pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26834 · v1 · pith:4EOK76S4new · submitted 2026-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A Hybrid Quantum Mechanics Machine Learning Forcefield (QM/ML) Framework for Accurate Solute-Dislocation Interaction Simulations

Junting Zhang , Colleen Reynolds , Ryan S. Stroud , Jana Smutna , Daniel J. M. King , Andrew P. Horsfield , Mark R. Wenman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 03:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hybrid QM/MLsolute-dislocation interactionsmachine learning interatomic potentialszirconiumsteelirradiation defectsdensity functional theorysegregation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid QM/ML framework couples DFT with neural-network potentials to model solute-dislocation interactions at experimental scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a hybrid quantum-mechanics/machine-learning simulation method that links density functional theory calculations to neural-network interatomic potentials. This combination aims to deliver chemical accuracy for solute segregation at dislocations while reaching length scales that pure DFT cannot access. The authors test the approach on tin and iron segregation to dislocation loops in zirconium, where it matches experimental observations, and on magnetically complex interactions in steel.

Core claim

The QM/ML framework reproduces the experimentally observed Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr and investigates magnetically complex solute-dislocation interactions in steel, establishing the approach as a transferable, high-fidelity tool for modelling irradiation-induced defect structures.

What carries the argument

The hybrid QM/ML simulation framework that couples DFT with neural-network machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) to enable accurate atomistic dislocation simulations at reduced cost.

If this is right

  • Accurate atomistic dislocation simulations become feasible at reduced computational cost.
  • Reproduction of Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr matches experiments.
  • Investigation of solute-dislocation interactions in steel with magnetic complexity is enabled.
  • The framework serves as a transferable tool for modelling irradiation-induced defect structures.
  • It provides a route to benchmark emerging MLIPs against DFT-level accuracy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupling strategy could be applied to other irradiation-sensitive alloys to predict long-term microstructural evolution.
  • If the ML component is retrained on new DFT data, the framework might extend to dynamic processes such as dislocation loop growth under continued irradiation.
  • Failure of the hybrid model on a new solute species would point to limits in how well the ML potential captures local chemistry around defects.

Load-bearing premise

Coupling DFT with neural-network MLIPs preserves the chemical fidelity needed for predictive solute-defect calculations at the relevant length scales without introducing uncontrolled errors from the machine-learning component.

What would settle it

A calculation in which the QM/ML predicted segregation energies for Sn or Fe at Zr dislocation loops differ substantially from both pure DFT results on smaller cells and from measured segregation profiles.

read the original abstract

Solute-dislocation interactions play a central role in controlling microstructural evolution and mechanical behaviour of structural materials, yet conventional atomistic modelling approaches struggle to combine the chemical accuracy with computational scalability. In the nuclear industry, these challenges become particularly acute, as experiments reveal strong correlations between solute segregation and irradiation-induced dislocation loops. However, theoretical insight remains limited because density functional theory (DFT) simulations are prohibitively expensive at relevant length scales, while traditional semi-empirical interatomic potentials lack the chemical fidelity required for predictive solute-defect calculations. Here, we introduce a hybrid quantum-mechanics/machine-learning (QM/ML) simulation framework that couples DFT with neural-network machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs), enabling accurate atomistic dislocation simulations at reduced computational cost. We demonstrate the QM/ML framework's capability by reproducing the experimentally observed Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr and investigating magnetically complex solute-dislocation interactions in steel. These results establish the approach as a transferable, high-fidelity tool for modelling irradiation-induced defect structures and benchmarking emerging MLIPs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a hybrid quantum-mechanics/machine-learning (QM/ML) simulation framework that couples density functional theory (DFT) with neural-network machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) to enable accurate atomistic dislocation simulations at reduced computational cost. It claims to reproduce the experimentally observed Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr and to investigate magnetically complex solute-dislocation interactions in steel, establishing the approach as a transferable, high-fidelity tool for modelling irradiation-induced defect structures.

