pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18840 · v1 · pith:2EGZH6WInew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Field Demonstration of a Multi-User Continuous-Variable Quantum Access Network for Quantum-to-the-Home

Junpeng Zhang , Xu Liu , Qijun Zhang , Yifeng Liang , Yue Yu , Peng Huang , Huasheng Li , Yingming Zhou
show 7 more authors
Jingyu Yang Chunchen Li Yunfan Chen Cheng Zheng Ciqing Deng Tao Wang Guihua Zeng
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum access networkcontinuous-variable quantum key distributionmulti-user networkfield trialquantum-to-the-homesecure key ratecommercial fibertrusted network domain
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 1:16 field trial achieves Mbit/s-level asymptotic secure key rates in a multi-user continuous-variable quantum access network over commercial fiber.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how link asymmetry in broadcast continuous-variable quantum access networks can be overcome for practical Quantum-to-the-Home use. It operates inside a trusted local network domain and applies a multi-user utility model to pick one shared modulation variance that balances overall efficiency with fairness across users. Robust digital signal processing then supports the downstream broadcast setup connecting one Quantum Line Terminal to multiple Quantum Network Units. The resulting 1:16 trial over real fiber reaches Mbit/s secure key rates, turning theoretical multi-user protocols into a working fiber-to-the-home configuration.

Core claim

The paper establishes that a downstream broadcast continuous-variable quantum access network can deliver Mbit/s-level asymptotic secure key rates in a 1:16 field trial over commercial fiber by using a multi-user utility model to select an optimal shared modulation variance inside a trusted local network domain, thereby balancing network efficiency and user fairness.

What carries the argument

The multi-user utility model that selects one globally optimal shared modulation variance to balance efficiency and fairness.

If this is right

  • Multi-user continuous-variable quantum access networks become feasible for broadcast operation over existing commercial fiber.
  • Mbit/s-level secure key rates are attainable in a 1:16 configuration under real-world conditions.
  • A single shared modulation variance chosen by the utility model suffices for both network efficiency and user fairness.
  • Digital signal processing can be made robust enough to support the full downstream broadcast architecture.
  • The demonstration supplies concrete guidance for designing larger-scale Quantum-to-the-Home access networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same utility-model approach could be tested at higher splitting ratios to check scalability limits.
  • Similar field trials could measure how the trusted-domain assumption affects coexistence with classical traffic on the same fiber.
  • Per-user variance tuning might become unnecessary in other multi-user quantum protocols if the trusted-domain premise holds.
  • Key-rate gains from improved signal processing could be quantified by re-running the trial with upgraded DSP blocks.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that a trusted local network domain allows selection of one globally optimal shared modulation variance without security vulnerabilities or per-user adjustments.

What would settle it

A repeat of the 1:16 field trial in which measured asymptotic secure key rates fall below Mbit/s levels or security is lost when the shared variance is applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18840 by Cheng Zheng, Chunchen Li, Ciqing Deng, Guihua Zeng, Huasheng Li, Jingyu Yang, Junpeng Zhang, Peng Huang, Qijun Zhang, Tao Wang, Xu Liu, Yifeng Liang, Yingming Zhou, Yue Yu, Yunfan Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Field-deployed downstream broadcast CV-QANs and its practical multi-user model. The upper panel shows the real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SKR versus shared modulation variance under asym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Optical setup of the downstream broadcast CV-QANs. The QLT generates GMCS and sends them through a 4.08km [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Excess noise data plots for six users. The horizontal dotted line represents the average excess noise for each user. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimental results of CV-QAN. The blue line, red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Realizing scalable Quantum-to-the-Home (QTTH) faces a bottleneck: link asymmetry in broadcast continuous-variable quantum access networks (CV-QANs) hinders the selection of a globally optimal modulation variance. We demonstrate a downstream broadcast CV-QAN connecting a Quantum Line Terminal (QLT) to multiple Quantum Network Units (QNUs) over commercial fiber. Operating within a trusted local network domain, we establish a multi-user utility model to select the optimal shared variance, balancing network efficiency and user fairness. Supported by robust digital signal processing, our 1:16 field trial achieves Mbit/s-level asymptotic secure key rates, bridging theoretical protocols with Fiber-to-the-Home reality and guiding future scalable access architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a field demonstration of a downstream 1:16 broadcast continuous-variable quantum access network (CV-QAN) over commercial fiber, connecting a Quantum Line Terminal to multiple Quantum Network Units. Within a trusted local network domain, a multi-user utility model is used to select a single shared modulation variance that balances efficiency and fairness, enabling Mbit/s-level asymptotic secure key rates despite link asymmetry.

