pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21469 · v1 · pith:ONS5LPZOnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Hyperfine versus exchange interaction in the spin dynamics of spatially indirect excitons in CsPbI₃ perovskite nanocrystals

Timur S. Shamirzaev , Nataliia E. Kopteva , Dmitry S. Smirnov , Dmitri R. Yakovlev , Elena V. Kolobkova , Maria S. Kuznetsova , Eugeniyus L. Ivchenko , Yan E. Maidebura
show 2 more authors
Evgeny A. Zhukov Manfred Bayer
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords excitonshyperfine interactionexchange interactionperovskitenanocrystalsspin dynamicsoptical orientationCsPbI3
0
0 comments X

The pith

For the smallest exchange splittings, hyperfine interaction with nuclear spins dominates the fine structure of indirect excitons in CsPbI3 nanocrystals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the recombination and spin dynamics of excitons in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals in a glass matrix. In nanocrystals larger than 16 nm, the low-energy emission comes from indirect excitons with electrons and holes localized separately at the nanocrystal-glass interface. The recombination times follow a power-law distribution from tens of nanoseconds to microseconds. Optical pumping experiments show alignment and orientation effects that vary with the strength of the electron-hole exchange interaction. A model of triplet exciton polarized emission demonstrates that hyperfine coupling to nuclear spin fluctuations overtakes the exchange interaction in setting the fine structure for the weakest exchange cases.

Core claim

We develop a theory of the polarized photoluminescence of triplet excitons, taking into account the interplay between the electron-hole exchange interaction, their Zeeman effect, and their hyperfine interaction with the nuclei. This model reveals that for the excitons with the smallest exchange splitting we reach the regime, where the exciton fine structure becomes dominated by the hyperfine interaction with the random nuclear spin fluctuations in the NCs.

What carries the argument

The theoretical model for polarized photoluminescence of triplet excitons incorporating electron-hole exchange, Zeeman effect, and hyperfine interaction with nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy photoluminescence arises from emission by indirect excitons with electrons and holes spatially separated at the nanocrystal-glass interface.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the spin dynamics and polarized photoluminescence remain governed by exchange interaction even for the smallest observed exchange splittings would contradict the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21469 by Dmitri R. Yakovlev, Dmitry S. Smirnov, Elena V. Kolobkova, Eugeniyus L. Ivchenko, Evgeny A. Zhukov, Manfred Bayer, Maria S. Kuznetsova, Nataliia E. Kopteva, Timur S. Shamirzaev, Yan E. Maidebura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Optical absorption (blue line) and cw photoluminescence (orange line) spectra of CsPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spectral dependence of (a) optical alignment (blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectral dependences of optical orientation (a) and optical alignment (b), measured for cw emission in different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Optical orientation and optical alignment for cw [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamics of optical alignment (a) and optical orientation (b) measured at the energy of 1.675 eV in different magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a), so the optical alignment is significant in zero magnetic field, while the optical orientation is negligible. Accordingly, at short time delays, a large magnetic field of the order of one Tesla is needed to suppress the optical alignment and stabilize the optical orientation similarly to the direct excitons above the band edge. By contrast, the PL at long time delays is governed by the SIE with long li… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the dynamics of recombination, optical orientation, and optical alignment of excitons in ensembles of CsPbI$_{3}$ nanocrystals (NCs), synthesized in a glass matrix. In large NCs with size exceeding 16 nm, the low-energy photoluminescence is contributed by the emission of indirect in real space excitons formed by spatially separated electrons and holes, which are localized at the NC/glass interface. The recombination dynamics of an ensemble of such excitons extends from tens of nanoseconds to microseconds and exhibits a power-law dependence. Their optical alignment and optical orientation reveal a peculiar spin dynamics caused by excitons influenced by the exchange interaction, varying by orders of magnitude. We develop a theory of the polarized photoluminescence of triplet excitons, taking into account the interplay between the electron-hole exchange interaction, their Zeeman effect, and their hyperfine interaction with the nuclei. This model reveals that for the excitons with the smallest exchange splitting we reach the regime, where the exciton fine structure becomes dominated by the hyperfine interaction with the random nuclear spin fluctuations in the NCs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines recombination dynamics, optical orientation, and optical alignment of excitons in CsPbI₃ nanocrystals in a glass matrix. It attributes low-energy photoluminescence in NCs larger than 16 nm to emission from spatially indirect (real-space) triplet excitons formed by electrons and holes localized at the NC/glass interface, which exhibit power-law recombination over tens of ns to μs. A theory is developed for the polarized photoluminescence accounting for the interplay of electron-hole exchange interaction (varying over orders of magnitude), Zeeman effect, and hyperfine coupling to nuclear spins; the model concludes that the exciton fine structure enters a hyperfine-dominated regime for those excitons possessing the smallest exchange splittings.