Significance. If the central claims hold with proper validation, the framework would offer a meaningful advance for nuclear materials modeling by combining DFT-level chemical accuracy with the length scales needed for dislocation and solute segregation studies, addressing a documented gap between experiment and conventional atomistic methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the QM/ML framework reproduces experimentally observed Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr is asserted without any accompanying methods details, validation metrics, error bars, training data description, or comparison to experiment, preventing assessment of whether the data support the claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the framework investigates magnetically complex solute-dislocation interactions in steel and establishes transferability likewise lacks any reported training protocols, MLIP error metrics, or cross-validation against pure DFT or experiment, leaving the weakest assumption (that DFT-MLIP coupling preserves chemical fidelity without uncontrolled errors) untestable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review. The abstract is intended as a high-level summary, with full methodological details, validation metrics, training protocols, error bars, and comparisons to DFT/experiment provided in the manuscript body. We address the specific concerns below and will revise the abstract for improved clarity and assessability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the QM/ML framework reproduces experimentally observed Sn and Fe segregation to dislocation loops in Zr is asserted without any accompanying methods details, validation metrics, error bars, training data description, or comparison to experiment, preventing assessment of whether the data support the claim.

    Authors: We agree the abstract as written is too terse on this point. The full manuscript details the QM/ML coupling protocol, DFT training data for Zr-Sn/Fe solute-dislocation configurations, MLIP force/energy RMSE validation metrics, statistical error bars from ensemble runs, and quantitative comparison to experimental segregation observations (see Methods and Results sections). To address the concern directly, we will revise the abstract to include a concise statement on the validation approach and key accuracy metrics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the framework investigates magnetically complex solute-dislocation interactions in steel and establishes transferability likewise lacks any reported training protocols, MLIP error metrics, or cross-validation against pure DFT or experiment, leaving the weakest assumption (that DFT-MLIP coupling preserves chemical fidelity without uncontrolled errors) untestable.

    Authors: The manuscript contains the requested information: training protocols for the magnetic steel systems, MLIP error metrics versus DFT benchmarks, and cross-validation results confirming chemical fidelity is preserved within controlled error bounds (detailed in the steel case study). The abstract summarizes rather than reports these. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference the validation and transferability tests performed, making the claims more directly assessable from the summary. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe the introduction of a hybrid QM/ML coupling framework as a new simulation tool, with demonstrations of reproducing observed segregation behaviors. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the text. The central claim is the development of a transferable modeling approach rather than any result that reduces by construction to its own inputs, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described or extractable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5745 in / 986 out tokens · 44058 ms · 2026-06-26T03:31:57.460769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Department of Materials and Centre for Nuclear Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

  2. [2]

    h” and “l

    Department of Materials and Thomas Young Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK Corresponding author: Mark R. Wenman Corresponding author email: m.wenman@imperial.ac.uk Abstract: Solute–dislocation interactions play a central role in controlling microstructural evolution and mechanical behaviour of structural materials, yet conventional atomistic mod...

  3. [3]

    We have developed a neural network MLIP based force convergence hybrid QM/ML framework specifically for dislocation studies. By combining the accuracy of DFT with the efficiency of modern MLIPs, the method reduces the required DFT dislocations calculations from many thousands of atoms to only a few hundred, thereby significantly lowering computational cost

  4. [4]

    We demonstrate the necessary benchmarking procedures for the multiregion disk model and show that the QM/ML approach corrects MLIP only predictions of solute–dislocation binding energies. The inclusion of a DFT core also recovers the electronic-structure information that is absent in pure MLIP simulations, providing a more fundamental atomistic understand...

  5. [5]

    When combined with standard validation tests, this makes the origin of MLIP inaccuracies and the areas requiring further refinement much clearer

    The QM/ML framework can be used to quantify and visualise sources of error in MLIP defect simulations and offers practical guidance for benchmarking and improving fine-tuned potentials. When combined with standard validation tests, this makes the origin of MLIP inaccuracies and the areas requiring further refinement much clearer

  6. [6]

    This 15 demonstrates the capability of the framework to capture realistic solute–dislocation interaction mechanisms in irradiated alloys

    For Zr systems, the sample results reproduce experimentally observed trends, including strong segregation of Fe to dislocation cores and the anticorrelated Sn segregation relative to Fe. This 15 demonstrates the capability of the framework to capture realistic solute–dislocation interaction mechanisms in irradiated alloys. Method Computational details The...

