pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17870 · v1 · pith:7PD76VTDnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Robust Signatures of Fragile Topology

Viktor K\"onye , Ihor Nimyi , Oleg Janson , Jeroen van den Brink , Jasper van Wezel , Cosma Fulga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 22:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords fragile topologyDirac conestime-reversal symmetrytwofold rotation symmetrytwo-dimensional materialstopological indexbulk band structurefirst-principles calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fragile topology forces bulk Dirac cones in 2D materials with time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a fragile topological index, defined for two-dimensional systems respecting time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry, guarantees the appearance of gap-closing points in the bulk band structure no matter how many valence bands are present. This index provides a concrete, observable signature because the guaranteed gap closings manifest as Dirac cones that can be detected by spectroscopy or first-principles calculations. A reader would care because fragile phases were previously viewed as hard to detect experimentally due to the absence of protected boundary states and their sensitivity to band addition; the new index turns them into systems with robust bulk features instead.

Core claim

In systems with time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry, fragile topology is captured by an index that forces gap-closing points to exist in the band structure of two-dimensional materials with arbitrarily many bands; first-principles calculations confirm such Dirac points appear in all five tested materials.

What carries the argument

The fragile topological index defined under time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry, which counts obstructions that force gap closings.

If this is right

  • Fragile topology produces directly measurable bulk Dirac cones rather than only fragile boundary features.
  • The index works for materials containing any number of bands.
  • First-principles band-structure calculations can locate the guaranteed Dirac points in candidate materials.
  • The same index supplies an alternate route to discovering Dirac cones without exhaustive band searches.
  • Materials identified this way may exhibit nonlinear transport tied to the Dirac points.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The guaranteed Dirac points could serve as a practical search filter when screening large material databases for topological candidates.
  • The index might be extended to other crystal symmetries that also protect gap closings.
  • Spectroscopic observation of these Dirac cones could distinguish fragile from stable topology in the same sample.

Load-bearing premise

The index stays non-trivial and forces gap closings only when the system respects time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry and extra bands do not cancel the obstruction.

What would settle it

A two-dimensional material obeying time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry whose computed fragile index is non-zero yet whose band structure shows no gap-closing points at the predicted locations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17870 by Cosma Fulga, Ihor Nimyi, Jasper van Wezel, Jeroen van den Brink, Oleg Janson, Viktor K\"onye.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Topologically distinct phases of the Hamiltonian in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The spectrum of concentric square Wilson loops (blue) and the corresponding Euler loop (orange) for the Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dirac cones enforced by fragile topology in MoAg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic figure for the change of the Euler class by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The different gauges used to patch together the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dirac cones enforced by fragile topology in Au [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dirac cones enforced by fragile topology in Au [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dirac cones enforced by fragile topology in MoOBrCl, using the same conventions as Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dirac cones enforced by fragile topology in PdIr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Some topological phases of matter are called fragile. They do not generically host protected gapless boundary states and they can be trivialized by adding additional valence bands. Here we show that fragile topology nevertheless has robust signatures: it yields bulk Dirac cones in two-dimensional materials with arbitrarily many bands. In systems with time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry, we establish a fragile topological index which guarantees the presence of gap closing points in the band structure. We test this prediction using first-principles calculations in five materials and find that all of them host such Dirac points, suggesting that this is a widespread phenomenon. Our results provide a robust spectroscopic signature of fragile topology which can be directly accessed in experiment. Further, they enable an alternate method for finding Dirac cones in ab-initio simulations, and may be used as a route towards identifying materials with nonlinear transport properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in 2D materials respecting time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetry, a fragile topological index can be defined that guarantees the presence of bulk Dirac points (gap closings) even when the system has arbitrarily many bands. This is supported by first-principles calculations on five materials, all of which exhibit such Dirac points, providing a proposed robust spectroscopic signature of fragile topology.

Significance. If the result holds, the work supplies a bulk experimental signature for fragile topology and an alternate route to locating Dirac cones in simulations, with possible relevance to nonlinear transport. The multi-material verification adds weight to the claim that the phenomenon is widespread.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and index definition section] Abstract and the section defining the index: the central claim that the index 'guarantees' gap closings for arbitrarily many bands is load-bearing, yet the explicit construction of the index and the demonstration that band addition cannot trivialize it without forcing a gap closing are not provided in sufficient detail for verification.
  2. [Section establishing the guarantee] The section establishing the guarantee under TR + C2: the argument must explicitly rule out the possibility that additional valence bands trivialize the index while the gap remains open, as this directly addresses whether the 'arbitrarily many bands' protection holds.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures showing band structures] The band-structure figures would benefit from explicit labeling of high-symmetry points and indication of the computed gap-closing locations.
  2. [Materials section] A short table summarizing the five materials, their space groups, and the computed Dirac-point locations would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying areas where additional detail would strengthen the presentation. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and index definition section] Abstract and the section defining the index: the central claim that the index 'guarantees' gap closings for arbitrarily many bands is load-bearing, yet the explicit construction of the index and the demonstration that band addition cannot trivialize it without forcing a gap closing are not provided in sufficient detail for verification.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit construction and the proof of stability under band addition require more detail for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand the index-definition section to include the full mathematical construction of the fragile index from the C2 and TR symmetry representations, together with a self-contained argument showing that any band addition that trivializes the index must induce a gap closing. This will be presented as a sequence of lemmas with explicit symmetry-indicator formulas. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section establishing the guarantee] The section establishing the guarantee under TR + C2: the argument must explicitly rule out the possibility that additional valence bands trivialize the index while the gap remains open, as this directly addresses whether the 'arbitrarily many bands' protection holds.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit exclusion of gap-preserving trivialization by added bands is necessary to substantiate the claim for arbitrarily many bands. The revised version will contain a dedicated subsection that directly addresses this point: we will prove that, under the assumed symmetries, a non-trivial value of the index cannot be canceled by additional valence bands without forcing at least one gap closing. The argument will be formulated in terms of the obstruction in the equivariant K-theory group and will be cross-checked against the five DFT examples. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: index is independent construction validated externally