Significance. If the identification of the emitting states holds, the work supplies a concrete theoretical framework linking the distribution of exchange splittings to the crossover into nuclear-fluctuation-dominated spin dynamics. This could explain the observed power-law kinetics and spin relaxation in these systems and offers testable predictions for how optical alignment/orientation depend on magnetic field and NC size.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and theory section] Abstract and theory section: The central claim that hyperfine interaction dominates the fine structure for the smallest-exchange excitons is load-bearing on the premise that the low-energy PL arises exclusively from spatially indirect excitons whose exchange splitting falls below the nuclear fluctuation scale. No quantitative estimate of the exchange distribution or direct experimental signature (e.g., size-dependent localization or interface-specific Stark shift) is supplied to establish that the observed states actually occupy this regime rather than direct excitons or states with larger exchange.
  2. [Theory and comparison with experiment] Spin-dynamics modeling: The theory incorporates standard exchange, Zeeman, and hyperfine terms, yet the manuscript does not show explicit numerical solutions or analytic limits (e.g., the condition δ_ex ≪ A_hf) compared against the measured polarization decay curves; without such comparison it remains unclear whether the hyperfine-dominated regime is required to fit the data or whether other parameter choices suffice.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Theory section] Define the ensemble distribution of exchange splittings explicitly and state the numerical range assumed for hyperfine coupling constants in the NCs.
  2. [Recombination dynamics] Clarify whether the power-law recombination is derived from the model or introduced phenomenologically.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional material where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and theory section] Abstract and theory section: The central claim that hyperfine interaction dominates the fine structure for the smallest-exchange excitons is load-bearing on the premise that the low-energy PL arises exclusively from spatially indirect excitons whose exchange splitting falls below the nuclear fluctuation scale. No quantitative estimate of the exchange distribution or direct experimental signature (e.g., size-dependent localization or interface-specific Stark shift) is supplied to establish that the observed states actually occupy this regime rather than direct excitons or states with larger exchange.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative estimate of the exchange splitting distribution would strengthen the identification of the hyperfine-dominated regime. In the revised manuscript we will add such an estimate based on the observed NC size threshold (>16 nm) and the expected variation in interface localization. The power-law recombination extending to microseconds and the abrupt appearance of the low-energy PL band for larger NCs already provide experimental support for the indirect-exciton assignment; we will expand the discussion to include possible interface-specific Stark shifts as additional signatures. The theory section already derives the analytic condition δ_ex ≪ A_hf under which hyperfine fluctuations dominate the fine structure, and the ensemble character of the PL naturally implies a broad distribution that includes the small-δ_ex tail. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theory and comparison with experiment] Spin-dynamics modeling: The theory incorporates standard exchange, Zeeman, and hyperfine terms, yet the manuscript does not show explicit numerical solutions or analytic limits (e.g., the condition δ_ex ≪ A_hf) compared against the measured polarization decay curves; without such comparison it remains unclear whether the hyperfine-dominated regime is required to fit the data or whether other parameter choices suffice.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct numerical solutions of the spin-dynamics model and explicit comparisons to the measured polarization decay curves would make the necessity of the hyperfine regime clearer. In the revision we will add figures presenting both analytic limits (including δ_ex ≪ A_hf) and numerical solutions of the density-matrix evolution for representative exchange values, Zeeman fields, and hyperfine strengths, overlaid on the experimental optical-orientation and optical-alignment data. These additions will demonstrate that only the hyperfine-dominated regime reproduces the observed slow polarization decay and its magnetic-field dependence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Hamiltonian applied to posited indirect-exciton states

full rationale

The derivation applies the conventional triplet-exciton Hamiltonian (electron-hole exchange + Zeeman + hyperfine) to the ensemble of spatially indirect excitons whose existence is stated as an input in the abstract and theory section. No equation reduces a fitted parameter to a 'prediction' by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and the hyperfine-dominated regime is obtained only for the subset of states whose exchange splitting is smaller than the nuclear fluctuation scale—an outcome that follows directly from the standard terms once the indirect-exciton premise is granted. The paper therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters; exchange interaction is stated to vary by orders of magnitude, suggesting it functions as a variable input rather than a derived quantity.

