pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24580 · v1 · pith:IDEGK34Tnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Quantum droplets and condensates in an optical lattice coupled to a dissipative cavity: Collective excitations and non-equilibrium dynamics

G. Vivek , Sudip Sinha , Subhasis Sinha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 21:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Bose gasquantum dropletsoptical latticedissipative cavitypolariton excitationsnon-equilibrium dynamicsdensity orderingcollective modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling a lossy cavity to a Bose gas in an optical lattice produces a polariton-like mode whose frequency softens and whose relaxation time diverges at the density-ordering transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines a dilute Bose gas and self-bound quantum droplets placed in a one-dimensional optical lattice and coupled to a single lossy cavity mode. The authors apply a classical-field treatment to locate the stationary states and to extract the spectrum of collective excitations. In addition to the usual Bogoliubov modes they find a gapped, polariton-like branch whose frequency decreases toward zero as the cavity coupling approaches the threshold for density ordering. The same mode’s relaxation time grows without bound at that point, marking the transition as intrinsically non-equilibrium. The work further shows that cavity-field fluctuations can excite this mode and that certain kink and double-droplet configurations persist in the time evolution even after they have become linearly unstable.

Core claim

In this driven-dissipative lattice system the excitation spectrum contains a polariton-like gapped mode whose frequency softens as a precursor of density ordering; the mode’s relaxation time diverges on approach to the critical point, establishing the non-equilibrium character of the transition. Cavity fluctuations can be used to probe the mode through resulting spatio-temporal oscillations of the atomic density. In the droplet regime bound modes appear that reflect the self-bound non-equilibrium character, and solitonic configurations (condensate kinks, double droplets) remain visible in the dynamics beyond the linear instability threshold, analogous to scarring.

What carries the argument

The polariton-like gapped excitation generated by the linear coupling between atomic density fluctuations and the cavity field; its frequency softening and diverging relaxation time are extracted from the classical-field equations of motion.

If this is right

  • The polariton-like mode frequency decreases toward zero as the density-ordering transition is approached.
  • The relaxation time of the polariton-like mode diverges at the critical point, indicating non-equilibrium critical behavior.
  • Cavity-field fluctuations generate observable spatio-temporal oscillations in both condensate and droplet states.
  • Bound modes in the droplet regime carry signatures of the non-equilibrium self-bound state.
  • Kink and double-droplet solitonic configurations remain visible in the dynamics even after linear instability sets in beyond a critical coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cavity loss supplies an experimentally tunable handle on non-equilibrium critical points without requiring direct atomic dissipation.
  • The persistence of unstable solitonic states after a quench may be tested by monitoring the long-time density profile following a sudden change in cavity detuning.
  • The same softening-and-divergence signature could be sought in two-dimensional lattices or in cavities with multiple modes to map the dependence on dimensionality and photon number.
  • Time-resolved detection of the cavity output field offers a direct route to extract the diverging relaxation time without imaging the atomic cloud.

Load-bearing premise

The classical-field description remains quantitatively reliable for the stationary states and for the softening polariton mode together with its diverging relaxation time right up to the density-ordering critical point.