Significance. If the central security and performance claims hold, the work is significant for bridging theoretical CV-QKD protocols with practical Fiber-to-the-Home deployments. It supplies experimental evidence that a utility-model approach can handle broadcast asymmetry in a multi-user setting and offers concrete guidance for scalable QTTH architectures. The use of commercial fiber and robust DSP is a practical strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Security analysis] Security analysis section: the claim that the trusted-domain utility model permits a globally optimal shared variance without invalidating per-user Holevo bounds is load-bearing for the key-rate results, yet the manuscript does not explicitly derive or verify that the chosen variance preserves the individual security bounds under unequal downstream losses (see the skeptic note on link asymmetry). A concrete check against the CV-QKD security proof is required.
  2. [Results] Results section, key-rate table or figure: the abstract states Mbit/s asymptotic rates but the provided text supplies no numerical values, error bars, or exclusion criteria; the central performance claim cannot be evaluated without these data and the explicit mapping from measured parameters to the reported rates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions: several panels lack explicit labels for the different QNUs or loss values, making it difficult to correlate the utility-model output with individual link performance.
  2. [Methods] Notation: the definition of the multi-user utility function should be stated as an equation rather than described only in prose to allow direct comparison with standard CV-QKD variance optimization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of both the security analysis and the experimental results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Security analysis] Security analysis section: the claim that the trusted-domain utility model permits a globally optimal shared variance without invalidating per-user Holevo bounds is load-bearing for the key-rate results, yet the manuscript does not explicitly derive or verify that the chosen variance preserves the individual security bounds under unequal downstream losses (see the skeptic note on link asymmetry). A concrete check against the CV-QKD security proof is required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is necessary to fully substantiate the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection that derives the preservation of individual Holevo bounds under the shared variance chosen by the utility model. The derivation starts from the standard Gaussian CV-QKD security proof, incorporates the trusted-domain assumption, and shows that the common variance remains compatible with per-user security even when downstream losses differ. We include a concrete numerical verification using the measured loss values from the field trial. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section, key-rate table or figure: the abstract states Mbit/s asymptotic rates but the provided text supplies no numerical values, error bars, or exclusion criteria; the central performance claim cannot be evaluated without these data and the explicit mapping from measured parameters to the reported rates.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical values, error bars, and explicit mapping were not sufficiently prominent in the text. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated results table that reports the achieved asymptotic key rates together with their statistical uncertainties, the exclusion criteria applied to the data, and the step-by-step mapping from the measured quadrature variances, channel transmittances, and excess noise to the final key rates via the Devetak-Winter bound adapted for the multi-user setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental 1:16 field trial of a downstream broadcast CV-QAN over commercial fiber, achieving Mbit/s asymptotic secure key rates via a multi-user utility model that selects a shared modulation variance inside a trusted local network domain. The central result is an empirical demonstration supported by DSP, with key rates derived from measured data using standard CV-QKD Holevo bounds rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces the reported rates or the utility model to its own inputs by construction; the derivation remains self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The trusted-domain premise is the main background assumption invoked to justify the utility-model approach.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Operation within a trusted local network domain
    Allows the utility model to select a single shared variance without additional security analysis for untrusted central node.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1265 out tokens · 27894 ms · 2026-06-26T20:36:48.132761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead.Science, 362(6412):eaam9288, 2018

    Stephanie Wehner, David Elkouss, and Ronald Hanson. Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead.Science, 362(6412):eaam9288, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Advances in quantum cryptography.Advances in optics and photonics, 12(4):1012–1236, 2020

