pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19400 · v1 · pith:KXODGSAPnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · nucl-ex

The Silicon Tracking System of the E16 experiment at J-PARC: construction, installation and commissioning in beam test experiments

Dairon Rodr\'iguez Garc\'es , Rento Yamada , Kazuya Aoki , Lady Maryann Collazo S\'anchez , Hideto En'yo , David Emschermann , J\"urgen Eschke , Ulrich Frankenfeld
show 28 more authors
David Guti\'errez Men\'endez Johann M. Heuser Masaya Ichikawa Ralf Kapell Irakli Keshelashvili J\"org Lehnert Tomoki Murakami Wataru Nakai Shunnosuke Nagafusa Satomi Nakasuga Megumi Naruki Frederike Nickels Shuta Ochiai Kyoichiro Ozawa Dar\'io Alberto Ram\'irez Zald\'ivar Adrian Rodr\'iguez Rodr\'iguez Kerstin Schuenemann Christian Joachim Schmidt Hans Rudolf Schmidt Mehulkumar Shiroya Carmen Simons Tomonori Takahashi Maksym Teklishyn Alberica Toia Oleg Vasylyev Robert Visinka Yorito Yamaguchi Wojciech Zabolotny
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det nucl-ex
keywords silicon trackingE16 experimentJ-PARCbeam testcommissioningdielectronCBM technology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fifteen silicon tracking modules built from CBM technology were installed in the E16 setup and operated with a 3 GeV electron beam during commissioning tests.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that modules constructed with the same technology and procedures as the CBM STS can be assembled, tested, characterized, installed, and run in beam tests for the J-PARC E16 experiment. This matters to a sympathetic reader because E16 needs reliable tracking to measure dielectron decays from vector mesons produced by a 30 GeV proton beam at rates up to 10 MHz in order to look for in-medium modifications that signal chiral symmetry restoration. The work shows fifteen modules were built and three were illuminated in two planes during the Tsukuba electron-beam run, with prior characterization and calibration confirming setup quality. The central object carrying the argument is the E16-STS module itself.

Core claim

Fifteen modules were assembled, tested, characterized and installed in the E16 detector; during the beam test three modules operated and were illuminated in two planes by the 3 GeV electron beam, demonstrating the construction and commissioning process for the upgraded tracking system.

What carries the argument

The silicon tracking modules, built with the same technology and procedures as the CBM STS modules, which supply the position-sensitive tracking required for dielectron measurements.

If this is right

  • The modules can be integrated into the full E16 detector for proton-beam running.
  • The characterization and calibration procedures are adequate to ensure module quality ahead of physics data collection.
  • Three modules operating in two planes under electron illumination validates the mechanical and electronic integration into the E16 setup.
  • The beam-test results provide a baseline for expected tracking performance in the dielectron channel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful operation at J-PARC would directly enable the first high-statistics in-medium vector-meson measurements with the E16 apparatus.
  • Re-use of CBM module designs may shorten development time for tracking systems in other fixed-target experiments that require high-rate capability.
  • Electron-beam calibration data could be used to tune simulation parameters before proton runs begin.

Load-bearing premise

The performance measured with a 3 GeV electron beam at Tsukuba is representative of the modules' behavior under the 30 GeV proton beam at J-PARC at instantaneous rates up to 10 MHz.