What would settle it

A measurement of the gapped excitation’s frequency and decay rate while the cavity-atom coupling is ramped toward the density-ordering threshold; the frequency must fall to zero while the relaxation time must increase without bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24580 by G. Vivek, Subhasis Sinha, Sudip Sinha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent experiments on light-matter interacting systems, we investigate a dilute Bose gas and self-bound quantum droplets in a one-dimensional optical lattice coupled to a lossy cavity mode. Using a classical-field approach, we determine the stationary states and collective excitations of this non-equilibrium system. Apart from the usual Bogoliubov modes, we identify a polariton-like gapped excitation, the frequency of which softens as a precursor of the density ordering transition. Moreover, its relaxation time diverges as the critical point is approached, signaling the non-equilibrium nature of this transition. Dynamically, this polariton-like mode can be probed by inducing cavity field fluctuations, which in turn generates spatio-temporal oscillations of both the condensate and droplet states. In the droplet regime, we also analyze the bound modes which bear the characteristics of such non-equilibrium self-bound state. In addition, we uncover solitonic non-equilibrium states, including condensate with kink-like configuration and double-droplet state, and investigate their robustness following a sudden quench. Remarkably, although these states become unstable beyond a critical coupling, they continue to manifest in the dynamics, akin to the scarring phenomena. Our results demonstrate that dissipative cavity coupling provides a versatile route for exploring rich non-equilibrium dynamics of condensates and quantum droplets within experimentally accessible settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a dilute Bose gas and self-bound quantum droplets in a one-dimensional optical lattice coupled to a lossy cavity mode. Using a classical-field approach, it determines stationary states and collective excitations, identifying a polariton-like gapped mode whose frequency softens as a precursor to the density-ordering transition with a diverging relaxation time; it further examines bound modes in the droplet regime, solitonic states (kink-like condensates and double-droplet configurations), and their post-quench dynamics, including persistence of unstable states reminiscent of scarring.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work provides a concrete demonstration that dissipative cavity coupling can induce non-equilibrium signatures such as mode softening with critical slowing and persistent unstable configurations in both condensates and quantum droplets, offering experimentally accessible routes for probing light-matter systems beyond equilibrium Bogoliubov theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and opening of the methods section: the reported softening of the polariton-like mode and divergence of its relaxation time are obtained within the classical-field treatment, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit justification, fluctuation correction, or benchmark against a quantum method for the validity of this approximation near the density-ordering critical point where cavity loss couples amplitude and phase fluctuations; this is load-bearing for the claim that the divergence signals the non-equilibrium nature of the transition.
  2. [Dynamical section] Section on dynamical probing and quench dynamics: the persistence of unstable solitonic states after a sudden quench is presented as a scarring-like phenomenon, but without a quantitative assessment of how cavity dissipation modifies the classical equations of motion near criticality, it remains unclear whether the reported spatio-temporal oscillations and robustness are robust to quantum corrections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the cavity loss rate and lattice parameters should be defined at first use to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the excitation spectra could explicitly state the system parameters used (e.g., atom number, cavity detuning) rather than referring only to the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and opening of the methods section: the reported softening of the polariton-like mode and divergence of its relaxation time are obtained within the classical-field treatment, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit justification, fluctuation correction, or benchmark against a quantum method for the validity of this approximation near the density-ordering critical point where cavity loss couples amplitude and phase fluctuations; this is load-bearing for the claim that the divergence signals the non-equilibrium nature of the transition.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the classical-field approach is an approximation and that near the critical point, quantum fluctuations could play a role. The manuscript focuses on the classical limit, which is appropriate for the dilute Bose gas under consideration, as is common in studies of quantum droplets and condensates. We will revise the methods section to include a brief justification for the validity of the classical-field treatment, referencing the parameter regime where mean-field and classical approximations hold, and note that the observed mode softening and diverging relaxation time are features within this framework that highlight non-equilibrium aspects. A full quantum benchmark is beyond the scope of this work but represents an interesting direction for future research. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Dynamical section] Section on dynamical probing and quench dynamics: the persistence of unstable solitonic states after a sudden quench is presented as a scarring-like phenomenon, but without a quantitative assessment of how cavity dissipation modifies the classical equations of motion near criticality, it remains unclear whether the reported spatio-temporal oscillations and robustness are robust to quantum corrections.

    Authors: The dynamics are governed by the classical equations including cavity dissipation, which leads to the observed spatio-temporal oscillations and the persistence of the unstable states. We will add a discussion clarifying that these results are obtained within the classical-field model and that the scarring-like behavior is a feature of the dissipative classical dynamics. Quantitative assessment of quantum corrections would require advanced quantum simulation techniques not employed here; we will note this limitation and suggest it as a possible extension. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via classical-field model

full rationale

The paper applies a classical-field approach to compute stationary states and excitations from the underlying model equations. No load-bearing step reduces a reported prediction (e.g., mode softening or relaxation-time divergence) to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The polariton-like mode and its properties emerge directly from the non-equilibrium dynamics without evidence of self-definitional loops or renamed inputs. This is the expected outcome for a model-derived analysis that does not invoke fitted observables as predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The classical-field treatment implicitly relies on standard mean-field assumptions for dilute Bose gases and on a Markovian loss model for the cavity; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are named in the provided text.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Classical-field (Gross-Pitaevskii-like) description suffices for stationary states and linear excitations of the cavity-coupled system.
    Invoked by the choice of method stated in the abstract; no justification or regime of validity is supplied.
  • domain assumption Cavity loss can be treated as a constant rate without back-action on the mode structure beyond the mean-field level.
    Implicit in the lossy-cavity setup described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5771 in / 1500 out tokens · 24995 ms · 2026-06-25T21:55:11.343484+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references

  1. [1]

    To analyze the formation of the density-modulated structure arising from the instability of the homogeneous states, we introduce a two sub-lattice ansatz for which the condensate wavefunctions are parametrized by a density imbalance∆ between the even and odd lattice sites, given by, ¯χeven = p n0(1 + ∆),¯χ odd = p n0(1−∆),(13) wheren 0 is the average on-s...