    Stefano Pirandola, Ulrik L Andersen, Leonardo Banchi, Mario Berta, Darius Bunandar, Roger Colbeck, Dirk En- glund, Tobias Gehring, Cosmo Lupo, Carlo Ottaviani, et al. Advances in quantum cryptography.Advances in optics and photonics, 12(4):1012–1236, 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    Quantum cryptography.Reviews of modern physics, 74(1):145, 2002

    Nicolas Gisin, Grégoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden. Quantum cryptography.Reviews of modern physics, 74(1):145, 2002

    2002

  4. [4]

    Quantum cryptography: a view from classical cryptography.Quantum science and technology, 2(2):020502, 2017

    Johannes Buchmann, Johannes Braun, Denise Demirel, and Matthias Geihs. Quantum cryptography: a view from classical cryptography.Quantum science and technology, 2(2):020502, 2017

    2017

  5. [5]

    Quantum cryptog- raphy: Public key distribution and coin tossing.Theoretical computer science, 560:7–11, 2014

    Charles H Bennett and Gilles Brassard. Quantum cryptog- raphy: Public key distribution and coin tossing.Theoretical computer science, 560:7–11, 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    A single quantum cannot be cloned.Nature, 299(5886):802–803, 1982

    William K Wootters and Wojciech H Zurek. A single quantum cannot be cloned.Nature, 299(5886):802–803, 1982

    1982

  7. [7]

    Information exclusion principle for complementary observables.Physical review letters, 74 (17):3307, 1995

    Michael JW Hall. Information exclusion principle for complementary observables.Physical review letters, 74 (17):3307, 1995

    1995

  8. [8]

    The quantum internet.Nature, 453(7198): 1023–1030, 2008

    H JeffKimble. The quantum internet.Nature, 453(7198): 1023–1030, 2008

    2008

  9. [9]

    Decoy state quantum key distribution.Physical review letters, 94 (23):230504, 2005

    Hoi-Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma, and Kai Chen. Decoy state quantum key distribution.Physical review letters, 94 (23):230504, 2005

    2005

  10. [10]

    Measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution.Physical review letters, 108(13):130503, 2012

    Hoi-Kwong Lo, Marcos Curty, and Bing Qi. Measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution.Physical review letters, 108(13):130503, 2012

    2012

  11. [11]

    Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters

    Marco Lucamarini, Zhiliang L Yuan, James F Dynes, and Andrew J Shields. Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature, 557(7705):400–403, 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states.Physical review letters, 96(7):070502, 2006

    Yi Zhao, Bing Qi, Xiongfeng Ma, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Li Qian. Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states.Physical review letters, 96(7):070502, 2006

    2006

  13. [13]

    Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber.Physical review letters, 121(19):190502, 2018

    Alberto Boaron, Gianluca Boso, Davide Rusca, Cédric Vulliez, Claire Autebert, Misael Caloz, Matthieu Perre- noud, Gaëtan Gras, Félix Bussières, Ming-Jun Li, et al. Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber.Physical review letters, 121(19):190502, 2018

    2018

  14. [14]

    A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users.Nature, 607(7920):687–691, 2022

    Wei Zhang, Tim van Leent, Kai Redeker, Robert Garthoff, René Schwonnek, Florian Fertig, Sebastian Eppelt, Wen- jamin Rosenfeld, Valerio Scarani, Charles C-W Lim, et al. A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users.Nature, 607(7920):687–691, 2022

    2022

  15. [15]

    Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity.New Journal of Physics, 11(4):045018, 2009

    Masato Koashi. Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity.New Journal of Physics, 11(4):045018, 2009

    2009

  16. [16]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution

    Valerio Scarani, Helle Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Nicolas J Cerf, Miloslav Dušek, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Momtchil Peev. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Reviews of modern physics, 81(3):1301–1350, 2009

    2009

  17. [17]

    Continuous variable entanglement swapping.Physical review letters, 83(11): 2095, 1999

