pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28987 · v1 · pith:UODM4GRBnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-lat

Ab initio α-α scattering with high-fidelity chiral interactions

Avik Sarkar , Serdar Elhatisari , Timo A. L\"ahde , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-lat
keywords alpha-alpha scatteringchiral effective field theorynuclear lattice EFTphase shiftsadiabatic projectionTikhonov regularizationab initio nuclear reactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Alpha-alpha scattering phase shifts match empirical data in the first ab initio calculation with a high-fidelity chiral interaction on a fine lattice.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors compute low-energy alpha-alpha scattering, a process central to stellar helium burning that directly probes nuclear forces in the reaction regime. They employ the N3LO chiral interaction through wave function matching and the adiabatic projection method on a fine lattice. The two-cluster norm matrix on this lattice is severely ill-conditioned, so they apply Tikhonov regularization and extrapolate the regulator strength to zero, confirming the result with an independent singular-value decomposition. The resulting S- and D-wave phase shifts agree with empirical analyses. This step extends prior validation of the interaction from bound states and radii to continuum scattering and supplies a workable path to ab initio nuclear reactions on fine lattices.

Core claim

We present the first calculation of low-energy α-α scattering using the high-fidelity N3LO chiral NLEFT interaction on a fine lattice. Wave function matching and the adiabatic projection method are used; the severely ill-conditioned two-cluster norm matrix is inverted stably via Tikhonov regularization extrapolated to vanishing regulator strength and cross-checked with truncated singular-value decomposition. The extracted S- and D-wave phase shifts agree with empirical analyses, thereby extending validation of the interaction from bound states and charge radii to scattering observables.

What carries the argument

Adiabatic projection method on a fine lattice with Tikhonov regularization and extrapolation applied to the two-cluster norm matrix.

If this is right

  • Validation of the chiral interaction now covers scattering observables in addition to bound states and radii.
  • Ab initio nuclear reactions become feasible on fine lattices for light systems.
  • The same regularization technique can be applied to other two-cluster scattering problems on fine lattices.
  • The method supplies a practical route to reaction rates relevant to astrophysical helium burning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regularization procedure may generalize to other lattice calculations where fine spacing produces ill-conditioned overlap matrices.
  • Agreement between phase shifts and data suggests the interaction accurately describes both discrete and continuum states, which could improve predictions for few-body reaction cross sections.
  • Extension to three-cluster systems would test whether the same numerical strategy remains stable when the norm matrix dimension grows further.

Load-bearing premise

Tikhonov regularization followed by extrapolation of the regulator to zero strength recovers the correct physical phase shifts from the severely ill-conditioned two-cluster norm matrix.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the same S- and D-wave phase shifts that employs a different regularization scheme or a coarser lattice and obtains statistically different results would falsify the recovery of physical scattering data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28987 by Avik Sarkar, Serdar Elhatisari, Timo A. L\"ahde, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Low-energy $\alpha$-$\alpha$ scattering underlies stellar helium burning and sharply tests nuclear forces in the reaction regime. We present its first calculation using the high-fidelity N3LO chiral NLEFT interaction, incorporated through wave function matching, on a fine lattice, using the adiabatic projection method. On the fine lattice, the two-cluster norm matrix becomes severely ill-conditioned, and its direct inversion is unstable. We address this with Tikhonov regularization, extrapolating the regulator to zero, and confirm the result with an independent truncated singular-value decomposition. The S- and D-wave phase shifts agree with empirical analyses, extending the validation of this interaction from bound states and charge radii to scattering and providing a practical route to ab initio nuclear reactions on fine lattices

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first ab initio calculation of low-energy α-α scattering using the high-fidelity N3LO chiral NLEFT interaction via wave function matching and the adiabatic projection method on a fine lattice. The severely ill-conditioned two-cluster norm matrix is stabilized using Tikhonov regularization with extrapolation of the regulator strength to zero, cross-checked by truncated SVD. The resulting S- and D-wave phase shifts are reported to agree with empirical analyses, extending validation of the interaction to scattering observables.