free parameters (1)
  • exchange interaction strength
    Varies by orders of magnitude across the ensemble to explain different spin dynamics regimes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Excitons are triplet states whose polarized photoluminescence is governed by exchange, Zeeman, and hyperfine interactions
    Invoked to develop the theory of polarized PL.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5791 in / 1179 out tokens · 24406 ms · 2026-06-26T13:19:55.656169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The corre- sponding typical field of the nuclear spin fluctuations is ∆ B =ℏ/( √ 2T∗ 2gµB). We take into account the nuclear spin dynamics by the Markov switching between all the values in the distribution (7) with the correlation time τc [74–76], which is much longer thanT∗

  2. [2]

    For the SIE this is not the case

    Note that the same Hamiltonian (6) is also relevant for the spatially direct excitons, but the hyperfine interaction for them is much smaller than the exchange interaction, so the sec- ond term can be omitted. For the SIE this is not the case. The optical alignment can be described similarly to Eq. (4a) by solving the Schrödinger equation with the Hamilto...

    2021

  3. [3]

    M. V. Kovalenko, L. Protesescu, M. I. Bondarchuk, Prop- erties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals.Science2017, 358, 745– 750

  4. [4]

    C. M. Sutter-Fella, Y. Li, M. Amani, J. W. Ager, F. M. Toma, E. Yablonovitch, I. D. Sharp and A. Javey, High photoluminescence quantum yield in band gap tunable bromide containing mixed halide perovskites,Nano Lett., 2016,16, 800–806

    2016

  5. [5]

    W. Ning, J. Bao, Y. Puttisong, F. Moro, L. Kobera, S. Shimono, L. Wang, F. Ji, M. Cuartero, S. Kawaguchi, S. Abbrent, H. Ishibashi, R. De Marco, I. A. Bouianova, G. A. Crespo, Y. Kubota, J. Brus, D. Y. Chung, L. Sun, W. M. Chen, M. G Kanatzidis, F. Gao, Magnetizing lead free halide double perovskites.Science Advances2020, 6, eabb5381

  6. [6]

    J. Wang, C. Zhang, H. Liu, R. McLaughlin, Y. Zhai, S. R. Vardeny, X. Liu, S. McGill, D. Semenov, H. Guo, R. Tsuchikawa, V. V. Deshpande, D. Sun, Z.V. Vardeny, Spin-optoelectronic devices based on hybrid organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites.Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 129

    2019

  7. [7]

    Y.-H. Kim, Y. Zhai, H. Lu, X. Pan, C. Xiao, E. A. Gaulding, S. P. Harvey, J. J. Berry, Z. V. Vardeny, J. M. Luther, M. C. Beard, Chiral-induced spin selectiv- ityenablesaroom-temperaturespinlight-emittingdiode. Science2021, 371, 1129

  8. [8]

    Protesescu, S

    L. Protesescu, S. Yakunin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, F. Krieg, R. Caputo, C. H. Hendon, R. X. Yang, A. Walsh, M. V. Kovalenko, Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide per- ovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel optoelec- tronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut.Nano Lett.2015, 15, 3692–3696

    2015

  9. [9]

    M. A. Becker, R. Vaxenburg, G. Nedelcu, P. C. Sercel, A. Shabaev, M. J. Mehl, J. G. Michopoulos, S. G. Lam- brakos, N. Bernstein, J. L. Lyons, Th. Stöferle, R. F. Mahrt, M. V. Kovalenko, D. J. Norris, G. Rainó, Al. L. Efros. Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide per- 11 ovskites.Nature2018,553, 189–193

  10. [10]

    C. Yin, L. Chen, N. Song, Y. Lv, F. Hu, C. Sun, W. W. Yu, C. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, and M. Xiao, Bright-exciton fine-structure splittings in sin- gle perovskite nanocrystals,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2017,119, 026401

    2017

  11. [11]

