pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21598 · v1 · pith:KQ4QJNTKnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ⚛️ nucl-th

One-Body and Two-Body Density Matrix Elements in a Symplectic Many-Body Basis

Jakub Herko (1 , 2) , Mark A. Caprio (1) ((1) Department of Physics , Astronomy , University of Notre Dame , (2) TRIUMF) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords symplectic no-core configuration interactiondensity matrix elementsrecurrence relationsnuclear structureab initio methodsmany-body basisone-body operatorstwo-body operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recurrence relations are derived for one-body and two-body density matrix elements between symplectic many-body basis states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives recurrence relations to calculate one-body and two-body density matrix elements between SpNCCI basis states. These relations support integration of the SpNCCI framework with other many-body methods. A reader would care because the relations make it possible to obtain matrix elements for any one-body or two-body operator. The work rests on the approximate symplectic symmetry built into the choice of many-body basis states.

Core claim

Recurrence relations can be derived that allow calculation of the one-body and two-body density matrix elements between SpNCCI basis states. With these elements available, the framework can be combined with other modern many-body methods and matrix elements of arbitrary one-body or two-body operators can be evaluated.

What carries the argument

Recurrence relations for one-body and two-body density matrix elements evaluated between symplectic no-core configuration interaction basis states.

If this is right

  • The SpNCCI framework can be integrated with other modern many-body methods.
  • Matrix elements of any one-body or two-body operator can be calculated within the framework.
  • Observables that depend on one-body or two-body operators become accessible without separate derivations for each operator.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relations could reduce computational cost when many different operators must be evaluated in the same basis.
  • Extension to three-body operators might follow by similar recurrence techniques if the same symmetry properties hold.

Load-bearing premise

The recurrence relations are correctly derived and remain numerically stable when applied to the SpNCCI basis states.

What would settle it

Direct evaluation of selected one-body and two-body density matrix elements in a small SpNCCI space followed by comparison against the values produced by the recurrence relations.

read the original abstract

The symplectic no-core configuration interaction (SpNCCI) framework is an ab initio many-body method for nuclear structure which makes use of the approximate symplectic symmetry of nuclei by appropriate choice of many-body basis states. In this paper we derive recurrence relations allowing for calculation of one-body and two-body density matrix elements between the SpNCCI basis states. Availability of these matrix elements allows for integration of the SpNCCI framework with other modern many-body methods and for calculation of matrix elements of any one-body or two-body operator.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives recurrence relations for one-body and two-body density matrix elements between states in the symplectic no-core configuration interaction (SpNCCI) basis. These relations are obtained using the Sp(3,R) generators and basis-state overlaps, enabling computation of matrix elements for arbitrary one- and two-body operators and integration of SpNCCI with other many-body methods.

Significance. If the derived recurrence relations hold as stated, the work provides a practical computational tool that extends the utility of the SpNCCI framework in ab initio nuclear structure theory. The explicit treatment of the symplectic generators and the recursive structure for numerical stability are strengths that support broader applications, such as operator evaluations without full-basis recomputation.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a short statement on the range of Sp(3,R) generators explicitly used in the recurrence derivations to orient readers unfamiliar with the symplectic algebra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. The assessment that the recurrence relations provide a practical computational tool for extending the SpNCCI framework is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper derives recurrence relations for one- and two-body density matrix elements directly from the Sp(3,R) generators, basis-state overlaps, and symplectic symmetry properties of the SpNCCI framework. No equations reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the relations are obtained via explicit algebraic steps on the many-body basis. The central claim is therefore self-contained against external group-theoretic benchmarks and does not rely on renaming or smuggling of prior results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Ledger is empty by necessity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5638 in / 1021 out tokens · 17976 ms · 2026-06-26T12:35:00.646636+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The correspond- ing annihilation operatorsa N lmlms, as obtained by simple Hermitian conjugation of the creation operators, do not form a standard basis for an SU(3)×SU S(2) irreducible tensor. Therefore, one needs to introduce the related operators ˜a (0,N) 1 2 lmlms = (−1)N+l−m l+ 1 2 −msaN l−ml−ms,(5) which do transform as a standard basis of tensor ch...

