pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19013 · v1 · pith:GVK3NFY3new · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Embedding Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in the WST Collaboration

Laurane Fr\'eour , Anna Puglisi , Maria Cristina Fortuna , Fatemeh Zahra Majidi , Umberto Rescigno , Amelia Bayo , Francesca Primas , Sabine Thater
show 6 more authors
Laurence Tresse Stephanie Escoffier Letizia P. Cassar\`a Roland Bacon Sofia Randich Vincenzo Mainieri
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords Equity Diversity InclusionWST collaborationastronomygovernancecommunity infrastructureworking groupunderrepresented groupssustainable research environments
0
0 comments X

The pith

The WST collaboration formed an EDI working group to integrate equity considerations into its governance and community infrastructure as a model for sustainable large research projects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the creation and first-year activities of an Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion working group in the Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope collaboration, a project with over 1000 members across many institutions and time zones. The group works to embed EDI into the early phases of governance, communication, and community building while the project addresses its technical goals. The authors present these efforts as an example of approaching EDI as part of the organizational infrastructure needed for sustainable research environments. Readers would care because the work targets underrepresentation of marginalized groups in astronomy leadership and offers a practical case from a next-generation telescope facility planned for the 2040s.

Core claim

The paper claims that establishing the EDI working group allows the WST collaboration to treat equity, diversity, and inclusion as integral to governance, communication, and community infrastructure, addressing social and organizational challenges in parallel with scientific and technical ones and providing a situated example for building sustainable research environments in large collaborations.

What carries the argument

The EDI working group, which embeds considerations into early collaboration phases and manages challenges such as recognition of contributions, uneven participation, and cross-group communication.

If this is right

  • EDI considerations are incorporated into the early phases of the WST project alongside its technical development.
  • Ongoing projects focus on broadening participation, accountability, and community sustainability.
  • Reflections on challenges such as recognition of EDI work and communication across heterogeneous groups inform adjustments to sustain the effort.
  • Facility-level EDI initiatives are connected to broader organizational and territorial responsibilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other large astronomy or STEM collaborations could form similar working groups during their formation stages.
  • Creating explicit metrics for tracking changes in participation would strengthen future claims about the group's effectiveness.
  • The tension between facility-level actions and wider institutional responsibilities may require dedicated coordination roles in comparable projects.

Load-bearing premise

The described working group activities will produce measurable broadening of participation and accountability even though no supporting evaluation data is presented.

What would settle it

A later assessment of the WST collaboration that finds no increase in representation of marginalized groups in leadership or decision-making roles after five years would show the approach has not delivered its intended outcomes.

read the original abstract

The proposed Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) is a next-generation telescope facility with a 12-meter primary mirror that may be operational in the 2040s. The project has a broad range of scientific goals and engages a large Community of more than 1000 members across multiple time zones, institutions, career stages, and professional roles. As for any large-scale scientific collaboration, building WST is therefore not only a technical and scientific challenge, but also a social and organisational one. This is particularly important in Astronomy and STEM disciplines more broadly, where marginalized groups remain underrepresented, particularly in leadership positions. In this paper, we describe the creation and first year of activity of the WST Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) working group. We discuss how the group has worked to embed EDI considerations into the early phases of the Collaboration, and we present our ongoing and future projects aimed at broadening participation, accountability, and community sustainability, while delivering groundbreaking science. We also reflect on the challenges of sustaining EDI work in a large and rapidly evolving collaboration, including recognition of EDI contribution, uneven participation, communication across heterogeneous groups, and the need to connect facility-level initiatives with broader organisational and territorial responsibilities. We present our activities as a situated example of how EDI can be approached as part of the governance, communication, and community infrastructure required to build sustainable research environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper describes the creation and first-year activities of the WST Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) working group within the proposed Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope collaboration. It outlines integration of EDI into governance and community infrastructure, presents ongoing projects for broadening participation and accountability, and reflects on challenges including recognition of contributions, uneven participation, cross-group communication, and connecting facility-level efforts to broader responsibilities. The authors frame the work as a situated example of embedding EDI considerations to support sustainable research environments in large, multi-institutional astronomical projects.