    RES Polkinghorne and TC Ralph. Continuous variable entanglement swapping.Physical review letters, 83(11): 2095, 1999

    2095

  18. [18]

    Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states.Phys- ical review letters, 88(5):057902, 2002

    Frédéric Grosshans and Philippe Grangier. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states.Phys- ical review letters, 88(5):057902, 2002

    2002

  19. [19]

    Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution.Nature photonics, 7(5):378–381, 2013

    Paul Jouguet, Sébastien Kunz-Jacques, Anthony Lever- rier, Philippe Grangier, and Eleni Diamanti. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution.Nature photonics, 7(5):378–381, 2013. Preprint– FieldDemonstration of aMulti-UserContinuous-VariableQuantumAccessNetwork forQuantum-to-the-Home9

    2013

  20. [20]

    Security of continuous-variable quan- tum cryptography.Physical review A, 62(6):062306, 2000

    Timothy C Ralph. Security of continuous-variable quan- tum cryptography.Physical review A, 62(6):062306, 2000

    2000

  21. [21]

    Reverse recon- ciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continu- ous variables.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0204127, 2002

    Frédéric Grosshans and Philippe Grangier. Reverse recon- ciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continu- ous variables.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0204127, 2002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  22. [22]

    Quan- tum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states.Nature, 421(6920):238–241, 2003

    Frédéric Grosshans, Gilles Van Assche, Jérôme Wenger, Rosa Brouri, Nicolas J Cerf, and Philippe Grangier. Quan- tum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states.Nature, 421(6920):238–241, 2003

    2003

  23. [23]

    Gaussian quantum information

    Christian Weedbrook, Stefano Pirandola, Raúl García- Patrón, Nicolas J Cerf, Timothy C Ralph, Jeffrey H Shapiro, and Seth Lloyd. Gaussian quantum information. Reviews of modern physics, 84(2):621–669, 2012

    2012

  24. [24]

    Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution over 202.81 km of fiber

    Yichen Zhang, Ziyang Chen, Stefano Pirandola, Xiangyu Wang, Chao Zhou, Binjie Chu, Yijia Zhao, Bingjie Xu, Song Yu, and Hong Guo. Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution over 202.81 km of fiber. Physical review letters, 125(1):010502, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Composable security proof for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with coher- ent states.Physical review letters, 114(7):070501, 2015

    Anthony Leverrier. Composable security proof for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with coher- ent states.Physical review letters, 114(7):070501, 2015

    2015

  26. [26]

    Experimental demonstration of continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion over optical fiber.Optica, 9(5):492–500, 2022

    Yan Tian, Pu Wang, Jianqiang Liu, Shanna Du, Wenyuan Liu, Zhenguo Lu, Xuyang Wang, and Yongmin Li. Experimental demonstration of continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion over optical fiber.Optica, 9(5):492–500, 2022

    2022

  27. [27]

    Metropolitan all-pass and inter-city quantum communication network.Optics express, 18(26):27217– 27225, 2010

    Teng-Yun Chen, Jian Wang, Hao Liang, Wei-Yue Liu, Yang Liu, Xiao Jiang, Yuan Wang, Xu Wan, Wen-Qi Cai, Lei Ju, et al. Metropolitan all-pass and inter-city quantum communication network.Optics express, 18(26):27217– 27225, 2010

    2010

  28. [28]

    Field test of wavelength- saving quantum key distribution network.Optics letters, 35(14):2454–2456, 2010

    Shuang Wang, Wei Chen, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Yang Zhang, Tao Zhang, Hong-Wei Li, Fang-Xing Xu, Zheng Zhou, Yang Yang, Da-Jun Huang, et al. Field test of wavelength- saving quantum key distribution network.Optics letters, 35(14):2454–2456, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    Large scale quantum key distribution: challenges and solutions.Optics express, 26(18):24260– 24273, 2018

    Qiang Zhang, Feihu Xu, Yu-Ao Chen, Cheng-Zhi Peng, and Jian-Wei Pan. Large scale quantum key distribution: challenges and solutions.Optics express, 26(18):24260– 24273, 2018

    2018

  30. [30]

    Measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution over untrust- ful metropolitan network.Physical Review X, 6(1):011024, 2016

    Yan-Lin Tang, Hua-Lei Yin, Qi Zhao, Hui Liu, Xiang- Xiang Sun, Ming-Qi Huang, Wei-Jun Zhang, Si-Jing Chen, Lu Zhang, Li-Xing You, et al. Measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution over untrust- ful metropolitan network.Physical Review X, 6(1):011024, 2016

    2016

  31. [31]

    Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the florence metropolitan area.EPJ Quantum Technology, 6(1):5, 2019

    Davide Bacco, Ilaria Vagniluca, Beatrice Da Lio, Nicola Biagi, Adriano Della Frera, Davide Calonico, Costanza Toninelli, Francesco S Cataliotti, Marco Bellini, Leif K Oxenløwe, et al. Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the florence metropolitan area.EPJ Quantum Technology, 6(1):5, 2019

    2019

  32. [32]

    Field test of classical symmetric encryption with continuous variables quantum key distri- bution.Optics Express, 20(13):14030–14041, 2012

    Paul Jouguet, Sébastien Kunz-Jacques, Thierry Debuiss- chert, Simon Fossier, Eleni Diamanti, Romain Alléaume, Rosa Tualle-Brouri, Philippe Grangier, Anthony Leverrier, Philippe Pache, et al. Field test of classical symmetric encryption with continuous variables quantum key distri- bution.Optics Express, 20(13):14030–14041, 2012

    2012

  33. [33]

    Implementation of a 46-node quantum metropolitan area network.npj Quantum Infor- mation, 7(1):134, 2021

    Teng-Yun Chen, Xiao Jiang, Shi-Biao Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiao Yuan, Hongyi Zhou, Jian Wang, Yang Liu, Luo-Kan Chen, Wei-Yue Liu, et al. Implementation of a 46-node quantum metropolitan area network.npj Quantum Infor- mation, 7(1):134, 2021

    2021

  34. [34]

    Field demonstration of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution network

    Duan Huang, Peng Huang, Huasheng Li, Tao Wang, Ying- ming Zhou, and Guihua Zeng. Field demonstration of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution network. Optics letters, 41(15):3511–3514, 2016

    2016

  35. [35]

    Long-term performance of the swissquantum quantum key distribution network in a field environment.New Journal of Physics, 13(12):123001, 2011

    Damien Stucki, Matthieu Legre, Francois Buntschu, B Clausen, Nadine Felber, Nicolas Gisin, Luca Henzen, Pascal Junod, Gérald Litzistorf, Patrick Monbaron, et al. Long-term performance of the swissquantum quantum key distribution network in a field environment.New Journal of Physics, 13(12):123001, 2011

    2011

  36. [36]

    Field test of quantum key distribution in the tokyo qkd network.Optics express, 19(11):10387– 10409, 2011

    Masahide Sasaki, Mikio Fujiwara, H Ishizuka, W Klaus, K Wakui, M Takeoka, S Miki, T Yamashita, Z Wang, A Tanaka, et al. Field test of quantum key distribution in the tokyo qkd network.Optics express, 19(11):10387– 10409, 2011

    2011

  37. [37]

    Cambridge quantum network.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):101, 2019

    JF Dynes, Adrian Wonfor, WW-S Tam, AW Sharpe, R Takahashi, M Lucamarini, A Plews, ZL Yuan, AR Dixon, J Cho, et al. Cambridge quantum network.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):101, 2019

    2019

  38. [38]

    Passive optical networks: In- troduction, 2018

    Jose Antonio Altabas, Samael Sarmiento Hernández, and José Antonio Lázaro Villa. Passive optical networks: In- troduction, 2018

    2018

  39. [39]

    Quantum cryptography on multiuser optical fibre networks.Nature, 385(6611):47–49, 1997

    Paul D Townsend. Quantum cryptography on multiuser optical fibre networks.Nature, 385(6611):47–49, 1997

    1997

  40. [40]