  2. [2]

    T. D. Morris, J. Simonis, S. R. Stroberg, C. Stumpf, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. Papenbrock, R. Roth, and A. Schwenk, Structure of the lightest tin isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 152503 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Gysbers, G

    P. Gysbers, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, P. Navr´ atil, T. Papenbrock, S. Quaglioni, A. Schwenk, S. R. Stroberg, and K. A. Wendt, Discrepancy between experimental and theoreticalβ- decay rates resolved from first principles, Nat. Phys.15, 428 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    J. M. Yao, B. Bally, J. Engel, R. Wirth, T. R. Rodr´ ıguez, and H. Hergert,Ab initiotreatment of collective correlations and the neutrinoless double beta decay of 48Ca, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 232501 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    S. R. Stroberg, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, and J. Simonis,Ab initiolimits of atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 022501 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, Front

    H. Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, Front. Phys.8, 1 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Belley, C

    A. Belley, C. G. Payne, S. R. Stroberg, T. Miyagi, and J. D. Holt,Ab initioneutrinoless double-beta decay matrix elements for 48Ca, 76Ge, and 82Se, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 042502 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    B. S. Hu, Z. H. Sun, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock,Ab initiocomputations of strongly deformed nuclei near 80Zr, Phys. Rev. C110, L011302 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    B. Hu, W. Jiang, T. Miyagi, Z. Sun, A. Ekstr¨ om, C. Forss´ en, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, T. Papenbrock, S. R. Stroberg, and I. Vernon, Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces, Nat. Phys.18, 1196 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Rosensteel and D

    G. Rosensteel and D. J. Rowe, The discrete series of Sp(n,R), Int. J. Theor. Phys.16, 63 (1977)

    1977

  11. [11]

    D. J. Rowe, B. G. Wybourne, and P. H. Butler, Unitary representations, branching rules and matrix elements for the non-compact symplectic groups, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.18, 939 (1985). 23

    1985

  12. [12]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Sviratcheva, C. Bahri, J. P. Draayer, and J. P. Vary, Evidence for symplectic symmetry inab initiono-core shell model results for light nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 162503 (2007)

    2007

  13. [13]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Sviratcheva, C. Bahri, J. P. Draayer, and J. P. Vary, Dominant role of symplectic symmetry inab initiono-core shell model results for light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C76, 014315 (2007)

    2007

  14. [14]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, J. P. Draayer, D. J. Rowe, J. L. Wood, G. Rosensteel, C. Bahri, D. Langr, and R. B. Baker, Physics of nuclei: Key role of an emergent symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 042501 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    K. D. Launey, T. Dytrych, G. H. Sargsyan, R. B. Baker, and J. P. Draayer, Emergent symplectic symmetry in atomic nuclei, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.229, 2429 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    A. E. McCoy,Ab initio multi-irrep symplectic no-core configuration interaction calculations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    A. E. McCoy, M. A. Caprio, and T. Dytrych, Symplectic no-core configuration interaction framework forab initionuclear structure, Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Phys. Chem. Sci.3, 17 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    A. E. McCoy, M. A. Caprio, P. J. Fasano, and T. Dytrych, Symplectic no-core configuration interaction framework for nuclear structure, J. Phys. G (submitted), arXiv:2604.11940 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    D. J. Rowe, Coherent state theory of the noncompact symplectic group, J. Math. Phys.25, 2662 (1984)

    1984

  20. [20]

    D. J. Rowe, Analytical expressions for the matrix elements of the non-compact symplectic algebra, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.17, L399 (1984)

    1984

  21. [21]

    D. J. Rowe, A. E. McCoy, and M. A. Caprio, The many-nucleon theory of nuclear collective structure and its macroscopic limits: An algebraic perspective, Phys. Scr.91, 033003 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    E. J. Reske, Sp(6,R)symmetry and the giant quadrupole resonance in 24Mg, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan (1984)

    1984

  23. [23]