Significance. The manuscript provides a practical, descriptive case study of EDI implementation in a large international collaboration of over 1000 members. Its value lies in detailing concrete governance and community-building steps alongside acknowledged challenges, offering a template that other projects could adapt. The paper explicitly positions its contribution as an example rather than a validated intervention, which aligns with its scope and avoids unsubstantiated effectiveness claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract states the goal of 'broadening participation' but the body presents this as an aim of future projects rather than a demonstrated outcome; a brief clarifying sentence in the introduction would prevent any misreading of scope.
  2. [Throughout] Section headings and subheadings could be made more parallel (e.g., consistent use of 'Activities,' 'Challenges,' 'Future Plans') to improve navigation for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The report accurately captures the paper's scope as a descriptive case study of early EDI integration in a large collaboration.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a purely descriptive report on the creation and first-year activities of the WST EDI working group. It advances no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes. The central claim is a self-contained narrative of organizational efforts framed as one situated example; no step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, self-citations, or renamed empirical patterns. This is the most common honest finding for non-derivational reports.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a descriptive organizational report with no mathematical model, empirical fitting, or theoretical derivation; therefore no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities apply.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 995 out tokens · 19717 ms · 2026-06-26T19:23:47.016122+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    responding to consumers' and investors' expectations, many obstacles remain on the path to EDI, even at the very early stages of entering the labor market. For example, people with disabilities and foreign-born women tended to be 24% and 18% less employed than people without disabilities and foreign-born men within the European Union in 2024, respectively

    2024

  2. [2]

    Complete statistics on discrimination and biases across academic careers are unfortunately less available

    Challenges extend way beyond employability and are also related to the every-day reality that individuals experience within their working environment, ultimately affecting how meaningfully they can engage and contribute. Complete statistics on discrimination and biases across academic careers are unfortunately less available. However, gender balance analy...

    2022

  3. [3]

    General Facilities

    THE WST EDI WORKING GROUP 2.1 Group creation and composition The WST is a concept study for a next-generation telescope, entirely dedicated to spectroscopic surveys. Combining a large field of view, a high-multiplex and a giant integral field spectrograph, it will collect hundreds of millions of spectra of galaxies and stars, revealing the Universe in unp...

    2023

  4. [4]

    how ‑ to

    was then developed as a practical tool to translate these values into shared expectations, guidance, and accountability mechanisms with support from the Project Manager and Project Office, and with input from the Steering Committee in the final stages of the document development. This document is viewed as a tool to empower every member of the wide and di...

    2025

  5. [5]

    Missione Solar-C EUVST-Supporto scientifico di Fase B/C/D

    CONCLUSIONS In this article, we reported on the creation of the EDI working group in the WST Collaboration, which provides a situated example of how EDI can be approached as part of the governance, communication and community infrastructure within a large scientific collaboration. We discussed our ongoing and future projects, as well as the challenges we ...

    2021

  6. [6]

    Diversity wins: How inclusion matters

    McKinsey report, “Diversity wins: How inclusion matters”, 2020.Link

    2020

  7. [7]

    Gomez & Bernet, Diversity improves performance and outcomes, 2019, Link

    2019

  8. [8]

    The company of the future: Integrating sustainability, growth, and profitability in contemporary business models

    Zopounidis and Lemonakis, “The company of the future: Integrating sustainability, growth, and profitability in contemporary business models”, 2024, Link

    2024

  9. [9]

    She Figures 2024: Gender in research and innovation

    European Commission, “She Figures 2024: Gender in research and innovation”,

    2024

  10. [10]

    The JWST Early Release Observations

    Pontoppidan et al. “The JWST Early Release Observations”, 2022, DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e 2022

  11. [11]

    WST - Widefield Spectroscopic Telescope: motivation, science drivers and top level requirements for a new dedicated facility

