik Cheah, Filip Krizek, R¨ udiger Schott, Werner Wegscheider, Juan Carlos Cuevas, Wolfgang Belzig, and Fabrizio Nichele. Flux-Tunable Josephson Diode Effect in a Hybrid Four-Terminal Josephson Junction.ACS Nano, 18(12):9221–9231, Mar 2024

  46. [46]

    Graziano, Mihir Pendharkar, Jason T

    Mohit Gupta, Gino V. Graziano, Mihir Pendharkar, Jason T. Dong, Connor P. Dempsey, Chris Palmstrøm, and Vlad S. Pribiag. Gate-tunable superconducting diode effect in a three-terminal Josephson device.Nature Communications, 14(1):3078, May 2023

  47. [47]

    Gardner, Michael J

    Sadashige Matsuo, Takaya Imoto, Tomohiro Yokoyama, Yosuke Sato, Tyler Lindemann, Sergei Gronin, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Michael J. Manfra, and Seigo Tarucha. Josephson diode effect derived from short-range coherent coupling.Nature Physics, 19(11):1636–1641, Nov 2023

  48. [48]

    Parity- conserving Cooper-pair transport and ideal superconducting diode in planar germanium

    Marco Valentini, Oliver Sagi, Levon Baghumyan, Thijs de Gijsel, Jason Jung, Stefano Calcaterra, Andrea Ballabio, Juan Aguilera Servin, Kushagra Aggarwal, Marian Janik, Thomas Adletzberger, Rub´ en Seoane Souto, Martin Leijnse, Jeroen Danon, Constantin Schrade, Erik Bakkers, Daniel Chrastina, Giovanni Isella, and Georgios Katsaros. Parity- conserving Coope...

  49. [49]

    Carlo Ciaccia, Roy Haller, Asbjørn C. C. Drachmann, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J. Manfra, Constantin Schrade, and Christian Sch¨ onenberger. Gate-tunable josephson diode in proximitized inas supercurrent interferometers.Phys. Rev. Res., 5:033131, Aug 2023. 22

  50. [50]

    Gate-Tunable Josephson Diodes in Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Nano Letters, 26(6):2119–2128, Feb 2026

    Alexander Rothstein, Robin Joey Dolleman, Lennart Klebl, Anthony Achtermann, Frank Volmer, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Fabian Hassler, Luca Banszerus, Bernd Beschoten, and Christoph Stampfer. Gate-Tunable Josephson Diodes in Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Nano Letters, 26(6):2119–2128, Feb 2026

  51. [51]

    Unveiling the Current-Phase Relationship of InSb Nanoflag Josephson Junctions Using a NanoSQUID Magnetometer

    Andrea Chieppa, Gaurav Shukla, Simone Traverso, Giada Bucci, Valentina Zannier, Samuele Fracassi, Niccolo Traverso Ziani, Maura Sassetti, Matteo Carrega, Fabio Bel- tram, Francesco Giazotto, Lucia Sorba, and Stefan Heun. Unveiling the Current-Phase Relationship of InSb Nanoflag Josephson Junctions Using a NanoSQUID Magnetometer. Nano Letters, 25(39):14412...

  52. [52]

    Heikkil¨ a, and F

    Stefan Ili´ c, Pauli Virtanen, Daniel Crawford, Tero T. Heikkil¨ a, and F. Sebasti´ an Bergeret. Superconducting diode effect in diffusive superconductors and Josephson junctions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling.Phys. Rev. B, 110:L140501, Oct 2024

  53. [53]

    Gate-Tunable Orbital Magnetism and Competing Superconductivity in Twisted Trilayer Graphene Josephson Junctions.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 17(51):69784–69794, Dec 2025

    Vishal Bhardwaj, Lekshmi Rajagopal, Lorenzo Arici, Matan Bocarsly, Alexey Ilin, Gal Shavit, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Yuval Oreg, Tobias Holder, and Yuval Ronen. Gate-Tunable Orbital Magnetism and Competing Superconductivity in Twisted Trilayer Graphene Josephson Junctions.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 17(51):69784–69794, Dec 2025

  54. [54]