    Quantum information to the home.New Journal of Physics, 13(6): 063039, 2011

    Iris Choi, Robert J Young, and Paul D Townsend. Quantum information to the home.New Journal of Physics, 13(6): 063039, 2011

    2011

  41. [41]

    Practical quantum access network over a 10 gbit/s ethernet passive optical network.Optics Express, 29(23): 38582–38590, 2021

    Bi-Xiao Wang, Shi-Biao Tang, Yingqiu Mao, Wenhua Xu, Ming Cheng, Jun Zhang, Teng-Yun Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan. Practical quantum access network over a 10 gbit/s ethernet passive optical network.Optics Express, 29(23): 38582–38590, 2021

    2021

  42. [42]

    A cost-efficient quantum access network with qubit-based synchronization

    Chunfeng Huang, Ye Chen, Tingting Luo, Wenjie He, Xin Liu, Zhenrong Zhang, and Kejin Wei. A cost-efficient quantum access network with qubit-based synchronization. Science China Physics, Mechanics&Astronomy, 67(4): 240312, 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Integrated quantum communica- tion network and vibration sensing in optical fibers.Optica, 11(12):1762–1772, 2024

    Shuaishuai Liu, Yan Tian, Yu Zhang, Zhenguo Lu, Xuyang Wang, and Yongmin Li. Integrated quantum communica- tion network and vibration sensing in optical fibers.Optica, 11(12):1762–1772, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Round-trip multi-band quantum access net- work.Photonics Research, 11(8):1449–1464, 2023

    Yuehan Xu, Tao Wang, Huanxi Zhao, Peng Huang, and Guihua Zeng. Round-trip multi-band quantum access net- work.Photonics Research, 11(8):1449–1464, 2023

    2023

  45. [45]

    Experimental upstream trans- mission of continuous variable quantum key distribution access network.Optics Letters, 48(12):3327–3330, 2023

    Xiangyu Wang, Ziyang Chen, Zhenghua Li, Dengke Qi, Song Yu, and Hong Guo. Experimental upstream trans- mission of continuous variable quantum key distribution access network.Optics Letters, 48(12):3327–3330, 2023

    2023

  46. [46]

    High-rate point-to-multipoint quantum key distribution using coherent states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02391, 2023

    Yiming Bian, Yi-Chen Zhang, Chao Zhou, Song Yu, Zhengyu Li, and Hong Guo. High-rate point-to-multipoint quantum key distribution using coherent states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02391, 2023. Preprint– FieldDemonstration of aMulti-UserContinuous-VariableQuantumAccessNetwork forQuantum-to-the-Home10

    arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Usenko, and Tobias Gehring

    Adnan AE Hajomer, Ivan Derkach, Radim Filip, Ulrik L Andersen, Vladyslav C. Usenko, and Tobias Gehring. Continuous-variable quantum passive optical network. Light: Science&Applications, 13(1):291, 2024

    2024

  48. [48]

    High- rate 16-node quantum access network based on a passive optical network.Optica, 12(7):953–960, 2025

    Yan Pan, Yiming Bian, Yang Li, Xuesong Xu, Li Ma, Heng Wang, Yujie Luo, Ting Ye, Yaodi Pi, Jie Yang, et al. High- rate 16-node quantum access network based on a passive optical network.Optica, 12(7):953–960, 2025

    2025

  49. [49]

    Approaching the key rate limit in continuous- variable quantum key distribution network.Physical Re- view Letters, 136(8):080801, 2026

    Yiming Bian, Yichen Zhang, Song Yu, Zhengyu Li, and Hong Guo. Approaching the key rate limit in continuous- variable quantum key distribution network.Physical Re- view Letters, 136(8):080801, 2026

    2026

  50. [50]

    High-rate continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 100 km fiber with composable security.Optica, 12 (10):1657–1667, 2025

    Heng Wang, Yang Li, Ting Ye, Li Ma, Yan Pan, Mingze Wu, Junhui Li, Yiming Bian, Yun Shao, Yaodi Pi, et al. High-rate continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 100 km fiber with composable security.Optica, 12 (10):1657–1667, 2025

    2025