What would settle it

A measurement at J-PARC showing that hit efficiency, spatial resolution, or rate capability under 30 GeV protons at 10 MHz falls below the values recorded in the 3 GeV electron test would falsify the claim that the commissioned modules are ready for E16 data taking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19400 by Adrian Rodr\'iguez Rodr\'iguez, Alberica Toia, Carmen Simons, Christian Joachim Schmidt, Dairon Rodr\'iguez Garc\'es, Dar\'io Alberto Ram\'irez Zald\'ivar, David Emschermann, David Guti\'errez Men\'endez, Frederike Nickels, Hans Rudolf Schmidt, Hideto En'yo, Irakli Keshelashvili, Johann M. Heuser, J\"org Lehnert, J\"urgen Eschke, Kazuya Aoki, Kerstin Schuenemann, Kyoichiro Ozawa, Lady Maryann Collazo S\'anchez, Maksym Teklishyn, Masaya Ichikawa, Megumi Naruki, Mehulkumar Shiroya, Oleg Vasylyev, Ralf Kapell, Rento Yamada, Robert Visinka, Satomi Nakasuga, Shunnosuke Nagafusa, Shuta Ochiai, Tomoki Murakami, Tomonori Takahashi, Ulrich Frankenfeld, Wataru Nakai, Wojciech Zabolotny, Yorito Yamaguchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left top: bare E16-STS module and bottom: fully assembled E16-STS modules mounted onto ladders and fixed onto a bottom plate ready for long-distance transportation. Right: a side view of the E16-STS chamber, several ladders with their modules are visible. amplitude, time resolution, and position resolution; finally, Section 5 discusses the strategy to couple the STS free￾streaming system with the E16 trigg… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Current-voltage sensor measurement for the first ten E16-STS modules. The full depletion voltage at 60 V is shown with a vertical dashed line. 2.1.2. Characterization of the E16-STS front-end electronics The data link initialization and synchronization allow verifying the communication with all data links in each ASIC (two per in this case) on the module, ensuring proper connection and reliable operation. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Temperature and Right: potentials for each module measured with the built-in diagnostic circuit. Every point is the average among 16 SMX ASICs and error bars represent the minimum and maximum measured values. 2.1.3. Calibration of the ASICs analog front-end The calibration of the Analog Front End (AFE) circuits is performed to adjust individually the threshold of each channel’s discriminators (31 ADC… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: ADC gain and Right: threshold distribution for all channels across module. Mean and sigma values determined for each side through a Gaussian fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the distribution of the measured ENC for an exemplary module (E16-102-PA). The mean ENC agrees within 20% with the analytically calculated value based on the total module capacitance [17], taking into account the contribution of all individual module components. This level of agreement validates the capacitance model and indicates a good understanding of the detector noise characteristics [PITH_FULL… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Channel distribution of the module E16-102-PA resulted of the irradiation of the sensor with 90𝑆𝑟∕𝑌 . The broken channels identified through an ENC measurement are also displayed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: Time difference for strip-signals inside the cluster, demonstrating the channel synchronization; Right: XY hit reconstruction of a radioactive 90𝑆𝑟∕𝑌 source illuminating in the center of the module. The geometrical space distribution of the reconstructed hits (space-points) is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Experimental setup during November 2023 beam campaign at KEK, using an electron beam of 3 GeV/c momentum. The setup includes the E16-STS chamber with a combination of alignment and trigger scintillators used to define an active area of 10 × 10 mm2 . set to 1.4 fC for the amplitude measuring path and 3.0 fC for the timing measuring path, although the latter was later found to be too higher, leading to a fra… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic readout of the J-PARC E16-STS. The raw signal is sent from the sensor to GERI board through the FCC-Ethernet adapter, LVDS repeater and GBTx-EMU board. A functional block diagram of the readout chain of the STS system used for the test beam is schematically depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Two different testing configurations. Module E16-108-PA positioned at an incident angle of: a) 0 ◦ and b) 16◦ . c) The three modules at different angles of incidence. 