    M. Fu, Ph. Tamarat, H. Huang, J. Even, A. L. Ro- gach, B. Lounis. Neutral and charged exciton fine struc- ture in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals revealed by magneto-optical spectroscopy.Nano. Lett.2017, 17, 2895-2901

    2017

  12. [12]

    Y. Han, W. Liang, X. Lin, Y. Li, F. Sun, F. Zhang, P.S. Sercel, K. Wu, Lattice distortion inducing exciton split- ting and coherent quantum beating in CsPbI3 perovskite quantum dots.Nat. Materials2022, 21, 1282

  13. [13]

    K. Gao, Y. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, M. Liu, W. Liang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Zhu, K. Wu. Manipulating coherent exciton dynamics in CsPbI3 perovskite quantum dots us- ing magnetic field.Adv. Materials2024, 36, 2309420

  14. [14]

    S. R. Meliakov, E. A. Zhukov, V. V. Belykh, M. O. Nestoklon, E.V.Kolobkova, M.S.Kuznetsova, M.Bayer, and D. R. Yakovlev, Landég-factors of electrons and holes strongly confined in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrys- tals in glass.Nanoscale2025, 17, 6522

  15. [15]

    M. O. Nestoklon, E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, E. A. Zhukov, M. M. Glazov, M. A. Semina, E. L. Ivchenko, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, and M. Bayer, Tailor- ing the electron and hole Landé factors in lead halide per- ovskite nanocrystals by quantum confinement and halide exchange.Nano Lett.2023, 23, 8218–8224

    2023

  16. [16]

    S. R. Meliakov, E. A. Zhukov, V. V. Belykh, M. O. Nestoklon, E.V.Kolobkova, M.S.Kuznetsova, M.Bayer, and D. R. Yakovlev, Temperature dependence of the elec- tron and hole Landég-factors in CsPbI 3 nanocrystals embedded in a glass matrix.Nanoscale2024, 16, 21496

  17. [17]

    Ph. S. Grigoryev, V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Lhuillier, M. Bayer. Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr3 Colloidal Nanocrystals.Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 8481 – 8487

    2021

  18. [18]

    Kirstein and N

    E. Kirstein and N. E. Kopteva and D. R. Yakovlev and E. A. Zhukov and E. V. Kolobkova and M. S. Kuznetsova andV.V.BelykhandI.A.YugovaandM.M.Glazovand M. Bayer and A. Greilich, Mode locking of hole spin co- herences in CsPb(Cl,Br)3 perovskite nanocrystals,Nat. Commun., 2023,14, 699

    2023

  19. [19]

    V. O. Kozlov, I.A. Smirnov, M.S. Kuznetsova, E.V. Kolobkova, G.G. Kozlov, V.S. Zapasskii, D.S. Smirnov, I.I. Ryzhov. Spin noise reveals spin dynamics and recharging of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals.Applied Materials Today2025, 45, 102820

  20. [20]

    Quantum beats of exciton-polarons in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals

    A.V.Trifonov, M.O.Nestoklon, M.-A.Hollberg, S.Gris- ard, D. Kudlacik, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, S. V. Goupalov, J. M. Kaspari, D. E. Reiter, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, I. A. Akimov. Quantum beats of exciton-polarons in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals. cond-mat2025, arXiv:2510.14695

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Ch. Zhu, L. G. Feld, M. Svyrydenko, I. Cherniukh, D. N. Dirin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, V. Wood, N. Yazdani, S. C. Boehme, M. V. Kovalenko, G. Rainó. Quantifying the size-dependent exciton-phonon coupling strength in single lead-halide perovskite quantum dots.Adv. Optical Mater.2024, 12, 2301534

    2024

  22. [22]

    M. N. Bataev, M.S. Kuznetsova, D.V. Pankin, M.B. Smirnov, S.Yu. Verbin, I. V. Ignatiev, I. A. Eliseyev, V. Yu. Davydov, A. N. Smirnov, E. V. Kolobkova, Electron- phonon interaction in perovskite nanocrystals in fluo- rophosphate glass matrix.Semiconductors2024, 58, 103- 109

  23. [23]

    Harkort, I

    C. Harkort, I. V. Kalitukha, N. E. Kopteva, M. O. Nestoklon, S. V. Goupalov, L. Saviot, D. Kudlacik, D. R. Yakovlev, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, M. Bayer. Confined acoustic phonons in CsPbI3 nanocrys- tals explored by resonant Raman scattering on excitons. Nano Lett.2025, 25, 12754 – 12761