    Suzuki and K

    Y. Suzuki and K. T. Hecht, Symplectic and cluster excitations in nuclei: Evaluation of interaction matrix elements, Nucl. Phys. A455, 315 (1986)

    1986

  24. [24]

    M. A. Caprio, A. E. McCoy, and P. J. Fasano, Intrinsic operators for the translationally-invariant many-body problem, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.47, 122001 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    R. Roth, S. Binder, K. Vobig, A. Calci, J. Langhammer, and P. Navr´ atil, Medium-mass nuclei with normal-ordered chiralNN+ 3Ninteractions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 052501 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    Gebrerufael, A

    E. Gebrerufael, A. Calci, and R. Roth, Open-shell nuclei and excited states from multireference normal- ordered hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. C93, 031301 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Hebeler, V

    K. Hebeler, V. Durant, J. Hoppe, M. Heinz, A. Schwenk, J. Simonis, and A. Tichai, Normal ordering of three-nucleon interactions forab ibitiocalculations of heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C107, 024310 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Tsukiyama, S

    K. Tsukiyama, S. K. Bogner, and A. Schwenk, In-medium similarity renormalization group for nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 222502 (2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    S. K. Bogner, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, S. Binder, A. Calci, J. Langhammer, and R. Roth, Nonperturbative shell-model interactions from the in-medium similarity renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 142501 (2014). 24

    2014

  30. [30]

    S. R. Stroberg, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, S. K. Bogner, and A. Schwenk, Ground and excited states of doubly open-shell nuclei fromab initiovalence-space Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. C93, 051301(R) (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    Hergert, S

    H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, The in-medium similarity renormalization group: A novelab initiomethod for nuclei, Phys. Rep.621, 165 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    Y. C. Tang, M. LeMere, and D. R. Thompson, Resonating-group method for nuclear many-body prob- lems, Phys. Rep.47, 167 (1978)

    1978

  33. [33]

    Quaglioni and P

    S. Quaglioni and P. Navr´ atil,Ab initiomany-body calculations ofn- 3H,n- 4He,p- 3,4He, andn- 10Be scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 092501 (2008)

    2008

  34. [34]

    Quaglioni and P

    S. Quaglioni and P. Navr´ atil,Ab initiomany-body calculations of nucleon-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. C79, 044606 (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Navr´ atil, S

    P. Navr´ atil, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin, C. Romero-Redondo, and A. Calci, Unifiedab initioapproaches to nuclear structure and reactions, Phys. Scr.91, 053002 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Escher,Electron scattering studies in the framework of the symplectic shell model, Ph.D

    J. Escher,Electron scattering studies in the framework of the symplectic shell model, Ph.D. thesis, Louisiana State University (1997)

    1997

  37. [37]

    Escher and J

    J. Escher and J. P. Draayer, Fermion realization of the nuclear Sp(6,R) model, J. Math. Phys.39, 5123 (1998)

    1998

  38. [38]

    Herko,Ab initio description of nuclear structure and reactions in a unified framework, Ph.D

    J. Herko,Ab initio description of nuclear structure and reactions in a unified framework, Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    D. J. Rowe, Microscopic theory of the nuclear collective model, Rep. Prog. Phys.48, 1419 (1985)

    1985

  40. [40]

    Quesne and M

    C. Quesne and M. Moshinsky, Canonical transformations and matrix elements, J. Math. Phys.12, 1780 (1971)

    1971

  41. [41]

    J. P. Elliott, Collective motion in the nuclear shell model I. classification schemes for states of mixed configurations, Proc. R. Soc. A245, 128 (1958)

    1958

  42. [42]

    Rosensteel, Sp(3,R) tensors in nuclear physics, inGroup Theory and Special Symmetries in Nuclear Physics, edited by J

    G. Rosensteel, Sp(3,R) tensors in nuclear physics, inGroup Theory and Special Symmetries in Nuclear Physics, edited by J. P. Draayer and J. J¨ anecke (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) p. 332

    1992

  43. [43]

    Escher and A

    J. Escher and A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in the symplectic shell model, Phys. Rev. C 65, 054309 (2002)

    2002

  44. [44]