full rationale

The paper defines a fragile topological index under time-reversal and C2 symmetry that is claimed to guarantee gap closings for arbitrarily many bands. This index is presented as a theoretical construction whose predictions are then tested against independent first-principles calculations on five real materials. No equations or self-citations reduce the guarantee to a definition of the Dirac points themselves, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a well-defined fragile topological index under TR and C2 symmetries; the abstract does not list explicit free parameters or invented entities, and the symmetries are standard domain assumptions in topological band theory.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Time-reversal and twofold rotation symmetries are preserved in the target 2D materials.
    Invoked when defining the fragile topological index that guarantees gap closings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1172 out tokens · 29482 ms · 2026-06-26T22:54:23.442695+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Kitaev, V

    A. Kitaev, V. Lebedev, and M. Feigel’man, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, inAIP Conf. Proc.(AIP, 2009) p. 22–30

    2009

  4. [4]

    P. W. Brouwer and V. Dwivedi, Homotopic classifica- tion of band structures: Stable, fragile, delicate, and sta- ble representation-protected topology, Phys. Rev. B108, 155137 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, and A. Vishwanath, Fragile Topology and Wannier Obstructions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 126402 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, Y.-F. Xu, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Fragile Phases as Affine Monoids: Classifica- tion and Material Examples, Phys. Rev. X10, 031001 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Bouhon, T

    A. Bouhon, T. Bzduˇ sek, and R.-J. Slager, Geometric ap- proach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators, Phys. Rev. B102, 115135 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    K. Y. Lee, S. Wong, S. Vaidya, T. A. Loring, and A. Cer- jan, Classification of fragile topology enabled by matrix homotopy, Phys. Rev. Research7, 033235 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantiza- tion of fractional corner charge inC n-symmetric higher- order topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    B. J. Wieder, Z. Wang, J. Cano, X. Dai, L. M. Schoop, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Strong and fragile topo- logical Dirac semimetals with higher-order Fermi arcs, Nat. Commun.11, 627 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    S. Kooi, G. van Miert, and C. Ortix, The bulk-corner cor- respondence of time-reversal symmetric insulators, npj Quantum Mater.6, 1 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bulk-boundary correspondence of fragile topology, Sci- ence367, 794–797 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 12233–12237 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80–84 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    B. Lian, F. Xie, and B. A. Bernevig, Landau level of fragile topology, Phys. Rev. B102, 041402 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Y. Guan, A. Bouhon, and O. V. Yazyev, Landau levels of the Euler class topology, Phys. Rev. Research4, 023188 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Kobayashi and A

    S. Kobayashi and A. Furusaki, Fragile topological insula- tors protected by rotation symmetry without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B104, 195114 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    M. Sato, S. Kobayashi, M. Hirayama, and A. Furusaki, Three-dimensional spinless Euler insulators with rota- tional symmetry, Phys. Rev. B112, 195108 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Tanaka and S

    Y. Tanaka and S. Kobayashi, Euler band topology and multiple hinge modes in three-dimensional insulators, arXiv:2603.26271 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Peri, Z.-D

    V. Peri, Z.-D. Song, M. Serra-Garcia, P. Engeler, R. Queiroz, X. Huang, W. Deng, Z. Liu, B. A. Bernevig, and S. D. Huber, Experimental characterization of frag- ile topology in an acoustic metamaterial, Science367, 797–800 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Zhao, Y.-B

    W. Zhao, Y.-B. Yang, Y. Jiang, Z. Mao, W. Guo, L. Qiu, G. Wang, L. Yao, L. He, Z. Zhou, Y. Xu, and L. Duan, Quantum simulation for topological Euler insu- lators, Commun. Phys.5, 223 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Jiang, A

    B. Jiang, A. Bouhon, S.-Q. Wu, Z.-L. Kong, Z.-K. Lin, R.-J. Slager, and J.-H. Jiang, Observation of an acoustic topological Euler insulator with meronic waves, Sci. Bull. 69, 1653–1659 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Wu, Z.-K

    Y. Wu, Z.-K. Lin, Y. Yang, Z. Song, F. Li, and J.-H. Jiang, Probing fragile topology with dislocations, Sci. Bull.69, 3657–3660 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Bradlyn, Z