    2025

  24. [24]

    Y. Lv, C. Yin, C. Zhang, X. Wang, Z.-G. Yu, M. Xiao, Exciton-acoustic phonon coupling revealed by resonant excitation of single perovskite nanocrystals.Nature Com- mun.2021, 12, 2192

    2021

  25. [25]

    Ch. He, Z. Li, H. Jiang, S. Luo, W. Zhang, X. Qin. Po- larized luminescence in halide perovskite nanomaterials. Adv. Materials2025,e07400

  26. [26]

    P. C. Sercel, J. L. Lyons, D. Wickramaratne, R. Vaxen- burg, N. Bernstein, Al. L. Efros. Exciton fine structure in perovskite nanocrystals.Nano Lett.2019,19, 4068– 4077

    2019

  27. [27]

    L. Hou, Ph. Tamarat, B. Lounis. Revealing the exci- ton fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nanomaterials2021, 11, 1058

  28. [28]

    Tamarat, L

    Ph. Tamarat, L. Hou, J.-B. Trebbia, A. Swarnkar, L. Bi- adala, Y. Louyer, M. I. Bodnarchuk, M. V. Kovalenko, J. Even, B. Lounis. The dark exciton ground state promotes photon-pair emission in individual perovskite nanocrys- tals.Nat. Comm.2020, 11, 6001

    2020

  29. [29]

    Tamarat, M

    Ph. Tamarat, M. I. Bodnarchuk, J.-B. Trebbia, R. Erni, M. V. Kovalenko, J. Even, B. Lounis. The ground ex- citon state of formamidinium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals is a singlet dark state.Nat. Materials2019, 18, 717-724

  30. [30]

    V. V. Belykh, M. L. Skorikov, E. V. Kulebyakina, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, M. M. Glazov, D. R. Yakovlev, Submillisecond spin relaxation in CsPb(Cl,Br)3 perovskite nanocrystals in a glass matrix. Nano Lett.2022, 22, 4583–4588

    2022

  31. [31]

    H. Shi, X. Zhang, X. Sun, R. Chen, and X. Zhang, Di- rect and indirect recombination and thermal kinetics of excitons in colloidal all-inorganic lead halide perovskite nanocrystals,J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019,123, 19844-19850

    2019

  32. [32]

    L. Liu, F. Pevere, F. Zhang, H. Zhong, and I. Sy- chugov, Cation effect on excitons in perovskite nanocrys- tals from single-dot photoluminescence of CH3NH3PbI3, Phys. Rev. B, 2019,100, 19430

    2019

  33. [33]

    V. S. Chirvony, K. S. Sekerbayev, H. P. Adl, I. Suárez, Y. T. Taurbayev, A. F. Gualdrón-Reyes, I. Mora-Seró, J. P. Martínez-Pastor, Interpretation of the photolumines- cence decay kinetics in metal halide perovskite nanocrys- tals and thin polycrystalline films,Journal of Lumines- cence, 2020,221, 117092

    2020

  34. [34]

    M. A. Becker, C. Bernasconi, M. I. Bodnarchuk, G. Rainó, M. V. Kovalenko, D. J. Norris, R. F. Mahrt, Th. Stöferle, Unraveling the origin of the long fluores- cence decay component of cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals,ACS Nano, 2020,14, 14939-14946

    2020

  35. [35]

    D. S. Smirnov and E. L. Ivchenko, Theory of polarized photoluminescence of indirect band gap excitons in type- I quantum dots,Phys. Rev. B, 2023,108, 195432

    2023

  36. [36]

    Kudlacik, N

    D. Kudlacik, N. E. Kopteva, M. Kotur, D. R. Yakovlev, K. V. Kavokin, C. Harkort, M. Karzel, E. A. Zhukov, E. Evers, V. V. Belykh, and M. Bayer, Optical spin ori- 12 entation of localized electrons and holes interacting with nuclei in a FA0.9Cs0.1PbI2.8Br0.2perovskite crystal,ACS Photonics, 2024,11, 2757