    Bacon, R. et al., “WST - Widefield Spectroscopic Telescope: motivation, science drivers and top level requirements for a new dedicated facility”, 2024, Link

    2024

  12. [12]

    The Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) Science White Paper

    Mainieri, V. et al., “The Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) Science White Paper”, 2024, Link

    2024

  13. [13]

    The WST Code of Conduct, 2025, Link

    2025

  14. [14]

    Five actions for HR to engage other leaders on EDI

    CIPD, “Five actions for HR to engage other leaders on EDI”, 2022, Link

    2022

  15. [15]

    Fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace

    European Commission, “Fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace”, 2026 Link

    2026

  16. [16]

    Walking the walk?

    CMI, “Walking the walk? ”, 2024, Link

    2024

  17. [17]

    Diversity-Specific Empowering Leadership: An Alternative Approach to Reducing Sex-Based Bias and Enabling Inclusivity

    Scheuer et al. “Diversity-Specific Empowering Leadership: An Alternative Approach to Reducing Sex-Based Bias and Enabling Inclusivity”, 2025, Link

    2025

  18. [18]

    Lawson, David Dyer “Building a Methodological Framework for Establishing a Socio-Economic Business Case for Inclusion: The Curb Cut Effect of Accessibility Accommodations as a Confounding Variable and a Criterion Variable.” (2015) Link

    2015

  19. [19]

    Astronomy for All: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within the Chilean astronomical community

    Puglisi, Building safe spaces for a community of diverse astronomers , Presentation for ESO “Astronomy for All: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within the Chilean astronomical community” workshop, 2025, Link

    2025

  20. [20]

    Designing the Community Infrastructure for ESO's Next Transformational Facility. Equitable Governance and Sustainable Teams for 2040s Astronomy

    Puglisi et al. “Designing the Community Infrastructure for ESO's Next Transformational Facility. Equitable Governance and Sustainable Teams for 2040s Astronomy”, 2026, Link

    2026

  21. [21]

    Fiorellino, E., EduINAF, ``Building a fair and sustainable future for Astrophysics’’, 2026, Link

    2026

  22. [22]

    Leaning in together? A review of men's allyship in promoting gender equality in organizations from an ambivalence perspective

    Kark, R. & Buengeler, C. “Leaning in together? A review of men's allyship in promoting gender equality in organizations from an ambivalence perspective.”, 2026, Link

    2026

  23. [23]

    MANdatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress

    Van Laar C, et al. “MANdatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress.”, 2024, Link

    2024

  24. [24]

    The Inclusive Leader, the Smart Strategist and the Forced Altruist: Subject Positions for Men as Gender Equality Partners

    Kelan, E. K. “The Inclusive Leader, the Smart Strategist and the Forced Altruist: Subject Positions for Men as Gender Equality Partners.”, 2020, Link

    2020

  25. [25]

    Emotional Labor: Institutional Responsibility and Strategies to Offer Emotional Support for Leaders Engaging in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Work

    Ueda, N. et. al. “Emotional Labor: Institutional Responsibility and Strategies to Offer Emotional Support for Leaders Engaging in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Work.”, 2024 Link

    2024

  26. [26]

    Jones et al., Overview of SDSS IVʼs COINS: Achievements and Shortfalls, 2024, Link

    2024

  27. [27]

    125, 2006, Link

    Argandoña & Mirabel, ``New ALMA Site Museum Preserves Valuable Local Culture’’, ESO Messenger No. 125, 2006, Link

    2006

  28. [28]

    ESO announcement, ``The Atacama Elders' Vision of the Cosmos’’, 2013, Link

    2013

  29. [29]

    Young People From San Pedro De Atacama and New Mexico Share Indigenous Vision of the Cosmos

    ALMA announcement, “Young People From San Pedro De Atacama and New Mexico Share Indigenous Vision of the Cosmos”, 2019, Link

    2019

  30. [30]

    ALMA Observatory supports recovery of the Kunza language

    ALMA announcement, “ALMA Observatory supports recovery of the Kunza language”, 2011, Link

    2011