pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20759 · v1 · pith:L64NFOE2new · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌀 gr-qc

Study of Cosmic Acceleration of the Universe in the Presence of Bulk Viscous Matter

Dheeraj Singh Rana This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords f(Q) gravitybulk viscositycosmic accelerationlate-time expansioncosmological solutionsobservational constraintsdynamical systemsmodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

f(Q) gravity models incorporating bulk viscous matter reproduce the observed late-time acceleration of the universe after fitting to data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines f(Q) gravity, an alternative to general relativity based on non-metricity, by adding a bulk viscous fluid component to the cosmic matter content. It derives exact cosmological solutions in this setup and uses observational datasets to constrain the free parameters. The constrained models are then shown to describe the transition from earlier epochs to the current accelerated expansion phase. Additional nonlinear variants of the viscous f(Q) models are tested for viability using dynamical systems methods and further observational checks.

Core claim

In f(Q) gravity sourced by bulk viscous matter, exact solutions exist whose parameters can be fixed by current cosmological data such that the models produce the observed shift to accelerated expansion at late times; nonlinear extensions similarly pass tests for reproducing the full sequence of cosmic epochs.

What carries the argument

The modified Friedmann equations arising from the f(Q) action with an effective pressure modified by a bulk viscosity term that depends on the expansion rate.

If this is right

  • The models fit current datasets and reproduce the observed expansion history without separate dark energy.
  • Nonlinear viscous f(Q) models remain viable through dynamical systems analysis and match multiple evolutionary phases.
  • The approach yields constrained parameter sets usable for further study of cosmic evolution.
  • Both linear and nonlinear cases demonstrate consistency with the transition from matter domination to acceleration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar viscosity terms could be added to other modified gravity theories to test whether they also fit acceleration data.
  • Future high-precision surveys could tighten the allowed ranges for the viscosity coefficient and f(Q) parameters.
  • The framework offers a route to examine whether effective viscous effects can replace explicit dark energy components in broader classes of gravity models.

Load-bearing premise

Bulk viscosity provides a physically appropriate description of cosmic matter across all epochs and the chosen functional forms for f(Q) and the viscosity coefficient remain valid when matched to observations.

What would settle it

Future measurements of the Hubble parameter or deceleration parameter at intermediate redshifts that deviate from the values predicted by the observationally constrained viscous f(Q) solutions.

read the original abstract

Over the past century, both theoretical advancements and experimental observations have established General Relativity (GR) as the most successful framework for describing gravitational phenomena. However, observations from multiple cosmological probes over the last two decades have provided compelling evidence for the accelerated expansion of the Universe. The rapid progress in observational astronomy and precision cosmology has highlighted several challenges that motivate the search for extensions or alternatives to General Relativity. In this thesis, we investigate alternative formulations of gravity based on non-Riemannian geometry, with particular emphasis on (f(Q)) gravity in the presence of bulk viscosity. We first explore the existence of exact cosmological solutions for viscous fluid models within the framework of (f(Q)) gravity and constrain the free parameters of these solutions using observational datasets. The resulting constrained models are then employed to study the evolutionary history of cosmic expansion. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed viscous (f(Q)) gravity models can successfully account for the observed late-time acceleration of the Universe. Furthermore, we examine several classes of nonlinear viscous (f(Q)) gravity models through both dynamical systems and observational analyses. Particular attention is given to the cosmological viability of these models and their ability to reproduce the different evolutionary epochs of the Universe, ranging from matter-dominated eras to accelerated expansion phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates f(Q) gravity coupled to bulk viscous matter. It constructs exact cosmological solutions for chosen f(Q) forms and viscosity parametrizations, constrains the free parameters against observational datasets, applies dynamical-systems methods to nonlinear models, and concludes that the resulting models reproduce the observed late-time acceleration while also passing through matter-dominated epochs.