    2024

  37. [37]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, E. Evers, E. A. Zhukov, V. V. Belykh, N. E. Kopteva, D. Kud- lacik, O. Nazarenko, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Lead-dominated hyperfine interaction impact- ing the carrier spin dynamics in halide perovskites,Adv. Mater., 2022,34, 2105263

    2022

  38. [38]

    Kotur, P

    M. Kotur, P. S. Bazhin, K. V. Kavokin, N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, D. Kudlacik, and M. Bayer, Dynamic polarization of nuclear spins by optically-oriented elec- trons and holes in lead halide perovskite semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B113, 085204 (2026)

    2026

  39. [39]

    Hyperfine interaction of electrons and holes with nuclei probed by optical orientation in MAPbI$_3$ perovskite crystals

    M. Kotur, N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, B. Turedi, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Hyperfine interaction of electrons and holes with nuclei probed by optical orien- tation in MAPbI3 perovskite crystals, arXiv:2602.07691 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    E.Kirstein, D.S.Smirnov, E.A.Zhukov, D.R.Yakovlev, N. E. Kopteva, D. N. Dirin, O. Hordiichuk, M. V. Ko- valenko, and M. Bayer, Evidencing the squeezed dark nuclear spin state in lead halide perovskites, Nat. Com- mun.14, 6683 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    S. R. Meliakov, E. A. Zhukov, V. V. Belykh, K.V. Ka- vokin, V. O. Nestoklon, E. V. Kulebyakina, M. L. Sko- rikov E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, M. Bayer, and D. R. Yakovlev, Hyperfine interaction of electrons con- fined in CsPbI3 nanocrystals with nuclear spin fluctua- tions,Phys. Rev. B, 2026,113, 035304

    2026

  42. [42]

    Protesescu, S

    L. Protesescu, S. Yakunin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, F. Krieg, R. Caputo, C. H. Hendon, R. X. Yang and A. Walsh, and M. V. Kovalenko, Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): novel optoelec- tronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut,Nano Lett., 2015,15, 3692–3696

    2015

  43. [43]

    L. Hou, P. Tamarat, and B. Lounis, Revealing the exci- ton fine structure in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals, Nanomaterials, 2021,11, 1058

    2021

  44. [44]

    E. V. Kulebyakina, M. L. Skorikov, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, M. N. Bataev, D. R. Yakovlev, and V. V. Belykh, Temperature-dependent photolumines- cence dynamics of CsPbBr3 and CsPb(Cl,Br)3 perovskite nanocrystals in a glass matrix,Phys. Rev. B, 2024,109, 235301

    2024

  45. [45]

    Canneson, E

    D. Canneson, E. V. Shornikova, D. R. Yakovlev, T. Rogge, A. A. Mitioglu, M. V. Ballottin, P. C. M. Chris- tianen, E. Lhuillier, M. Bayer, and L. Biadala, Nega- tively charged and dark excitons in CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals revealed by high magnetic fields,Nano Lett., 2017,17, 6177–6183

    2017

  46. [46]

    Q. Liu, Y. Wang, N. Sui, Y. Wang, X. Chi, Q. Wang, Y. Chen, W. Ji, L. Zou,H. Zhang, Exciton relaxation dy- namics in photo-excited CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals, Scientific Reports, 2016,6, 29442

    2016

  47. [47]

    T. S. Shamirzaev, J. Debus, D. S. Abramkin, D. Dunker, D.R.YakovlevandD.V.Dmitriev, A.K.Gutakovskii, L. S. Braginsky, K. S. Zhuravlev, and M. Bayer, Exciton re- combination dynamics in an ensemble of (In,Al)As/AlAs quantum dots with indirect band-gap and type-I band alignment,Phys. Rev. B, 2011,85, 155318

    2011

  48. [48]

    M. O. Nestoklon, S. V. Goupalov, R. I. Dzhioev, O. S. Ken, V. L. Korenev, Yu. G. Kusrayev, V. F. Sapega, C. de Weerd, L. Gomez, T. Gregorkiewicz, J. Lin, K. Suenaga, Y. Fujiwara, L. B. Matyushkin, and I. N. Yassievich, Optical orientation and alignment of excitons in ensembles of inorganic perovskite nanocrystals,Phys. Rev. B, 2018,97, 235304. [49]Optical...