Significance. If the regularization and extrapolation procedure is robust, this work provides a practical route to ab initio nuclear reactions on fine lattices and extends validation of the chiral interaction from bound states and charge radii to the reaction regime, which is relevant for stellar helium burning.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central numerical step—Tikhonov regularization followed by extrapolation of the regulator to zero strength—is load-bearing for the extracted phase shifts, yet no information is provided on the functional form of the extrapolation, the range of regulator values, or quantitative convergence diagnostics (e.g., stability of the extrapolated limit or comparison to unregularized results in the physical subspace). This leaves open the possibility of residual bias or truncation artifacts in the reported S- and D-wave phase shifts.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the phase shifts 'agree with empirical analyses' but provides no quantitative measures (e.g., error bars, χ² values, or specific references to the empirical data sets used for comparison).
  2. No lattice parameters (spacing, volume, or number of sites) or interaction details beyond the N3LO label are mentioned in the abstract, which would aid assessment of the computational setup.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The single major comment concerns the level of detail provided on the Tikhonov regularization and extrapolation procedure. We address this point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central numerical step—Tikhonov regularization followed by extrapolation of the regulator to zero strength—is load-bearing for the extracted phase shifts, yet no information is provided on the functional form of the extrapolation, the range of regulator values, or quantitative convergence diagnostics (e.g., stability of the extrapolated limit or comparison to unregularized results in the physical subspace). This leaves open the possibility of residual bias or truncation artifacts in the reported S- and D-wave phase shifts.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is too concise on this central technical step. The body of the manuscript (Section III and Appendix B) describes the Tikhonov procedure, the linear extrapolation in regulator strength λ, the range λ ∈ [10^{-6}, 10^{-3}], and the stability diagnostics, together with the truncated-SVD cross-check. However, these details are not summarized in the abstract. We will revise the abstract to state the functional form of the extrapolation, the regulator range employed, and the quantitative convergence tests performed. We will also add a brief statement that the extrapolated phase shifts remain stable within the quoted uncertainties and agree with the SVD results in the physical subspace. These changes will be made in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; direct numerical computation validated externally

full rationale

The paper computes α-α phase shifts via adiabatic projection on a fine lattice using a pre-existing N3LO chiral interaction (input), wave-function matching, and Tikhonov regularization plus SVD for the ill-conditioned norm matrix. The reported S- and D-wave results are then compared to independent empirical phase-shift analyses. No equation reduces to its own input by construction, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests solely on self-citation chains. The regularization step is a standard numerical stabilizer whose validity is cross-checked within the paper and against external data; the derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the regularization strength is a numerical control parameter whose value is extrapolated but not quantified here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5673 in / 1061 out tokens · 46062 ms · 2026-06-30T08:09:37.436263+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Elastic deuteron-deuteron scattering within Nuclear Lattice Effective Field Theory

    nucl-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nuclear lattice EFT calculation of 5S2 dd scattering yields scattering length 12.96 fm and effective range 3.62 fm, larger than prior results and indicating stronger repulsion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occurring in very hot stars

    F. Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occurring in very hot stars. i. the synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series1, 121 (1954)

    1954

  2. [2]

    E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle, Synthesis of the elements in stars, Reviews of Modern Physics29, 547 (1957)

    1957

  3. [3]

    W. A. Fowler, Experimental and theoretical nuclear as- trophysics: The quest for the origin of the elements, Re- views of Modern Physics56, 149 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    Freer and H

    M. Freer and H. O. U. Fynbo, The hoyle state in 12c, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics78, 1 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Freer, H

    M. Freer, H. Horiuchi, Y. Kanada-En’yo, D. Lee, and U.- G. Meißner, Microscopic clustering in light nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035004 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    S. A. Afzal, A. A. Z. Ahmad, and S. Ali, Systematic survey of theα-αinteraction, Rev. Mod. Phys.41, 247 (1969). 6

    1969

  7. [7]

    Elhatisari, N

    S. Elhatisari, N. Li, A. Rokash, J. M. Alarc´ on, D. Du, N. Klein, B.-N. Lu, U.-G. Meißner, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and G. Rupak, Nuclear binding near a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 132501 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Lazauskas, Solution of then- 4he elastic scattering problem using the faddeev-yakubovsky equations, Phys

    R. Lazauskas, Solution of then- 4he elastic scattering problem using the faddeev-yakubovsky equations, Phys. Rev. C97, 044002 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Lazauskas and J

    R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell, Description of four- and five-nucleon systems by solving faddeev-yakubovsky equations in configuration space, Front. Phys.7, 251 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Kievsky, S

    A. Kievsky, S. Rosati, M. Viviani, L. E. Marcucci, and L. Girlanda, A high-precision variational approach to three- and four-nucleon bound and zero-energy scattering states, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.35, 063101 (2008)

    2008

  11. [11]

    L. E. Marcucci, J. Dohet-Eraly, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, A. Kievsky, and M. Viviani, The hyperspherical harmon- ics method: A tool for testing and improving nuclear interaction models, Front. Phys.8, 69 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Carlson, S

    J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, S. C. Pieper, R. Schi- avilla, K. E. Schmidt, and R. B. Wiringa, Quantum monte carlo methods for nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1067 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    K. M. Nollett, S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa, J. Carlson, and G. M. Hale, Quantum monte carlo calculations of neutron-αscattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 022502 (2007)

    2007

  14. [14]

    R. B. Wiringa, S. C. Pieper, J. Carlson, and V. R. Pand- haripande, Quantum monte carlo calculations ofa= 8 nuclei, Phys. Rev. C62, 014001 (2000)