  2. [2]

    In the presence of dissipation (κ̸= 0), the variation of the frequencyω p− of the lower excitation branch, with the atom-photon couplingλis shown in Fig. 1(d). In the limit ofλ→0,ω p− approaches the frequency of the cavity fieldω 0, whereasω p+ reduces to the Bogoliubov modeω(k=π). As evident from Fig. 1(d), the mode frequencyω p− of the lowest excitation...

  3. [3]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems(WorldScientific, Sin- gapore, 2008)

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems(WorldScientific, Sin- gapore, 2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum Trajectories and Open Many-Body Quan- tum Systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Weimer, A

    H. Weimer, A. Kshetrimayum, and R. Or´ us, Simulation meth- ods for open quantum many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015008 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir `o, Many-body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes99, 1 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum States and Phases in Driven Open Quantum Systems with Cold Atoms, Nat. Phys.4, 878 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Tomadin, A. Micheli, R. Fazio, and P. Zoller, Dynamical Phase Transitions and Instabilities in Open Atomic Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 015702 (2010)

    2010

  10. [10]

    Dimer, B

    F. Dimer, B. Estienne, A. S. Parkins, and H. J. Carmichael, Proposed realization of the Dicke-model quantum phase tran- sition in an optical cavity QED system, Phys. Rev. A75, 013804 (2007)

    2007

  11. [11]

    Morrison and A

    S. Morrison and A. S. Parkins, Collective spin systems in dispersive optical cavity QED: Quantum phase transitions and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A77, 043810 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, A. Imamoglu, S. F. Yelin, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Dissipative phase transition in a central spin system, Phys. Rev. A86, 012116 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    L. M. Sieberer, S. D. Huber, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Dynam- ical Critical Phenomena in Driven-Dissipative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  14. [14]

    Le Boit ´e, G

    A. Le Boit ´e, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Steady-State Phases and Tunneling-Induced Instabilities in the Driven Dissipative Bose Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 233601 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Kulkarni, B

    M. Kulkarni, B. ¨Oztop, and H. E. T¨ ureci, Cavity-mediated near- critical dissipative dynamics of a driven condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 220408 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    H. J. Carmichael, Breakdown of Photon Blockade: A Dissi- pative Quantum Phase Transition in Zero Dimensions, Phys. Rev. X5, 031028 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a Dissipative Phase Transition in a One-Dimensional Circuit QED Lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Casteels, R

    W. Casteels, R. Fazio, and C. Ciuti, Critical dynamical prop- erties of a first-order dissipative phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012128 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Soriente, T

    M. Soriente, T. Donner, R. Chitra, and O. Zilber- berg, Dissipation-induced anomalous multicritical phenom- ena, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 183603 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Hwang, P

    M.-J. Hwang, P. Rabl, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipative phase transition in the open quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A97, 013825 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    C. J. Zhu, L. L. Ping, Y. P. Yang, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed Light Induced Symmetry Breaking Superradiant Phase Tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 073602 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    M. H. Kalthoff, D. M. Kennes, A. J. Millis, and M. A. Sentef, Nonequilibrium phase transition in a driven-dissipative quan- tum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023115 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Prasad, H

    M. Prasad, H. K. Yadalam, C. Aron, and M. Kulkarni, Dissipa- tive quantum dynamics, phase transitions, and non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. A105, L050201 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Rakovszky, S

    T. Rakovszky, S. Gopalakrishnan, and C. von Keyserlingk, Defining stable phases of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041031 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Zhu, C.-S

    G.-L. Zhu, C.-S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X.-Y. L¨ u, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal superradiant phase transitions and multicriti- cality in a cavity QED system, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Abouelela, M

    A. Abouelela, M. Turaev, R. Kramer, M. Janning, M. Kajan, S. Ray, and J. Kroha, Stabilizing open photon condensates by ghost-attractor dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 053402 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Uni- versality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025004 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir `o, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Keßler, P