    2018

  49. [49]

    R. I. Dzhioev, H. M. Gibbs, E. L. Ivchenko, G. Khitrova, V. L. Korenev, M. N. Tkachuk, and B. P. Zakharchenya, Determination of interface preference by observation of linear-to-circular polarization conversion under optical orientation of excitons in type-II GaAs/AlAs superlat- tices,Phys. Rev. B, 1997,56, 13405

    1997

  50. [50]

    G. V. Astakhov, T. Kiessling, A. V. Platonov, T. Slobod- skyy, S. Mahapatra, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, K. Brunner, and L. W. Molenkamp, Circular-to-linear and linear-to- circular conversion of optical polarization by semiconduc- tor quantum dots,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006,96, 027402. [53]Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures, E. L. Ivchenko, Alpha ...

    2006

  51. [51]

    V. V. Belykh, M. M. Glazov, S. R. Meliakov, D. R. Yakovlev, E. V. Kulebyakina, M. L. Skorikov, M. V. Kochiev, M. S. Kuznetsova, E. V. Kolobkova, and M. Bayer, Millisecond-long electron spin lifetime in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals revealed by optically detected magnetic resonance,ArXive CondMat, 2026, http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03038

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov and E. A. Zhukov, D. Kudlacik, I. V. Kalitukha, V. F. Sapega, G. S. Dimitriev, M. A. Semina, M. O. Nestoklon, E. L. Ivchenko, N. E. Kopteva, D. N. Dirin, O. Nazarenko, M. V. Kovalenko, A. Baumann, J. Höcker, V. Dyakonov, and M. Bayer, The Landé factors of electrons and holes in lead halide perovskites: universal d...

    2022

  53. [53]

    V. L. Zhiliakov, N. E. Kopteva, I. A. Yugova, D. R. Yakovlev, I. A. Akimov, and M. Bayer, Exciton spin structure in lead halide perovskite semiconductors ex- plored via spin dynamics in a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. B, 2026,113, 155206

    2026

  54. [54]

    E. M. Gamarts, E. L. Ivchenko, G. E. Pikus, B. S. Razbirin, V. I. Safarov, and A. N. Starukhin, Magnetic- field-induced orientation-alignment transition on bound excitons in GaSe crystals,Sov. Phys. Solid State, 1982, 24, 1320

    1982

  55. [55]

    E. M. Gamarts, E. L. Ivchenko, M. I. Karaman, V. P. Mushinski, G. E. Pikus, B. S. Razbirin, and A. N. Starukhin, Optical orientation and alignment of free ex- citons in GaSe during resonance excitation. Experiment, Sov. Phys. JETP, 1977,46, 590

    1977

  56. [56]

    L Ivchenko, G

    E. L Ivchenko, G. E. Pikus, B. S. Razbirin, and A. N. Starukhin, Optical orientation and alignment of free ex- citons in GaSe during resonant excitation - Theory,Sov. Phys. JETP, 1977,45, 1172

    1977

  57. [57]

    Miyajima, Y

    K. Miyajima, Y. Umemura, K. Katayama, M. Ashida, and T. Itoh, Magnetic-field induced mixing of singlet and triplet excitons confined in CuCl quantum dots,Phys. Stat. Sol. (c), 2009,6, 53

    2009

  58. [58]

    Nomura, K

    S. Nomura, K. Misawa, Y. Segawa, and T. Kobayashi, Largegvalue in CuCl semiconductor microcrystallites, Phys. Rev. B, 1993,47, 16024–16027

    1993

  59. [59]

    Kudlacik, A

    D. Kudlacik, A. E. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Qiang, M. A. Semina, A. A. Golovatenko, A. V. Rodina, A. L. 13 Efros, A. I. Ekimov, and M. Bayer, Landégfactors and spin dynamics of charge carriers in CuCl nanocrystals in a glass matrix,Phys. Rev. B, 2025,111, 085423

    2025

  60. [60]

    M. Fu, P. Tamarat, H. Huang, J. Even, A. L. Rogach, and B. Lounis, Neutral and charged exciton fine struc- ture in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals revealed by magneto-optical spectroscopy,Nano Lett., 2017,17, 2895

    2017

  61. [61]

    Tamarat, M

    P. Tamarat, M. I. Bodnarchuk, J.-B. Trebbia, R. Erni, M. V. Kovalenko, J. Even, and B. Lounis, Ground ex- citon state of formamidinium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals is a singlet dark state,Nat. Mater., 2019, 18, 717–724