Significance. If the physical appropriateness of the bulk-viscosity term across cosmic history can be independently verified, the work would supply a concrete alternative to dark-energy models within symmetric teleparallel gravity, with the combination of exact solutions and phase-space analysis providing a stronger analytical foundation than purely numerical approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the models 'can successfully account for the observed late-time acceleration' rests on fitting the free parameters of f(Q) and the viscosity coefficient directly to the same datasets that already indicate acceleration; the success is therefore by construction rather than an independent prediction. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Observational constraints and dynamical analysis sections] Observational constraints and dynamical analysis sections: no explicit verification is given that the best-fit viscosity coefficients remain consistent with the matter-dominated era or yield stable linear perturbations, which is required to support the claim that the models reproduce the full evolutionary history from matter domination to acceleration.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definitions] Ensure that the functional forms chosen for f(Q) and the viscosity term are stated explicitly with all free parameters listed before the fitting procedure begins.
  2. [Dynamical systems figures] Phase portraits should label the fixed points corresponding to de Sitter and matter-dominated epochs for immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and detailed review. We address each major point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate. The manuscript demonstrates consistency of viscous f(Q) models with data and evolutionary history via dynamical systems, but we acknowledge the need for clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the models 'can successfully account for the observed late-time acceleration' rests on fitting the free parameters of f(Q) and the viscosity coefficient directly to the same datasets that already indicate acceleration; the success is therefore by construction rather than an independent prediction. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim relies on parameter fitting to observational datasets that already encode acceleration. The manuscript's contribution is to show that f(Q) gravity with bulk viscosity provides a consistent alternative framework whose parameters can be constrained to match the data while satisfying the field equations and reproducing acceleration. The dynamical-systems analysis supplies an independent check on the background evolution. To address the concern about phrasing, we will revise the abstract to state that the models are consistent with the observed acceleration after observational constraints on the parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Observational constraints and dynamical analysis sections] Observational constraints and dynamical analysis sections: no explicit verification is given that the best-fit viscosity coefficients remain consistent with the matter-dominated era or yield stable linear perturbations, which is required to support the claim that the models reproduce the full evolutionary history from matter domination to acceleration.

    Authors: The dynamical-systems analysis already identifies matter-dominated fixed points and demonstrates that trajectories can pass through them for the nonlinear models considered. In revision we will add an explicit subsection confirming that the observationally best-fit viscosity coefficients permit passage through the matter-dominated epoch before acceleration. However, the manuscript does not contain a linear perturbation analysis, so explicit verification of stability under perturbations cannot be provided without new calculations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Explicit verification that the best-fit models yield stable linear perturbations

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Acceleration claim reduces to fit of free parameters to the same observational datasets

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "we first explore the existence of exact cosmological solutions for viscous fluid models within the framework of (f(Q)) gravity and constrain the free parameters of these solutions using observational datasets. The resulting constrained models are then employed to study the evolutionary history of cosmic expansion. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed viscous (f(Q)) gravity models can successfully account for the observed late-time acceleration of the Universe."

    Parameters are fitted to the datasets that encode the observed acceleration; the subsequent claim that the models 'successfully account for' that acceleration is therefore a restatement of the fit rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper derives exact solutions in viscous f(Q) gravity, constrains their free parameters directly against cosmological datasets, and then uses the constrained models to 'demonstrate' that they account for late-time acceleration. This matches the fitted_input_called_prediction pattern: the success metric is the reproduction of the input data by construction. No independent, parameter-free derivation or external benchmark is indicated in the provided text. The central claim therefore reduces to the fitting step rather than emerging from first principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the f(Q) action, the bulk-viscosity ansatz, and the assumption that observational datasets can be used to fix model parameters without introducing circularity. No machine-checked proofs or independent falsifiable predictions are described.

free parameters (2)
  • f(Q) model parameters
    Constrained using observational datasets as stated in the abstract
  • viscosity coefficients
    Fitted to data to obtain exact solutions
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption f(Q) gravity is a valid extension of general relativity
    Paper builds all solutions inside this framework
  • domain assumption Bulk viscosity provides a physically motivated description of cosmic fluid
    Used to drive acceleration without dark energy

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5744 in / 1114 out tokens · 32082 ms · 2026-06-26T16:49:33.630995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to GR

    S. Carroll, “Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to GR” (Addison Wesley, Boston) (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Einstein,Ann

    A. Einstein,Ann. Phys.354, 769(1916)

    1916

  3. [3]

    H. P . Robertson,Astrophys. J.82, 284 (1935)

    1935

  4. [4]

    A. G. Walker,Proc. Lon. Math. Soc.42, 90127 (1937)

    1937

  5. [5]

    Einstein,Sitzber

    A. Einstein,Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.142, 87 (1917)

    1917

  6. [6]

    Einstein,Sitzber

    A. Einstein,Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.235, 37 (1931)

    1931

  7. [7]

    Y. B. Zel ´dovich,JETP Lett.6, 316 (1967)

    1967

  8. [8]

    Weinberg,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2607 (1987)

    1987

  9. [9]

    Aghanim, et al.,Astron

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, et al.,Astron. Astrophys.641, 67 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Abdalla et al.,J