    H. Keßler, P. Kongkhambut, C. Georges, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, and A. Hemmerich, Observation of a dissipative time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043602 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J.G. Cosme, A. Hem- merich, and H. Kessle, Observation of a continuous time crys- tal, Science377, 670 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    X. Wu, Z. Wang, F. Yang, R. Gao, C. Liang, M.K. Tey, X. Li, T. Pohl, and L. You, Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas, Nature (London)20, 1389 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Russo and T

    F. Russo and T. Pohl, Quantum dissipative continuous time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 110404 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Grobe, F

    R. Grobe, F. Haake, and H.-J. Sommers, Quantum distinction of regular and chaotic dissipative motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1899 (1988); R. Grobe and F. Haake, Universality of cubic- level repulsion for dissipative quantum chaos,ibid.62, 2893 (1989)

    1988

  35. [35]

    Akemann, M

    G. Akemann, M. Kieburg, A. Mielke, and T. Prosen, Univer- sal signature from integrability to chaos in dissipative open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 254101 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Denisov, T

    S. Denisov, T. Laptyeva, W. Tarnowski, D. Chru´sci´nski, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Universal spectra of random Lindblad operators, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 140403 (2019). 13

    2019

  37. [37]

    L. S ´a, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Complex spacing ratios: A sig- nature of dissipative quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. X10, 021019 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Piazza and H

    F. Piazza and H. Ritsch, Self-ordered limit cycles, chaos, and phase slippage with a superfluid inside an optical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 163601 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    S. Ray, A. Vardi, and D. Cohen, Quantum signatures in quench from chaos to superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 130604 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Villase ˜nor, L

    D. Villase ˜nor, L. F. Santos, and P. Barberis-Blostein, Break- down of the quantum distinction of regular and chaotic classical dynamics in dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 240404 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Vivek, D

    G. Vivek, D. Mondal, S. Chakraborty, and S. Sinha, Self trap- ping phenomenon, multistability and chaos in open anisotropic Dicke dimer, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 113404 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Ferrari, L

    F. Ferrari, L. Gravina, D. Eeltink, P. Scarlino, V. Savona, and F. Minganti, Dissipative quantum chaos unveiled by stochastic quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013276 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Mondal, A

    D. Mondal, A. Kolovsky, and S. Sinha, Dissipative chaos and steady state of an open Tavis-Cummings dimer, Phys. Rev. E 111, L052204 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Villase ˜nor, H

    D. Villase ˜nor, H. Yan, M. Orel, and M. Robnik, Correspon- dence principle, dissipation, and Ginibre ensemble, Phys. Rev. E112, L042204 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Mondal, L

    D. Mondal, L. F. Santos, and S. Sinha, Transient and steady state chaos in dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 040401 (2026)

    2026

  46. [46]

    Ritsch, P

    H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 553 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity QED with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics, Adv. Phys.70, 1 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    V. D. Vaidya, Y. Guo, R. M. Kroeze, K. E. Ballantine, A. J. Koll´ar, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Tunable-Range, Photon Me- diated Atomic Interactions in Multimode Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. X8, 011002 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature (London)464, 1301 (2010)

    2010

  50. [50]

    Klinder, H

    J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. Wolke, L. Mathey, and A. Hem- merich, Dynamical phase transition in the open Dicke model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 3290 (2015)

    2015

  51. [51]

    M. P. Baden, K. J. Arnold, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Realization of the Dicke model using cavity assisted Raman transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 020408 (2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    S. J. Masson, M. D. Barrett, and S. Parkins, Cavity QED Engineering of Spin Dynamics and Squeezing in a Spinor Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 213601 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Zhiqiang, C

    Z. Zhiqiang, C. H. Lee, R. Kumar, K. J. Arnold, S. J. Mas- son, A. S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Nonequilibrium phase transition in a spin-1 Dicke model, Optica4, 424 (2017)

    2017

  54. [54]

    Landig, L

    R. Landig, L. Hruby, N. Dogra, M. Landini, R. Mottl, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Quantum phases from competing short- and long-range interactions in an optical lattice, Nature (London)532, 476 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    L ´eonard, A

    J. L ´eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Supersolid Formation in a Quantum Gas Breaking a Continuous Translational Symmetry, Nature (London)543, 87 (2017)

    2017

  56. [56]