    work page doi:10.14469/hpc/2232

  7. [7]

    J. P. Hirth and J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1982

    1982

  8. [8]

    Koutský and J

    J. Koutský and J. Kocík, Radiation Damage of Structural Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2014

    2014

  9. [9]

    A review of microstructure evolution in zirconium alloys during irradiation,

    M. Griffiths, “A review of microstructure evolution in zirconium alloys during irradiation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 159, pp. 190–218, Oct. 1988. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(88)90093-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(88)90093-1 1988

  10. [10]

    Solute – 〈111〉 interstitial loop interaction in α -FE: A DFT study,

    C. Domain and C. S. Becquart, “Solute – 〈111〉 interstitial loop interaction in α -FE: A DFT study,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 499, pp. 582 –594, Feb. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.070 2018

  11. [11]

    Cr segregation on dislocation loops enhances hardening in ferritic Fe –Cr Alloys,

    D. Terentyev, F. Bergner, and Y. Osetsky, “Cr segregation on dislocation loops enhances hardening in ferritic Fe –Cr Alloys,” Acta Materialia, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1444 –1453, Mar. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.021 2013

  12. [12]

    The stability of alloying additions in zirconium,

    S. C. Lumley et al., “The stability of alloying additions in zirconium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 437, no. 1–3, pp. 122–129, Jun. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.335

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.335 2013

  13. [13]

    Hydrogen solubility in zirconium intermetallic second phase particles,

    P. A. Burr, S. T. Murphy, S. C. Lumley, M. R. Wenman, and R. W. Grimes, “Hydrogen solubility in zirconium intermetallic second phase particles,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 443, no. 1 – 3, pp. 502–506, Nov. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.060 2013

  14. [14]

    Precipitates in zircaloy: Identification and the effects of irradiation and thermal treatment,

    W. J. S. Yang, R. P. Tucker, B. Cheng, and R. B. Adamson, “Precipitates in zircaloy: Identification and the effects of irradiation and thermal treatment,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 138, no. 2– 3, pp. 185–195, Apr. 1986. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(86)90005-x

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(86)90005-x 1986

  15. [15]

    Phase instability, decomposition and redistribution of intermetallic precipitates in zircaloy-2 and -4 during neutron irradiation,

    M. Griffiths, R. W. Gilbert, and G. J. C. Carpenter, “Phase instability, decomposition and redistribution of intermetallic precipitates in zircaloy-2 and -4 during neutron irradiation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 53–66, Sep. 1987. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(87)90093-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(87)90093-6 1987

  16. [16]

    Interactions between fuel pins and assembly components,

    D. O. Pickman, “Interactions between fuel pins and assembly components,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125–140, Sep. 1975. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(75)90018-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5493(75)90018-7 1975

  17. [17]

    Microstructural aspects of accelerated deformation of Zircaloy nuclear reactor components during service,

    M. Griffiths, R. A. Holt, and A. Rogerson, “Microstructural aspects of accelerated deformation of Zircaloy nuclear reactor components during service,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 225, pp. 245–258, Aug. 1995. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(94)00687-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(94)00687-3 1995

  18. [18]

    〈c〉 component dislocations in annealed zircaloy irradiated at about 570 K,

    R. A. Holt and R. W. Gilbert, “ 〈c〉 component dislocations in annealed zircaloy irradiated at about 570 K,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 185 –189, Feb. 1986. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(86)90218-7 19

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(86)90218-7 1986

  19. [19]

    Influence of neutron irradiation on dislocation structure and phase composition of Zr-Base Alloys,

    V. Shishov et al., “Influence of neutron irradiation on dislocation structure and phase composition of Zr-Base Alloys,” Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium, pp. 603–622, Jan. 1996. doi:10.1520/stp16192s

    work page doi:10.1520/stp16192s 1996

  20. [20]

    Experimental and modeling approach of irradiation defects recovery in zirconium alloys: Impact of an applied stress,

    J. Ribis et al., “Experimental and modeling approach of irradiation defects recovery in zirconium alloys: Impact of an applied stress,” Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 15th International Symposium, pp. 674–695, Jan. 2009. doi:10.1520/stp48162s

    work page doi:10.1520/stp48162s 2009

  21. [21]