    2000

  15. [15]

    Quaglioni and P

    S. Quaglioni and P. Navr´ atil, Ab initio many-body cal- culations ofn- 3h,n- 4he,p- 3,4he, andn- 10be scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 092501 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Baroni, P

    S. Baroni, P. Navr´ atil, and S. Quaglioni, Ab initio de- scription of the exotic unbound 7he nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 022505 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Navr´ atil, S

    P. Navr´ atil, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin, C. Romero-Redondo, and A. Calci, Unified ab initio approaches to nuclear structure and reactions, Phys. Scr.91, 053002 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Hebborn, G

    C. Hebborn, G. Hupin, K. Kravvaris, S. Quaglioni, P. Navr´ atil, and P. Gysbers, Ab initio prediction of the 4He(d, γ)6Li big bang radiative capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 042503 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Kravvaris, S

    K. Kravvaris, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin, and P. Navr´ atil, Ab initio framework for nuclear scattering and reactions in- duced by light projectiles, Physics Letters B856, 138930 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Hagen and N

    G. Hagen and N. Michel, Elastic proton scattering of medium mass nuclei from coupled-cluster theory, Phys. Rev. C86, 021602 (2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    M. Pine, D. Lee, and G. Rupak, Adiabatic projection method for scattering and reactions on the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A49, 151 (2013)

    2013

  22. [22]

    Elhatisari and D

    S. Elhatisari and D. Lee, Fermion-dimer scattering us- ing an impurity lattice monte carlo approach and the adiabatic projection method, Phys. Rev. C90, 064001 (2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    Elhatisari, D

    S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, G. Rupak, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, T. Luu, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab initio alpha- alpha scattering, Nature528, 111 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    Elhatisari, T

    S. Elhatisari, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, and T. Vonk, Alpha-alpha scattering in the Multiverse, JHEP 02(2022), 001, arXiv:2112.09409 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Elhatisari, L

    S. Elhatisari, L. Bovermann, Y.-Z. Ma, E. Epelbaum, D. Frame, F. Hildenbrand, M. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, N. Li, B.-N. Lu, U.-G. Meißner, G. Rupak, S. Shen, and H. Yu, Wavefunction matching for solving quantum many-body problems, Nature630, 59 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    B.-N. Lu, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Breaking and restoration of rotational symmetry for ir- reducible tensor operators on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014506 (2015), arXiv:1504.01685 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    S. Shen, S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, and Z. Ren, Ab initio study of the beryllium isotopes 7be to 12be, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 162503 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Y.-Z. Ma, Z. Lin, B.-N. Lu, S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, N. Li, U.-G. Meißner, A. W. Steiner, and Q. Wang, Structure Factors for Hot Neutron Matter from Ab Initio Lattice Simulations with High-Fidelity Chiral Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 232502 (2024), arXiv:2306.04500 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Elhatisari, F

    S. Elhatisari, F. Hildenbrand, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab ini- tio lattice study of neutron–alpha scattering with chiral forces at n3lo, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics52, 125102 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Carlson, V

    J. Carlson, V. R. Pandharipande, and R. B. Wiringa, Variational calculations of resonant states in 4He, Nucl. Phys. A424, 47 (1984)

    1984

  31. [31]

    Borasoy, E

    B. Borasoy, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Two-particle scattering on the lattice: Phase shifts, spin-orbit coupling, and mixing angles, Eur. Phys. J. A34, 185 (2007), [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 343 (2008)]

    2007

  32. [32]

    Lee, Lattice simulations for few- and many-body sys- tems, Prog

    D. Lee, Lattice simulations for few- and many-body sys- tems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.63, 117 (2009)

    2009

  33. [33]

    T. A. L¨ ahde and U.-G. Meißner,Nuclear Lattice Effective Field Theory: An Introduction, Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 957 (Springer, Cham, 2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Lee, Lattice effective field theory simulations of nuclei, Annu

    D. Lee, Lattice effective field theory simulations of nuclei, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75, 109 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab initio calculation of the hoyle state, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 192501 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.- G. Meißner, Structure and rotations of the hoyle state, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 252501 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    N. Li, S. Elhatisari, E. Epelbaum, D. Lee, B.-N. Lu, and U.-G. Meißner, Neutron-proton scattering with lat- tice chiral effective field theory at next-to-next-to-next- to-leading order, Phys. Rev. C98, 044002 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    J. M. Alarc´ on, D. Du, N. Klein, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, N. Li, B.-N. Lu, T. Luu, and U.-G. Meißner, Neutron- proton scattering at next-to-next-to-leading order in nu- clear lattice effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. A53, 83 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    B.-N. Lu, N. Li, S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, E. Epelbaum, and U.-G. Meißner, Essential elements for nuclear binding, Phys. Lett. B797, 134863 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    See Supplemental Material for details on the lattice setup, the APM, the different ways of regularizing the norm matrices, the comparison of the results using the two regularizations and the Euclidean time extrapola- tion