    S. R. K. Rodriguez, W. Casteels, F. Storme, N. Carlon Zambon, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆıtre, A. Amo, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Probing a dissipative phase transition via dynamical optical hysteresis, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 247402 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Letscher, O

    F. Letscher, O. Thomas, T. Niederpr¨ um, M. Fleischhauer, and H. Ott, Bistability versus Metastability in Driven Dissipative Rydberg Gases, Phys. Rev. X7, 021020 (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Spinor self-ordering of a quantum gas in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163601 (2018)

    2018

  59. [59]

    Mivehvar, S

    F. Mivehvar, S. Ostermann, F. Piazza, and H. Ritsch, Driven- dissipative supersolid in a ring cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 073602 (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    Muniz, D

    J. Muniz, D. Barberena, R.J. Lewis-Swan, D.J. Young, J. R. K. Cline, A. M. Rey, and J.K. Thompson, Exploring dynamical phase transitions with cold atoms in an optical cavity, Nature (London)580, 602 (2020)

    2020

  61. [61]

    Ferri, R

    F. Ferri, R. Rosa-Medina, F. Finger, N. Dogra, M. Soriente, O. Zilberberg, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Emerging dissipative phases in a superradiant quantum gas with tunable decay, Phys. Rev. X11, 041046 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Bloch, I

    J. Bloch, I. Carusotto, and M. Wouters, Non-equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation in photonic systems, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 470 (2022)

    2022

  63. [63]

    D. J. Young, A. Chu, E. Y. Song, D. Barberena, D. Wellnitz, Z. Niu, V. M. Sch ¨afer, R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Observing dynamical phases of BCS super conductors in a cavity QED simulator, Nature (London)625, 679 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-Body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  65. [65]

    Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Nat

    I. Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 1, 23 (2005); I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb´ene, Quan- tum simulations with ultracold quantum gases Nat. Phys.8, 267 (2012)

    2005

  66. [66]

    D. S. Petrov, Quantum Mechanical Stabilization of a Collaps- ing Bose-Bose Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 155302 (2015)

    2015

  67. [67]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. B ¨ottcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature (London)539, 259 (2016)

    2016

  68. [68]

    C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Science359, 301 (2018)

    2018

  69. [69]

    Semeghini, G

    G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wolswijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and M. Fattori, Self-Bound Quantum Droplets of Atomic Mixtures in Free Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 235301 (2018)

    2018

  70. [70]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. W¨achtler, L. San- tos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-Fluctuation-Driven Crossover from a Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Macrodroplet in a Dipolar Quantum Fluid, Phys. Rev. X6, 041039 (2016)

    2016

  71. [71]

    B ¨ottcher, J.-N

    F. B ¨ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, New states of matter with fine-tuned interactions: Quantum droplets and dipolar supersolids, Rep. Prog. Phys.84, 012403 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    Z. Luo, W. Pang, B. Liu, Y. Li, and B.A. Malomed, A new kind form of liquid matter: Quantum droplets, Front. Phys.16, 32201 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakharchik, Ultradilute Low- Dimensional Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 100401 (2016)

    2016

  74. [74]

    G. E. Astrakharchik and B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of one- dimensional quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A98, 013631 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    Tylutki, G

    M. Tylutki, G. E. Astrakharchik, B. A. Malomed, and D. S. Petrov, Collective excitations of a one-dimensional quantum droplet, Phys. Rev. A101, 051601(R) (2020). 14

    2020

  76. [76]

    Karpov and F

    P. Karpov and F. Piazza, Light-induced quantum droplet phases of lattice bosons in multimode cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 103201 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    Masalaeva, H

    N. Masalaeva, H. Ritsch, and F. Mivehvar, Tuning photon- mediated interactions in a multimode cavity: From supersolid to insulating droplets hosting phononic excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 173401 (2023)

    2023

  78. [78]

    L. Mixa, M. Radonji ´c, A. Pelster, and M. Thorwart, Engineer- ing quantum droplet formation by cavity-induced long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023204 (2025)

    2025

  79. [79]

    L. Mixa, M. Radonji ´c, A. Pelster, and M. Thorwart, Cavity- induced quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033216 (2025)

    2025

  80. [80]

    Caldara, O

    M. Caldara, O. Bleu, F. M. Marchetti, J. Levinsen, and M. M. Parish, Quantum droplets of light in semiconductor microcav- ities, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 116902 (2026)

    2026

Showing first 80 references.