    Rosensteel, Irreducible U(3) tensor interactions in the symplectic collective model, Nucl

    G. Rosensteel, Irreducible U(3) tensor interactions in the symplectic collective model, Nucl. Phys. A 341, 397 (1980)

    1980

  45. [45]

    J. P. Draayer, Structure calculations for 25Mg-25Al, Nucl. Phys. A216, 457 (1973)

    1973

  46. [46]

    F. Q. Luo, M. A. Caprio, and T. Dytrych, Construction of the center-of-mass free space for the SU(3) no-core shell model, Nucl. Phys. A897, 109 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    J. P. Draayer, T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, and D. Langr, Symmetry-adapted no-core shell model appli- cations for light nuclei with QCD-inspired interactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.67, 516 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, J. P. Draayer, P. Maris, J. P. Vary, E. Saule, U. Catalyurek, M. Sosonkina, D. Langr, and M. A. Caprio, Collective modes in light nuclei from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 252501 (2013). 25

    2013

  49. [49]

    Dytrych, P

    T. Dytrych, P. Maris, K. D. Launey, J. P. Draayer, J. P. Vary, D. Langr, E. Saule, M. A. Caprio, U. Catalyurek, and M. Sosonkina, Efficacy of the SU(3) scheme forab initiolarge-scale calculations beyond the lightest nuclei, Comput. Phys. Commun.207, 202 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Langr, T

    D. Langr, T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, and J. P. Draayer, Accelerating many-nucleon basis generation for high performance computing enabled ab initio nuclear structure studies, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl.33, 522 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Rosensteel and D

    G. Rosensteel and D. J. Rowe, On the algebraic formulation of collective models III. The symplectic shell model of collective motion, Ann. Phys.126, 343 (1980)

    1980

  52. [52]

    D. J. Rowe, Resolution of missing label problems; a new perspective onK-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys.36, 1520 (1995)

    1995

  53. [53]

    K. T. Hecht,The vector coherent state method and its application to problems of higher symmetry, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 290 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987)

    1987

  54. [54]

    D. J. Rowe, R. L. Blanc, and K. T. Hecht, Vector coherent state theory and its application to the orthogonal groups, J. Math. Phys.29, 287 (1988)

    1988

  55. [55]

    Bahri and J

    C. Bahri and J. P. Draayer, SU(3) reduced matrix element package, Comput. Phys. Commun.83, 59 (1994)

    1994

  56. [56]

    Rosensteel and D

    G. Rosensteel and D. J. Rowe, u(3)-boson model of nuclear collective motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 223 (1981)

    1981

  57. [57]

    D. J. Rowe and G. Rosensteel, Rotational bands in the u(3)-boson model, Phys. Rev. C25, 3236(R) (1982)

    1982

  58. [58]

    K. T. Hecht, SU 3 recoupling and fractional parentage in the 2s-1d shell, Nucl. Phys.62, 1 (1965)

    1965

  59. [59]

    Akiyama and J

    Y. Akiyama and J. P. Draayer, A user’s guide to Fortran programs for Wigner and Racah coefficients of SU3, Comput. Phys. Commun.5, 405 (1973)

    1973

  60. [60]

    Dytrych, D

    T. Dytrych, D. Langr, J. P. Draayer, K. D. Launey, and D. Gazda, SU3lib: A C++ library for accurate computation of Wigner and Racah coefficients of SU(3), Comput. Phys. Commun.269, 108137 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    Herko, M

    J. Herko, M. A. Caprio, A. E. McCoy, and P. J. Fasano, A modern Fortran library for SU(3) coupling and recoupling coefficients, Eur. Phys. J. A62, 95 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Rosensteel and D

    G. Rosensteel and D. J. Rowe, An analytic formula for u(3)-boson matrix elements, J. Math. Phys.24, 2461 (1983)

    1983

  63. [63]

    K. T. Hecht, E. J. Reske, T. H. Seligman, and W. Zahn, Spectroscopic amplitudes for complex cluster systems, Nucl. Phys. A356, 146 (1981)

    1981

  64. [64]

    A. E. McCoyet al., computer codespncci