    Irradiation damages of structural materials under different irradiation environments,

    E. Wakai et al., “Irradiation damages of structural materials under different irradiation environments,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 543, p. 152503, Jan. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152503

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152503 2021

  22. [22]

    Radiation-induced segregation,

    M. Nastar and F. Soisson, “Radiation-induced segregation,” Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, pp. 471–496, 2012. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-056033-5.00035-5

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-056033-5.00035-5 2012

  23. [23]

    Irradiation growth of zirconium — plutonium alloys,

    J. A. Horak and H. V. Rhude, “Irradiation growth of zirconium — plutonium alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 111–112, Jan. 1961. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(61)90185-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(61)90185-4 1961

  24. [24]

    First -principles calculations of solute transport in zirconium: Vacancy-mediated diffusion with metastable states and interstitial diffusion,

    A. C. Jain, P. A. Burr, and D. R. Trinkle, “First -principles calculations of solute transport in zirconium: Vacancy-mediated diffusion with metastable states and interstitial diffusion,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 3, no. 3, Mar. 2019. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.033402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.033402 2019

  25. [25]

    Behavior and properties of Zircaloys in power reactors: A short review of pertinent aspects in LWR Fuel,

    F. Garzarolli, H. Stehle, and E. Steinberg, “Behavior and properties of Zircaloys in power reactors: A short review of pertinent aspects in LWR Fuel,” Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium, pp. 12–32, Jan. 1996. doi:10.1520/stp16165s

    work page doi:10.1520/stp16165s 1996

  26. [26]

    H. G. Rickover, L. D. Geiger, and B. Lustman, History of the development of zirconium alloys for use in nuclear reactors, Mar. 1975. doi:10.2172/4240391

    work page doi:10.2172/4240391 1975

  27. [27]

    Contribution of dislocation loop to radiation -hardening of RPV steels studied by STEM/EDS with surveillance test pieces,

    T. Fujita, J. Hirabayashi, Y. Katayama, F. Kano, and H. Watanabe, “Contribution of dislocation loop to radiation -hardening of RPV steels studied by STEM/EDS with surveillance test pieces,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 572, p. 154055, Dec. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154055 2022

  28. [28]

    Effects of P on formation and growth of Mn -Ni-Si clusters in low -cu reactor pressure vessel steel analyzed by Atom Probe Tomography,

    K. Inoue et al., “Effects of P on formation and growth of Mn -Ni-Si clusters in low -cu reactor pressure vessel steel analyzed by Atom Probe Tomography,” Acta Materialia, vol. 296, p. 121303, Sep. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121303

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121303 2025

  29. [29]

    Yuan et al., In -situ S/TEM investigations of deformation and damage mechanism of neutron - irradiated eurofer97, 2024

    Q. Yuan et al., In -situ S/TEM investigations of deformation and damage mechanism of neutron - irradiated eurofer97, 2024. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4812461

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4812461 2024

  30. [30]

    Irradiation growth of zirconium single crystals: A Review,

    G. J. C. Carpenter, R. H. Zee, and A. Rogerson, “Irradiation growth of zirconium single crystals: A Review,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 159, pp. 86 –100, Oct. 1988. doi:10.1016/0022 - 3115(88)90087-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0022 1988

  31. [31]

    The effect of matrix chemistry on dislocation evolution in an irradiated Zr Alloy,

    A. Harte et al., “The effect of matrix chemistry on dislocation evolution in an irradiated Zr Alloy,” Acta Materialia, vol. 130, pp. 69–82, May 2017. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.024 2017

  32. [32]

    Mayweg et al., Formation of pure zirconium islands inside C-component loops in high-burnup fuel cladding, 2024

    D. Mayweg et al., Formation of pure zirconium islands inside C-component loops in high-burnup fuel cladding, 2024. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4754309

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4754309 2024

  33. [33]

    Redistribution of alloying elements in zircaloy -2 after in -reactor exposure,

    G. Sundell et al., “Redistribution of alloying elements in zircaloy -2 after in -reactor exposure,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 454, no. 1 –3, pp. 178 –185, Nov. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.07.072