4. Results 4.1. Data Analysis The strategy followed for data analysis is to use the reconstruction chain developed for the CBM-STS detector, therefore interfacing the data at the earliest possible stage (raw data) to the CBMROOT format [23],… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of signal amplitude for the n- and p- side of a module with inclination angle of 0◦ , 16◦ and 39◦ . The data distributions are fitted with a convolution of a Landau function with a Gaussian. measured values are up to 7% below the expected charge deposited by minimum ionizing particles (MIPs) in 320 µm of silicon, which can be explained with signal losses due to high thresholds and the distrib… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Signal amplitude correlation between n- and p-side for clusters of size 1. Data measured for the different testing configurations of incidence angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top: Time difference of raw strip signals of the STS and signal from the scintillators as a function of the STS signal amplitude for 0 ◦ (left), 16◦ (middle) and 39◦ (right) inclination angle. Bottom: Time resolution of the STS, as a function of the STS signal amplitude for the same inclination angles. detector can be extracted from the width of the distribution, since the contribution from the scintillat… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Residual distributions in the 𝑋 (left) and 𝑌 (right) directions for tracks extrapolated to the middle sensor (DUT) at an inclination angle of 62◦ . The distribution is fitted with the sum of a Gaussian and a polynomial, to account for the background. The intrinsic spatial resolution of the STS is extracted from the width of the residual distributions. The residuals are fitted with the sum of a Gaussian fu… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Schematic illustration of time axes and event timing in the STS readout system. Implementing this online selection requires precise time synchronization among the STS readout components. Synchronization is typically classified into three levels: frequency synchronization, ensuring that the clock frequencies match; phase synchronization, aligning clock edges; and time synchronization, which aligns timestam… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The J-PARC E16 experiment aims to search for signatures of chiral symmetry restoration. It studies in-medium modifications of vector mesons that decay via the dielectron channel. The measurements use a high-intensity 30 GeV proton beam with C and Cu targets at rates up to 10 MHz. To achieve this, the experiment upgrades its tracking, by introducing innermost detector modules constructed with the same technology and procedures as the modules of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) of the Compressed Baryonic Matter (CBM) experiment at Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR). A total of 15 modules were assembled, tested, characterized and then installed in the E16 detector setup. The detector was commissioned in a beam test experiment at Tsukuba, where the detector modules could be exposed to a 3 GeV electron beam. In preparation for the beam test the modules were characterized and calibrated, and performance studies were accomplished to assess the quality of the setup. During beamtime, three modules were operated and illuminated in two planes by the electron beam. This paper presents the results of the construction, characterization, commissioning, and operation of the E16-STS modules in beam test experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the construction, testing, characterization, and installation of 15 silicon tracking modules for the E16 experiment at J-PARC, which adapt the technology from the CBM STS. It reports commissioning of the detector in a beam test at Tsukuba using a 3 GeV electron beam, during which three modules were operated in two planes, and presents the results of these activities.