    Jin-Xin Hu, Zi-Ting Sun, Ying-Ming Xie, and K. T. Law. Josephson Diode Effect Induced by Valley Polarization in Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:266003, Jun 2023

  55. [55]

    Bockrath, Kin Fai Mak, and Fan Zhang

    Chun Ning Lau, Marc W. Bockrath, Kin Fai Mak, and Fan Zhang. Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moir´ e materials.Nature, 602(7895):41–50, Feb 2022

  56. [56]

    V. E. Calado, S. Goswami, G. Nanda, M. Diez, A. R. Akhmerov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. M. Klapwijk, and L. M. K. Vandersypen. Ballistic Josephson junctions in edge-contacted graphene.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(9):761–764, July 2015

  57. [57]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim. The electronic properties of graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys., 81:109–162, Jan 2009

  58. [58]

    Disorder in van der Waals heterostructures of 2D materials.Nature Materials, 18(6):541–549, Jun 2019

    Daniel Rhodes, Sang Hoon Chae, Rebeca Ribeiro-Palau, and James Hone. Disorder in van der Waals heterostructures of 2D materials.Nature Materials, 18(6):541–549, Jun 2019

  59. [59]

    Brar, William Regan, Hsin-Zon Tsai, Qiong Wu, William Gannett, Alex Zettl, and Michael F

    R´ egis Decker, Yang Wang, Victor W. Brar, William Regan, Hsin-Zon Tsai, Qiong Wu, William Gannett, Alex Zettl, and Michael F. Crommie. Local Electronic Properties of Graphene on a BN Substrate via Scanning Tunneling Microscopy.Nano Letters, 11(6):2291–2295, Jun 2011

  60. [60]

    Diode effect in the Fraunhofer pattern of disordered planar Josephson junctions.Communications Physics, 8(1):483, Nov 2025

    Luca Chirolli, Angelo Greco, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Strambini, Mario Cuoco, Luigi Amico, and Francesco Giazotto. Diode effect in the Fraunhofer pattern of disordered planar Josephson junctions.Communications Physics, 8(1):483, Nov 2025

  61. [61]

    Quasi-Φ 0-Periodic Supercurrent at Quantum Hall Transitions.ACS Nano, 19(30):27370–27378, Aug 2025

    Ivan Villani, Matteo Carrega, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Strambini, Francesco Giazotto, Vaidotas Miˇ seikis, Camilla Coletti, Fabio Beltram, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Stefan Heun, and Sergio Pezzini. Quasi-Φ 0-Periodic Supercurrent at Quantum Hall Transitions.ACS Nano, 19(30):27370–27378, Aug 2025

  62. [62]

    Miseikis, D

    V. Miseikis, D. Convertino, N. Mishra, M. Gemmi, T. Mashoff, S. Heun, N. Haghighian, F. Bisio, M. Canepa, V. Piazza, and C. Coletti. Rapid CVD growth of millimetre-sized single crystal graphene using a cold-wall reactor.2D Materials, 2(1):014006, jan 2015. 23

  63. [63]

    Deterministic patterned growth of high-mobility large-crystal graphene: a path towards wafer scale integration.2D Materials, 4(2):021004, 2017

    Vaidotas Miseikis, Federica Bianco, J´ er´ emy David, Mauro Gemmi, Vittorio Pellegrini, Marco Romagnoli, and Camilla Coletti. Deterministic patterned growth of high-mobility large-crystal graphene: a path towards wafer scale integration.2D Materials, 4(2):021004, 2017

  64. [64]

    High-quality electrical transport using scalable CVD graphene.2D Materials, 7(4):041003, 2020

    Sergio Pezzini, Vaidotas Miˇ seikis, Simona Pace, Francesco Rossella, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Camilla Coletti. High-quality electrical transport using scalable CVD graphene.2D Materials, 7(4):041003, 2020

  65. [65]

    Ben Shalom, M

    M. Ben Shalom, M. J. Zhu, V. I. Fal’ko, A. Mishchenko, A. V. Kretinin, K. S. Novoselov, C. R. Woods, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. K. Geim, and J. R. Prance. Quantum oscillations of the critical current and high-field superconducting proximity in ballistic graphene.Nature Physics, 12(4):318–322, Apr 2016