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.07.072 2014

  34. [34]

    Evolution of nanoscopic iron clusters in irradiated zirconium alloys with different iron contents,

    T. Sawabe and T. Sonoda, “Evolution of nanoscopic iron clusters in irradiated zirconium alloys with different iron contents,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1110–1118, May 2018. doi:10.1080/00223131.2018.1479987

    work page doi:10.1080/00223131.2018.1479987 2018

  35. [35]

    An atom probe tomography study of the chemistry of radiation-induced dislocation loops in zircaloy-2 exposed to boiling water reactor operation,

    J. Eriksson, G. Sundell, P. Tejland, H.-O. Andrén, and M. Thuvander, “An atom probe tomography study of the chemistry of radiation-induced dislocation loops in zircaloy-2 exposed to boiling water reactor operation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 550, p. 152923, Jul. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152923

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152923 2021

  36. [36]

    APT and TEM study of behaviour of alloying elements in neutron-irradiated zirconium-based alloys,

    B. M. Jenkins, J. Haley, M. P. Moody, J. M. Hyde, and C. R. M. Grovenor, “APT and TEM study of behaviour of alloying elements in neutron-irradiated zirconium-based alloys,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 208, p. 114323, Feb. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114323 20

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114323 2022

  37. [37]

    Density functional theory simulation study of FE solutes in HCP zirconium: Magnetic and electronic properties,

    J. Zhang, A. Horsfield, and M. Wenman, “Density functional theory simulation study of FE solutes in HCP zirconium: Magnetic and electronic properties,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 609, p. 155755, May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.155755

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.155755 2025

  38. [38]

    Prediction of dislocation cores in aluminum from density functional theory,

    C. Woodward, D. R. Trinkle, L. G. Hector, and D. L. Olmsted, “Prediction of dislocation cores in aluminum from density functional theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 4, Jan. 2008. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.045507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.045507 2008

  39. [39]

    An atomistic modelling study of the properties of dislocation loops in zirconium,

    R. Hulse and C. P. Race, “An atomistic modelling study of the properties of dislocation loops in zirconium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 546, p. 152752, Apr. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152752

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152752 2021

  40. [40]

    Interaction between interstitial carbon atoms and a 1/2 〈111〉 self-interstitial atoms loop in an iron matrix: A combined DFT, off lattice KMC and MD study,

    R. Candela, N. Mousseau, R. G. Veiga, C. Domain, and C. S. Becquart, “Interaction between interstitial carbon atoms and a 1/2 〈111〉 self-interstitial atoms loop in an iron matrix: A combined DFT, off lattice KMC and MD study,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 30, no. 33, p. 335901, Jul. 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aad25d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aad25d 2018

  41. [41]

    Hydrogen and vacancy clustering in zirconium,

    C. Varvenne, O. Mackain, L. Proville, and E. Clouet, “Hydrogen and vacancy clustering in zirconium,” Acta Materialia, vol. 102, pp. 56–69, Jan. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.019 2016

  42. [42]

    Jones, Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future, Reviews of Modern Physics 87 (2015) 897–923

    R. O. Jones, “Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 897–923, Aug. 2015. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.897

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.897 2015

  43. [43]

    The effect of local chemical environment on the Energetics of stacking faults and vacancy platelets in α-Zirconium,

    J. F. March-Rico, G. Huang, and B. D. Wirth, “The effect of local chemical environment on the Energetics of stacking faults and vacancy platelets in α-Zirconium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 540, p. 152339, Nov. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152339

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152339 2020

  44. [44]

    Stress states and point defect capture radii of dislocation a - loops and C -loops in alpha -zirconium,

    J. F. March -Rico and B. D. Wirth, “Stress states and point defect capture radii of dislocation a - loops and C -loops in alpha -zirconium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 587, p. 154752, Dec

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154752

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154752 2023

  46. [46]

    Strain fields and line energies of dislocations in uranium dioxide,

    D. C. Parfitt, C. L. Bishop, M. R. Wenman, and R. W. Grimes, “Strain fields and line energies of dislocations in uranium dioxide,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 22, no. 17, p. 175004, Apr. 2010. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/17/175004