    E. Abdalla et al.,J. High En. Astrophys.2204, 002 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CAN- TATA Network

    CANTATA collaboration, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CAN- TATA Network” (Springer) (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    D. M. Scolnic et al.,Astrophys. J.938, 113 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    J. B. Jim ´enez, L. Heisenberg, and T. S. Koivisto,Universe5, 173 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Gravity and Strings

    T. Ortin, “Gravity and Strings” (Cambridge University Press) (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    Iosifidis,Class

    D. Iosifidis,Class. Quant. Grav.36, 085001 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Einstein,Sitzber

    A. Einstein,Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.17, 217-221 (1928)

    1928

  17. [17]

    Invarianten Theorie

    R. Weitzenb ¨ock, “Invarianten Theorie” (Nordhoff, Groningen) (1923)

    1923

  18. [18]

    J. W. Maluf,Ann. Phys.525, 339 (2013)

    2013

  19. [19]

    H. A. Buchdahl,Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc.150, 1 (1970). 92 References 93

    1970

  20. [20]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Phys. Lett. B91, 99 ( 1980)

    1980

  21. [21]

    Ferraro, F

    R. Ferraro, F. Fiorini,Phys. Rev. D75, 084031 (2007)

    2007

  22. [22]

    Tamanini, C

    N. Tamanini, C. G. Boehmer,Phys. Rev. D86, 044009 (2012)

    2012

  23. [23]

    Krssak, E

    M. Krssak, E. N. Saridakis,Class. Quant. Grav.33, 115009 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Y. F. Cai et al.,Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 106901 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    T. P . Sotiriou, B. Li, J. D. Barrow,Phys. Rev. D83, 104030 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    B. Li, T. P . Sotiriou, J. D. Barrow,Phys. Rev. D83, 064035 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Paliathanasis, J

    A. Paliathanasis, J. D. Barrow, P .G.L. Leach,Phys. Rev. D94, 023525 (2016)

    2016

  28. [28]

    F. W. Hehl et al.,Phys. Rep.258, 1 (1995)

    1995

  29. [29]

    J. B. Jim ´enez et al.,Phys. Rev. D101, 103507 (2020)

    2020

  30. [31]

    J. B. Jim ´enez, L. Heisenberg, T. Koivisto,Phys. Rev. D98, 044048 (2018)

    2018

  31. [32]

    Brevik,Entropy14, 2302 (2012)

    I. Brevik,Entropy14, 2302 (2012)

    2012

  32. [33]

    Brevik, O

    I. Brevik, O. Gron,Astrophys. Space Sci.347, 399 (2013)

    2013

  33. [34]

    Brevik et al.,Int

    I. Brevik et al.,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730024 (2017)

    2017

  34. [35]

    Brevik, A

    I. Brevik, A. N. Makarenko, A. V . Timoshkin,Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod.16, 1950150 (2019)

    2019

  35. [36]

    Brevik, B

    I. Brevik, B. D. Normann,Symmetry12, 1085 (2020)

    2020

  36. [37]

    N. D. J. Mohan, A. Sasidharan, T. K. Mathew,Eur. Phys. J. C77, 849 (2017)

    2017

  37. [38]

    A. V . Astashenok, S. D. Odintsov, A. S. Tepliakov,Nucl. Phys. B974, 115646 (2022)

    2022

  38. [39]

    Sasidharan, T

    A. Sasidharan, T. K. Mathew,Eur. Phys. J. C75, 348 (2015)

    2015

  39. [40]

    Eckart,Phys

    C. Eckart,Phys. Rev.58, 919 (1940)

    1940

  40. [41]

    Israel, J

    W. Israel, J. M. Stewart,Phys. Lett. B58, 213 (1976)

    1976

  41. [42]

    Israel,Ann

    W. Israel,Ann. Phys.(N.Y.)100, 310 (1976)

    1976

  42. [43]

    Israel, J

    W. Israel, J. M. Stewart,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B365, 43 (1979)

    1979

  43. [44]

    Dark Energy

    M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang, Y. Wang, “Dark Energy” (Peking University Press-World Scientific Advanced Physics Series(2014). References 94

    2014

  44. [45]

    Practical Mathematical Optimization: An Introduction to Basic optimiza- tion Theory and Classic and New Gradient Based Algorithms

    J. A. Snyman, “Practical Mathematical Optimization: An Introduction to Basic optimiza- tion Theory and Classic and New Gradient Based Algorithms” (Springer) (2005)

    2005

  45. [46]

    Pearson,Nature72, 294 (1905)

    K. Pearson,Nature72, 294 (1905)

    1905

  46. [47]

    Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms

    D. MacKay, “Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms” (Cambridge Uni- versity Press) (2003)

    2003

  47. [48]

    D. F. Mackey et al.,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013)

    2013

  48. [49]

    Bahamonde et al.,Phys

    S. Bahamonde et al.,Phys. Reports775, 1 (2018)

    2018

  49. [50]

    Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering,

    S. Strogatz., “Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering,”CRC Press(2018)

    2018

  50. [51]

    Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos,

    S. Wiggins., “Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos,” vol. 2, Springer Science&Business Media,(2003)

    2003

  51. [52]

    Xu et al.,Eur

    Y. Xu et al.,Eur. Phys. J. C79, 708 (2019)

    2019

  52. [53]

    Xu et al.,Eur

    Y. Xu et al.,Eur. Phys. J. C80, 449 (2020)

    2020

  53. [54]

    Hazarika et al.,Phys

    A. Hazarika et al.,Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102092 (2025)

    2025

  54. [55]

    Sokoliuk, A

    O. Sokoliuk, A. Baransky,Astron. Nachr.343, 220003 (2022)

    2022

  55. [56]

    Dixit, D

    A. Dixit, D. C. Maurya, A. Pradhan,Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.19, 12 (2022)

    2022

  56. [57]

    M. M. Gohain, K. Bhuyan,Phys. Dark Univ.43, 101424 (2024)

    2024

  57. [58]

    Koussour et al.,Chin

    M. Koussour et al.,Chin. J. Phys.90, 97 (2024)

    2024

  58. [59]

    Koussour et al.,Phys

    M. Koussour et al.,Phys. Dark Univ.45, 101527 (2024)

    2024

  59. [60]

    Koussour et al.,Mod

    M. Koussour et al.,Mod. Phys. Lett. A39, 2450023 (2024)

    2024

  60. [61]

    Hohmann,Phys

    M. Hohmann,Phys. Rev. D104, 124077 (2021)

    2021

  61. [62]

    D’Ambrosio, L

    F. D’Ambrosio, L. Heisenberg, S. Kuhn,Class. Quantum Grav.39, 025013 (2022)

    2022

  62. [63]

    Gomez, G

    L. Gomez, G. Palma, A. Rincon, N. Cruz, E. Gonzalez,Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 738 (2023)

    2023

  63. [64]

    A Pai, T

    V . A Pai, T. K. Mathew,Class. Quantum Grav.41, 31 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    Lazkoz et al.,Phys

    R. Lazkoz et al.,Phys. Rev. D100, 104027 (2019)

    2019

  65. [66]

    Solanki et al.,Universe9(1), 12 (2023)

    R. Solanki et al.,Universe9(1), 12 (2023)

    2023

  66. [67]

    D. F. Mackey et al.,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306(2013)

    2013

  67. [68]

    Solanki et al.,Phys

    R. Solanki et al.,Phys. Dark Univ.32, 100820 (2021). References 95

    2021

  68. [69]

    CANTATA collaboration, Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CANTATA Network, 2105.12582

    work page arXiv

  69. [70]

    Timothy Clifton et al.,Physics Reports513, 1 (2012)

    2012

  70. [71]

    D. A. Gomes et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 141401 (2024)

    2024

  71. [72]

    Heisenberg, M

    L. Heisenberg, M. Hohmann, and S. Kuhn, arXiv:2311.05495[gr-qc] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [73]

    Hohmann et al,Phys

    M. Hohmann et al,Phys. Rev. D99, 024009 (2019)

    2019

  73. [74]

    Jim ´enez, L

    J.B. Jim ´enez, L. Heisenberg, T. S. Koivisto,JCAP1808, 039 (2018)

    2018

  74. [75]

    Anagnostopoulos, S

    F.K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos, E. N. Saridakis,Phys. Lett. B,822(2021)

    2021

  75. [76]

    Atayde, N

    L. Atayde, N. Frusciante,Phys. Rev. D104, 6 (2021)

    2021

  76. [77]

    Capozziello, V

    S. Capozziello, V . De Falco, C. Ferrara,Eur. Phys. J. C82, 865 (2022)

    2022

  77. [78]

    B. J. Theng, T. H. Loo, A. De,Chin. J. Phys.77, 1551 (2022)

    2022

  78. [79]

    A. De, L.T. How,Phys. Rev. D,106, 048501 (2022)

    2022

  79. [80]

    A. De, T. H. Loo,Class. Quantum Grav.40, 115007 (2023)

    2023

  80. [81]

    Frusciante,Phys

    N. Frusciante,Phys. Rev. D103, 0444021 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.