  66. [66]

    I. V. Borzenets, F. Amet, C. T. Ke, A. W. Draelos, M. T. Wei, A. Seredinski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y. Bomze, M. Yamamoto, S. Tarucha, and G. Finkelstein. Ballistic Graphene Josephson Junctions from the Short to the Long Junction Regimes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:237002, 2016

  67. [67]

    Samaddar, I

    S. Samaddar, I. Yudhistira, S. Adam, H. Courtois, and C. B. Winkelmann. Charge Puddles in Graphene near the Dirac Point.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:126804, Mar 2016

  68. [68]

    Das Sarma, Shaffique Adam, E

    S. Das Sarma, Shaffique Adam, E. H. Hwang, and Enrico Rossi. Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:407–470, May 2011

  69. [69]

    Full electrostatic control of quantum interference in an extended trenched Josephson junction.Phys

    Stefano Guiducci, Matteo Carrega, Fabio Taddei, Giorgio Biasiol, Herv´ e Courtois, Fabio Beltram, and Stefan Heun. Full electrostatic control of quantum interference in an extended trenched Josephson junction.Phys. Rev. B, 99:235419, Jun 2019

  70. [70]

    Side-gate modulation of supercurrent in insb nanoflag-based josephson junctions.physica status solidi (b), 262(7):2400534, 2025

    Bianca Turini, Sedighe Salimian, Matteo Carrega, Federico Paolucci, Valentina Zannier, Lucia Sorba, and Stefan Heun. Side-gate modulation of supercurrent in insb nanoflag-based josephson junctions.physica status solidi (b), 262(7):2400534, 2025

  71. [71]

    Draelos, Ethan G

    Andrew Seredinski, Anne W. Draelos, Ethan G. Arnault, Ming-Tso Wei, Hengming Li, Tate Fleming, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Fran¸ cois Amet, and Gleb Finkel- stein. Quantum Hall-based superconducting interference device.Science Advances, 5(9):eaaw8693, 2019

  72. [72]

    L. Wang, I. Meric, P. Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. M. Campos, D. A. Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K. L. Shepard, and C. R. Dean. One- Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material.Science, 342(6158):614– 617, 2013

  73. [73]

    D. G. Purdie, N. M. Pugno, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. C. Ferrari, and A. Lom- bardo. Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures.Nature Communications, 9(1):5387, Dec 2018

  74. [74]

    Nuno J. G. Couto, Davide Costanzo, Stephan Engels, Dong-Keun Ki, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Christoph Stampfer, Francisco Guinea, and Alberto F. Morpurgo. Random Strain Fluctuations as Dominant Disorder Source for High-Quality On-Substrate Graphene Devices.Phys. Rev. X, 4:041019, Oct 2014. 24

  75. [75]

    Neumann, S

    C. Neumann, S. Reichardt, P. Venezuela, M. Dr¨ ogeler, L. Banszerus, M. Schmitz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Mauri, B. Beschoten, S. V. Rotkin, and C. Stampfer. Raman spectroscopy as probe of nanometre-scale strain variations in graphene.Nature Communications, 6(1):8429, Sep 2015

  76. [76]

    K¨ ummel, A

    John Bardeen, R. K¨ ummel, A. E. Jacobs, and L. Tewordt. Structure of vortex lines in pure superconductors.Phys. Rev., 187:556–569, Nov 1969

  77. [77]

    C. W. J. Beenakker. Universal limit of critical-current fluctuations in mesoscopic josephson junctions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:3836–3839, Dec 1991

  78. [78]

    C. W. J. Beenakker. Random-matrix theory of quantum transport.Rev. Mod. Phys., 69:731–808, Jul 1997

  79. [79]

    universal

    C. W. J. Beenakker. Three “universal” mesoscopic josephson effects. In Hidetoshi Fukuyama and Tsuneya Ando, editors,Transport Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems, pages 235–253, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

  80. [80]

    van Heck, S

    B. van Heck, S. Mi, and A. R. Akhmerov. Single fermion manipulation via superconducting phase differences in multiterminal josephson junctions.Phys. Rev. B, 90:155450, Oct 2014. 25