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/17/175004 2010

  47. [47]

    Molecular statics calculations of the biases and point defect capture volumes of small cavities,

    A. A. Kohnert, M. A. Cusentino, and B. D. Wirth, “Molecular statics calculations of the biases and point defect capture volumes of small cavities,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 499, pp. 480 – 489, Feb. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.005 2018

  48. [48]

    Stability of vacancy and interstitial dislocation loops in α -zirconium: Atomistic calculations and continuum modelling,

    C. Dai et al., “Stability of vacancy and interstitial dislocation loops in α -zirconium: Atomistic calculations and continuum modelling,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 554, p. 153059, Oct

  49. [49]

    doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153059

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153059 2021

  50. [50]

    Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals,

    M. S. Daw and M. I. Baskes, “Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals,” Physical Review B, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6443 –6453, Jun

  51. [51]

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.29.6443

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.29.6443

  52. [52]

    Neural network potential for dislocation plasticity in Ceramics,

    S. Zhang, Y. Li, S. Suzuki, A. Nakamura, and S. Ogata, “Neural network potential for dislocation plasticity in Ceramics,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 10, no. 1, Nov. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01456-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01456-7 2024

  53. [53]

    Construction of machine -learning ZR interatomic potentials for identifying the formation process of C -type dislocation loops,

    T. Okita et al., “Construction of machine -learning ZR interatomic potentials for identifying the formation process of C -type dislocation loops,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 202, p. 110865, Feb. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110865

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110865 2022

  54. [54]

    Automated atomistic simulations of dissociated dislocations with ab initio accuracy,

    L. Mismetti and M. Hodapp, “Automated atomistic simulations of dissociated dislocations with ab initio accuracy,” Physical Review B, vol. 109, no. 9, Mar. 2024. doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.094120

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.094120 2024

  55. [55]

    Machine -learning interatomic potential for radiation damage and defects in Tungsten,

    J. Byggmästar, A. Hamedani, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, “Machine -learning interatomic potential for radiation damage and defects in Tungsten,” Physical Review B, vol. 100, no. 14, Oct

  56. [56]

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.144105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.144105

  57. [57]

    Fan et al., General-purpose machine-learned potential for 16 elemental metals and their alloys, Dec

    Z. Fan et al., General-purpose machine-learned potential for 16 elemental metals and their alloys, Dec. 2023. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3612294/v1 21

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3612294/v1 2023

  58. [58]

    Efficiency, accuracy, and transferability of machine learning potentials: Application to dislocations and cracks in iron,

    L. Zhang, G. Csányi, E. van der Giessen, and F. Maresca, “Efficiency, accuracy, and transferability of machine learning potentials: Application to dislocations and cracks in iron,” Acta Materialia, vol. 270, p. 119788, May 2024. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119788

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119788 2024

  59. [59]

    Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials,

    R. Drautz, “Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials,” Physical Review B, vol. 99, no. 1, Jan. 2019. doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.014104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.014104 2019

  60. [60]

    MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fields,

    I. Batatia, D. P. Kovács, G. N. C. Simm, C. Ortner, and G. Csányi, “MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fields,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07697, Jun. 2022. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.07697

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07697 2022

  61. [61]

    Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small -scale models and realistic device -scale simulations,

    G. Wang et al., “Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small -scale models and realistic device -scale simulations,” iScience, vol. 27, no. 5, p. 109673, May 2024. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109673

    work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109673 2024

  62. [62]

    A machine learning potential for simulation the dislocation behavior of magnesium,

    J. Kan et al., “A machine learning potential for simulation the dislocation behavior of magnesium,” Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, Nov. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2024.11.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jma.2024.11.009 2024

  63. [63]

    QM/MM study of dislocation —hydrogen/helium interactions in α -FE,

    Y. Zhao and G. Lu, “QM/MM study of dislocation —hydrogen/helium interactions in α -FE,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 065004, Jul

  64. [64]

    doi:10.1088/0965-0393/19/6/065004

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/19/6/065004

  65. [65]

    Hybrid Quantum/classical study of hydrogen- decorated screw dislocations in tungsten: Ultrafast pipe diffusion, core reconstruction, and effects on glide mechanism,