Significance. If the reported assembly and beam-test operation hold, the work provides a practical demonstration that CBM-derived STS modules can be integrated and operated in the E16 setup, supporting the experiment's high-rate dielectron measurements at J-PARC. This is a useful technical milestone for adapting existing detector technology to a new facility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The text states that 'performance studies were accomplished to assess the quality of the setup' and that the paper 'presents the results of the construction, characterization, commissioning, and operation', but the manuscript supplies no quantitative metrics (hit efficiency, spatial resolution, noise, or calibration constants) from either the pre-beam characterization or the Tsukuba beam test. This prevents evaluation of whether the commissioning was successful.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Introduction: When stating that the modules use 'the same technology and procedures as the modules of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) of the CBM experiment', a specific reference to the relevant CBM STS construction or module papers should be added.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the positive overall assessment. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The text states that 'performance studies were accomplished to assess the quality of the setup' and that the paper 'presents the results of the construction, characterization, commissioning, and operation', but the manuscript supplies no quantitative metrics (hit efficiency, spatial resolution, noise, or calibration constants) from either the pre-beam characterization or the Tsukuba beam test. This prevents evaluation of whether the commissioning was successful.

    Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript does not supply the quantitative metrics listed by the referee. Although the abstract refers to performance studies and results of characterization and commissioning, the body of the paper focuses on the assembly process, module integration, and the setup of the beam-test configuration without presenting numerical values for hit efficiency, spatial resolution, noise, or calibration constants. We will add a new section (or expand the existing commissioning section) that reports these metrics from both the laboratory characterization and the 3 GeV electron beam test, thereby allowing the reader to evaluate the quality of the commissioning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: factual construction and commissioning report

full rationale

The paper is a descriptive technical report on module assembly (15 modules), testing, installation, and beam-test operation (3 modules in two planes with 3 GeV electrons). No derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citation load-bearing claims are present. All content consists of procedural descriptions and factual counts with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. The representativeness assumption noted in the abstract does not affect the reported construction steps, which are independently verifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an experimental report of detector construction and operation. No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are required or introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5962 in / 1141 out tokens · 39807 ms · 2026-06-26T19:02:43.586559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    AddendumtotheJ-PARCE16TechnicalDesignReportforRun-1approval

    S.Yokkaichiandetal. AddendumtotheJ-PARCE16TechnicalDesignReportforRun-1approval. TechnicalReport,J-PARC,Run-1Approval Document., 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Aoki et al

    K. Aoki et al. Experimental investigation of vector mesons in medium through dielectron decay at J-PARC.Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology, 3:100019, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Nakasuga et al

    S. Nakasuga et al. First Measurement of𝜙-Meson Production in 30-GeV Proton–Nucleus Reactions via Di-electron Decay at J-PARC.Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2026:043D03, 2026. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptag042

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptag042 2026

  4. [4]

    Murakami et al

    T.N. Murakami et al. Construction of gas electron multiplier tracker for the J-PARC E16 experiment.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 1058:168817, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2023.168817

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168817 2024

  5. [5]

    Nakasuga et al

    S. Nakasuga et al. Establishment of the electron identification system for vector meson measurement at J-PARC.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1082:170956, 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2025.170956

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170956 2026

  6. [6]

    Naruki et al

    M. Naruki et al. Experimental signature of medium modifications for𝜌 and 𝜔 mesons in the 12-GeV p + a reactions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96: 092301, 2006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.092301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.092301 2006

  7. [7]

    Muto et al

    R. Muto et al. Evidence for in-medium modification of the𝜙 meson at normal nuclear density.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:042501, 2007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.042501 2007

  8. [8]

    Johann Heuser, Walter Müller, V. Pugatch, Peter Senger, Christian Joachim Schmidt, Christian Sturm, and Ulrich Frankenfeld, editors.[GSI Report 2013-4] Technical Design Report for the CBM Silicon Tracking System (STS). GSI, Darmstadt, 2013. URLhttps://repository. gsi.de/record/54798. https://repository.gsi.de/record/54798. First Author et al.:Preprint sub...

    2013

  9. [9]

    Rodríguez Rodríguez

    A. Rodríguez Rodríguez. Advancements in the Silicon Tracking System of the CBM experiment: module series production, testing, and operational insights.JINST, 20(03):C03020, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/20/03/C03020

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/20/03/c03020 2025

  10. [10]

    M.Teklishyn,L.M.CollazoSánchez,U.Frankenfeld,J.M.Heuser,O.Kshyvanskyi,J.Lehnert,D.A.RamírezZaldivar,D.RodríguezGarcés, A.RodríguezRodríguez,C.J.Schmidt,P.Semeniuk,M.Shiroya,A.Sharma,A.Toia,andO.Vasylyev. Minimalmaterial,maximumcoverage: Silicon Tracking System for high-occupancy conditions.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170714 2025

  11. [11]

    Ablyazimov et al

    T. Ablyazimov et al. Challenges in QCD matter physics - the scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR. The European Physical Journal A, 53:60, 2017. ISSN 1434-601X. doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/i2017-12248-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y 2017

  12. [12]

    Performance of the prototype Silicon Tracking System of the CBM experiment tested with heavy-ion beams at SIS18

    The CBM Collaboration. Performance of the prototype Silicon Tracking System of the CBM experiment tested with heavy-ion beams at SIS18. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment,

  13. [13]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20517

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    https://www.hamamatsu.com/

    Hamamatsu Photonics. https://www.hamamatsu.com/

  15. [15]