    2019

  62. [62]

    Tamarat, E

    P. Tamarat, E. Prin, Y. Berezovska, A. Moskalenko, Thi Phuc Tan Nguyen, Chenghui Xia, Lei Hou, J.-B. Treb- bia, M. Zacharias, L. Pedesseau, C. Katan, M. I. Bodnar- chuk, M.V.Kovalenko, J.Even, andB.Lounis, Universal scaling laws for charge-carrier interactions with quantum confinement in lead-halide perovskites,Nat. Commun., 2023,14, 229

    2023

  63. [63]

    C. Yin, Y. Lv, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. W. Yu, C. Zhang, Z.-G.Yu, X.Wang, andM.Xiao, Transitionfromdoublet to triplet excitons in single perovskite nanocrystals,J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2020,11, 5750–5755

    2020

  64. [64]

    D. S. Smirnov and E. L. Ivchenko, Random fine structure and polarized luminescenceof triplet excitons in semicon- ductor nanocrystals,arXiv2603.28552, 2026. [68]Random matrices, Madan Lal Mehta,142, Elsevier, 2004. [69]Symmetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors, G. L. Bir and G. E. Pikus, Halsted Press, New York, 1974

    work page arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    S. Zhao, Z. Li, Z. A. Iakovlev, P. Ji, T. Jiang, F. Lin, X. Huang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. M. Glazov, A. S. Baimuratov, and A. Högele, Strain-controlled atomic re- construction and quasi-1D excitons in moiré heterostruc- tures,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2026,136, 176201

    2026

  66. [66]

    V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, Ph. S. Grigoryev, M. Hussain, J. Rautert, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr3 perovskite crystals,Nat. Commun., 2019,10, 673. [72]Electron & Nuclear Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Nanostructures, M.M. Glazov, Oxford University Press, 2018

    2019

  67. [67]

    Nedelea, N

    V. Nedelea, N. V. Leppenen, E. Evers, D. S. Smirnov, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Tuning the nuclei-induced spin relaxation of localized electrons by the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects,Phys. Rev. Res., 2023,5, L032032

    2023

  68. [68]

    M. M. Glazov, Spin noise of localized electrons: Interplay of hopping and hyperfine interaction,Phys. Rev. B, 2019, 91, 195301

    2019

  69. [69]

    Bayer, and A

    D.S.Smirnov, E.A.Zhukov, D.R.Yakovlev, E.Kirstein, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin polarization recovery and Hanle effect for charge carriers interacting with nu- clear spins in semiconductors,Phys. Rev. B, 2020,102, 235413

    2020

  70. [70]

    Kotur, P

    M. Kotur, P. S. Bazhin, K. V. Kavokin, N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, D. Kudlacik, and M. Bayer, Dynamic polarization of nuclear spins by optically-oriented elec- trons and holes in lead halide perovskite semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B, 2026,113, 085204

    2026

  71. [71]

    T. S. Shamirzaev, J. Rautert, D. R. Yakovlev, J. De- bus, A. Yu. Gornov, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, and M. Bayer, Spin dynamics and magnetic field induced po- larization of excitons in ultrathin GaAs/AlAs quantum wells with indirect band gap and type-II band alignment, Phys. Rev. B, 2017,96, 035302

    2017

  72. [72]

    Annapurna and S

    K. Annapurna and S. Buddhudu, Characterization of flu- orophosphate optical glasses,J. Sol. St. Chem., 1991,93, 454–460

    1991

  73. [73]

    D. R. Yakovlev, S. A. Crooker, M. A. Semina, J. Rautert, J. Mund, D. N. Dirin, and M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Exciton polaritons in CsPbBr3 crystals revealed by optical reflectivity in high magnetic fields and two- photon spectroscopy,Phys. Stat. Sol. (RRL), 2024,18, 2300407

    2024

  74. [74]

    Non-Cryst

    E.V.Kolobkova, M.S.Kuznetsova, andN.V.Nikonorov, Perovskite CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) nanocrystals in flu- orophosphate glasses,J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2021,563, 20811. S1 Supplementary Information: Hyperfine versus exchange interaction in spin dynamics of spatially indirect excitons in CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals Timur S. Shamirzaev, Nataliia E. Kopteva, D...

    work page arXiv 2021