    P. Grigorev, T. D. Swinburne, and J. R. Kermode, “Hybrid Quantum/classical study of hydrogen- decorated screw dislocations in tungsten: Ultrafast pipe diffusion, core reconstruction, and effects on glide mechanism,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 4, no. 2, Feb. 2020. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.023601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.023601 2020

  66. [66]

    Computing energy barriers for rare events from hybrid quantum/classical simulations through the virtual work principle,

    T. D. Swinburne and J. R. Kermode, “Computing energy barriers for rare events from hybrid quantum/classical simulations through the virtual work principle,” Physical Review B, vol. 96, no. 14, Oct. 2017. doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.144102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.144102 2017

  67. [67]

    Avoiding electron spill- out in QM/mm calculations on excited states with simple pseudopotentials,

    A. Marefat Khah, P. Reinholdt, J. M. Olsen, J. Kongsted, and C. Hättig, “Avoiding electron spill- out in QM/mm calculations on excited states with simple pseudopotentials,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1373–1381, Feb. 2020. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01162

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01162 2020

  68. [68]

    How accurate are QM/MM models?,

    J. Ho, H. Yu, Y. Shao, M. Taylor, and J. Chen, “How accurate are QM/MM models?,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1517–1528, Dec. 2024. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06521

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06521 2024

  69. [69]

    Calculation of dislocation binding to helium -vacancy defects in tungsten using hybrid ab initio -machine learning methods,

    P. Grigorev, A. M. Goryaeva, M.-C. Marinica, J. R. Kermode, and T. D. Swinburne, “Calculation of dislocation binding to helium -vacancy defects in tungsten using hybrid ab initio -machine learning methods,” Acta Materialia, vol. 247, p. 118734, Apr. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118734

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118734 2023

  70. [70]

    The potential for machine learning in hybrid QM/mm calculations,

    Y.-J. Zhang, A. Khorshidi, G. Kastlunger, and A. A. Peterson, “The potential for machine learning in hybrid QM/mm calculations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 148, no. 24, Jun. 2018. doi:10.1063/1.5029879

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5029879 2018

  71. [71]

    ab‐initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density‐functional theory and beyond,

    J. Hafner, “ab‐initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density‐functional theory and beyond,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2044–2078, 2008

    2044

  72. [72]

    Efficiency of AB -initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficiency of AB -initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–50, 1996

    1996

  73. [73]

    From Ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented -wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From Ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented -wave method,” Physical Review B, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1758–1775, 1999

    1999

  74. [74]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 18, pp. 3865–3868, 1996

    1996

  75. [75]

    Methfessel, A.T

    M. Methfessel, A.T. Paxton, High -precision sampling for Brillouin -zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B. 40 (1989) 3616–3621

    1989

  76. [76]

    doi:10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e , year =

    A. Hjorth Larsen et al., “The atomic simulation environment —a python library for working with atoms,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 29, no. 27, p. 273002, Jun. 2017. doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa680e 22

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa680e 2017

  77. [77]

    Structural relaxation made simple,

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. Gähler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, “Structural relaxation made simple,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 17, Oct. 2006. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170201 2006

  78. [78]

    Neuroevolution machine learning potentials: Combining high accuracy and low cost in atomistic simulations and application to heat transport,

    Z. Fan et al., “Neuroevolution machine learning potentials: Combining high accuracy and low cost in atomistic simulations and application to heat transport,” Physical Review B, vol. 104, no. 10, Sep. 2021. doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.104309

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.104309 2021

  79. [79]

    Xu et al., NEP89: Universal neuroevolution potential for inorganic and organic materials across 89 elements, Aug

    J. Xu et al., NEP89: Universal neuroevolution potential for inorganic and organic materials across 89 elements, Aug. 2025. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7058411/v1

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7058411/v1 2025

  80. [80]

    GPUMD: A package for constructing accurate machine -learned potentials and performing highly efficient atomistic simulations,

    Z. Fan et al., “GPUMD: A package for constructing accurate machine -learned potentials and performing highly efficient atomistic simulations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 157, no. 11, Sep. 2022. doi:10.1063/5.0106617

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0106617 2022

Showing first 80 references.