    Characterization oftheSTS/MUCH-XYTER2,a128-channeltimeandamplitudemeasurementICforgasandsiliconmicrostripsensors

    K.Kasinski,A.Rodriguez-Rodriguez,J.Lehnert,W.Zubrzycka,R.Szczygiel,P.Otfinowski,R.Kleczek,andC.J.Schmidt. Characterization oftheSTS/MUCH-XYTER2,a128-channeltimeandamplitudemeasurementICforgasandsiliconmicrostripsensors. NuclearInstruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 908:225–23...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.08.076 2018

  16. [16]

    Keshelashvili, C

    I. Keshelashvili, C. Simons, O. Bertini, K. Schuenemann, O. Suddia, R. Visinka, C.J. Schmidt, H. Herzenstiel, B. Leyrer, and T. Blank. The description of the steps of the Q&A test and detector module assembly of the CBM-STS.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1071:...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2024.170081 2025

  17. [17]

    V. M. Borshchov, Yu. A. Murin, C. J. Schmidt, M. A. Protsenko, I. T. Tymchuk, J. M. Heuser, R. A. Kushniruk, M. S. Tykhomirova, K. M. Liholitova, and L. V. Klimova. Pre-series production of microcables for STS detector modules at LTU Ltd.GSI Scientific Report 2015, page 36, 2016. doi: 10.15120/GR-2016-1

    work page doi:10.15120/gr-2016-1 2015

  18. [18]

    Rodríguez-Rodríguez, O

    A. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, O. Maragoto-Rodríguez, J. Lehnert, A. Toia, M. Teklishyn, A. Lymanets, D. Rodríguez-Garcés, J. M. Heuser, and C. J. Schmidt. Functional characterization of modules for the Silicon Tracking System of the CBM experiment.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associate...

    2024

  19. [19]

    URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900223008045

    doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2023.168813. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900223008045

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168813 2023

  20. [20]

    https://www.wiener-d.com/product/mpod-lv-module/

    WIENER. https://www.wiener-d.com/product/mpod-lv-module/

  21. [21]

    https://iseg-hv.com/en/products/detail/EHS

    ISEG HV. https://iseg-hv.com/en/products/detail/EHS

  22. [22]

    https://www.lauda.de/us/

    LAUDA. https://www.lauda.de/us/

  23. [23]

    Dementev, M

    D. Dementev, M. Guminski, I. Kovalev, M. Kruszewski, I. Kudryashov, A. Kurganov, P. Miedzik, Yu. Murin, K. Pozniak, C. J. Schmidt, M. Shitenkow, A. G. Voronin, and W. M. Zabolotny. Fast data-driven readout system for the wide aperture Silicon Tracking System of the BM@N experiment.Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 52(4):830–834, 2021. doi: 10.1134/S1063779...

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779621040213 2021

  24. [24]

    Yamato Scientific Co., Ltd. CF303. https://www.yamato-scientific.com/product/category/science/water-circulator/ closed-coolingcirculator/2563/

  25. [25]

    Al-Turany, D

    M. Al-Turany, D. Bertini, and I. Koenig. Cbmroot: Simulation and analysis framework for the CBM experiment. InProceedings of CHEP 2006, 2006. URLhttps://indico.cern.ch/event/408139/contributions/979676/attachments/815543/1117470/cbmroot_ CHEP06.pdf

    2006

  26. [26]

    A cluster-finding algorithm for free-streaming data.EPJ Web of Conferences, 214:1008, 9 2019

    Volker Friese. A cluster-finding algorithm for free-streaming data.EPJ Web of Conferences, 214:1008, 9 2019. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/ 201921401008

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/ 2019

  27. [27]

    A precision device needs precise simulation: Software description of the CBM Silicon Tracking System

    Hanna Malygina and Volker Friese. A precision device needs precise simulation: Software description of the CBM Silicon Tracking System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 898:042022, 10 2017. ISSN 1742-6588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/898/4/042022. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/898/4/042022. First Author et al.:P...

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/4/042022 2017