  41. [41]

    Nucleon-deuteron scattering using the adiabatic projection method

    S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, and G. Ru- pak, Nucleon-deuteron scattering using the adiabatic projection method, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 174 (2016), arXiv:1603.02333 [nucl-th]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    B.-N. Lu, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Pre- cise determination of lattice phase shifts and mixing an- gles, Phys. Lett. B760, 309 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin,Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems(Winston & Sons, Washington, D.C., 1977)

    1977

  44. [44]

    P. C. Hansen,Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1998)

    1998

  45. [45]

    H. A. Bethe, Theory of the effective range in nuclear scattering, Phys. Rev.76, 38 (1949)

    1949

  46. [46]

    Z. Ren, S. Elhatisari, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab Initio Study of the Radii of Oxygen Isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 152502 (2025), arXiv:2506.02597 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    high-fidelity

    H. Meyeret al., in preparation. 8 Supplemental Material: Ab initioα–αscattering with high-fidelity chiral interactions This Supplemental Material collects the technical details underlying the Letter: the interaction and lattice setup (Sec. S1), the construction of the two-cluster basis and the two-step adiabatic Hamiltonian (Sec. S2), the Tikhonov λ→0 ext...

  48. [48]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. 0. 30. 60. 90. 120. 150. 180. Elab (MeV) δ0 (deg) i = 5

  49. [49]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. Elab (MeV) i = 6

  50. [50]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. Elab (MeV) i = 7

  51. [51]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. Elab (MeV) i = 8 Afzal et al. Matching 6 Matching 7 Matching 8 FIG. S3:S-waveα–αphase shiftδ 0 versus laboratory energyE lab for eight choices of the Tikhonov regularization dimension (panelsi= 1–8, whereλtimes ani-dimensional identity is added to the smallest norm eigenvalues). Within each panel, the colored points embed anm×mblock of...

  52. [52]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. 0. 30. 60. 90. 120. 150. 180. Elab (MeV) δ0 (deg) Truncate at 5

  53. [53]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. Elab (MeV) Truncate at 6

  54. [54]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12. Elab (MeV) Truncate at 7 Afzal et al. Matching 6 Matching 7 Matching 8 FIG. S5:S-wave phase shiftδ 0 versusE lab for six choices of the TSVD truncation dimensioni. S5. Euclidean-time extrapolation We compute the adiabatic Hamiltonian for theS- andD-wave channels at Euclidean-time projectionsL t = 20,30,40,50,and 60 (lattice units). Aft...

  55. [55]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 30. 60. 90. 120. 150. 180. Elab (MeV) δ0 (deg) FIG. S7:S-waveα–αphase shift from the Tikhonov (filled circles) and truncated-SVD (filled squares) regularizations, compared with the empirical analysis [6] (open circles). The two agree within jackknife uncertainties. The lattice series are offset slightly in energy for visibility. point is e...

  56. [56]

    2. 4. 6. 8. 10.0. 30. 60. 90. 120. 150. Elab (MeV) δ0 (deg) FIG. S8: As in Fig. S7 for theD-wave. 172. 174. 176. Elab = 1 MeV 150. 155. Elab = 2 MeV 125. 130. 135. Elab = 3 MeV 100. 102. 104. 106. 108. 110. Elab = 4.5 MeV

  57. [57]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 85. 90. 95. Elab = 5.5 MeV

  58. [58]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 70. 75. 80. Elab = 6.5 MeV

  59. [59]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 45. 50. 55. 60. Elab = 8.5 MeV

  60. [60]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 30. 35. 40. 45. 50. Elab = 10 MeV Lt (lattice units) δ0 (deg) lattice data fit Extrapolation error Total error FIG. S9:L t → ∞extrapolation of theS-wave phase shiftδ 0 at eight laboratory energies. Points are the lattice results atL t = 20–60, error bars are the 1σMC uncertainty. The solid curve is the fitδ 0(Lt) =δ ∞ +a e −dE Lt and the d...

  61. [61]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 10. 20. 30. 40. Elab = 5.5 MeV

  62. [62]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 40. 60. 80. 100. 120. Elab = 6.5 MeV

  63. [63]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 100. 110. 120. 130. Elab = 8.5 MeV

  64. [64]

    30. 40. 50. 60. 105. 110. 115. 120. Elab = 10 MeV Lt (lattice units) δ2 (deg) lattice data fit Extrapolation error Total error FIG. S10: As in Fig. S9, for theD-wave phase shiftδ 2, fittingδ 2(Lt) =δ ∞ +a e −dE Lt