    B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, J. Cano, and B. A. Bernevig, Dis- connected elementary band representations, fragile topol- ogy, and Wilson loops as topological indices: An example on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 045140 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Bouhon, A

    A. Bouhon, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and R.-J. Slager, Wil- son loop approach to fragile topology of split elemen- tary band representations and topological crystalline in- sulators with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B100, 195135 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Henke, M

    J. Henke, M. Kurttutan, J. Kruthoff, and J. van Wezel, Topological invariants of rotationally symmetric crystals, Phys. Rev. B104, L201110 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    X. Li, L. Eek, J. van Wezel, and C. M. Smith, Frag- ile topology for six-fold rotation symmetry indicated by the concentric Wilson loop spectrum, arXiv:2603.24412 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    F. N. ¨Unal, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Topological Eu- ler Class as a Dynamical Observable in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 053601 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    J. Ahn, S. Park, and B.-J. Yang, Failure of Nielsen- Ninomiya Theorem and Fragile Topology in Two- Dimensional Systems with Space-Time Inversion Symme- try: Application to Twisted Bilayer Graphene at Magic Angle, Phys. Rev. X9, 021013 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Haastrup, M

    S. Haastrup, M. Strange, M. Pandey, T. Deilmann, P. S. Schmidt, N. F. Hinsche, M. N. Gjerding, D. Torelli, P. M. Larsen, A. C. Riis-Jensen, J. Gath, K. W. Jacobsen, J. Jørgen Mortensen, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals, 2D Mater.5, 042002 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    M. N. Gjerding, A. Taghizadeh, A. Rasmussen, S. Ali, F. Bertoldo, T. Deilmann, N. R. Knøsgaard, M. Kruse, A. H. Larsen, S. Manti, T. G. Pedersen, U. Petralanda, T. Skovhus, M. K. Svendsen, J. J. Mortensen, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Recent progress of the Computa- tional 2D Materials Database (C2DB), 2D Materials8, 044002 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    J. A. Sobota, Y. He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025006 (2021). 15

    2021

  34. [34]

    Gresch, G

    D. Gresch, G. Aut` es, O. V. Yazyev, M. Troyer, D. Van- derbilt, B. A. Bernevig, and A. A. Soluyanov, Z2Pack: Numerical implementation of hybrid Wannier centers for identifying topological materials, Phys. Rev. B95, 075146 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal In- variant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    Y. X. Zhao and Y. Lu, PT-Symmetric Real Dirac Fermions and Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 056401 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    Bouhon, Q

    A. Bouhon, Q. Wu, R.-J. Slager, H. Weng, O. V. Yazyev, and T. Bzduˇ sek, Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe, Nat. Phys.16, 1137–1143 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Jiang, A

    B. Jiang, A. Bouhon, Z.-K. Lin, X. Zhou, B. Hou, F. Li, R.-J. Slager, and J.-H. Jiang, Experimental observation of non-Abelian topological acoustic semimetals and their phase transitions, Nat. Phys.17, 1239–1246 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Bouhon, and F. N. ¨Unal, Non-Abelian Floquet braiding and anomalous Dirac string phase in periodically driven systems, Nat. Commun.15, 1144 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Breach, R.-J

    O. Breach, R.-J. Slager, and F. N. ¨Unal, Interferome- try of Non-Abelian Band Singularities and Euler Class Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093404 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    S. H. Lee, Y. Qian, and B.-J. Yang, Euler band topology in spin-orbit coupled magnetic systems, arXiv:2404.16383 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    R. Yu, X. L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Equiv- alent expression ofZ 2 topological invariant for band in- sulators using the non-Abelian Berry connection, Phys. Rev. B84, 075119 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Itani, Y

    S. Itani, Y. Zhang, and J. Zang, The northeast materials database for magnetic materials, Nat. Commun.16, 9415 (2025). [44]https://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk/material/1SAu2O4-1. [45]https://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk/material/ 1InAu3Br4O4-1. [46]https://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk/material/2BrClMoO-1. [47]https://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk/material/1MoAg2Te4-1. [48]https://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk/...

    2025

  44. [44]

    K¨ onye, I

    V. K¨ onye, I. Nimyi, O. Janson, J. van den Brink, J. van Wezel, and C. Fulga, Robust signatures of fragile topol- ogy, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20020781 (2026)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20020781 2026

  45. [45]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys.16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    A. Lau, J. van den Brink, and C. Ortix, Topological mir- ror insulators in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B94, 165164 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological Classification of Crystalline In- sulators through Band Structure Combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X7, 041069 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  49. [49]

    Koepernik and H

    K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthog- onal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme, Phys. Rev. B59, 1743 (1999)

    1999

  50. [50]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  51. [51]

    H. T. Stokes and D. M. Hatch, Program for identifying the space group symmetry of a crystal, J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 237 (2005)

    2005

  52. [52]

    Koepernik, O

    K. Koepernik, O. Janson, Y. Sun, and J. van den Brink, Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wan- nier functions, Phys. Rev. B107, 235135 (2023)

    2023