pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29187 · v1 · pith:DOGSQVQ2new · submitted 2026-06-28 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph

Revisiting identified-particle p_(T) spectra using the Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave model in a Bayesian inference framework

Z. Xie , W.Z. Li , J.Q. Tao , H. Zheng , W.C. Zhang , W. Dai , L.L. Zhu , X.Q. Liu
show 2 more authors
D.M. Zhou B.H. Sa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 02:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-ph
keywords Bayesian inferenceblast-wave modeltransverse momentum spectraheavy-ion collisionskinetic freeze-outidentified particlesAu+Au collisionsPb+Pb collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian analysis shows the blast-wave model can fit pion, kaon, and proton pT spectra simultaneously without species-dependent ranges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies Bayesian inference to the Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave model for transverse momentum spectra of identified particles in Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions. It tests whether one set of parameters can describe pions, kaons, and protons together over the full measured pT range instead of using separate fit limits per species. Results indicate this simultaneous description works up to the available data for Au+Au (~2 GeV/c) and to 3 GeV/c for Pb+Pb, with parameters staying broadly consistent with earlier conventional fits. The Bayesian approach also produces well-constrained posteriors for the kinetic freeze-out temperature, average flow velocity, and velocity profile exponent along with their correlations.

Core claim

Using Bayesian analysis of the Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave model, a simultaneous description of the pT spectra of pions, kaons, and protons is feasible without imposing the particle species-dependent pT fit ranges, for Au+Au collisions up to the available data (~2 GeV/c) and for Pb+Pb collisions up to 3 GeV/c. The extracted parameters remain broadly consistent with those obtained from conventional BGBW simultaneous fits, while the extension of the fit range leads to moderate changes in some parameters. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis yields well-constrained posterior distributions for the kinetic freeze-out temperature T_kin, the average transverse flow velocity <β_T>, and the exponent of the

What carries the argument

The Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave model in a Bayesian inference framework, which extracts and correlates the kinetic freeze-out temperature T_kin, average transverse flow velocity <β_T>, and velocity profile exponent n from pT spectra.

If this is right

  • Simultaneous fits to multiple identified-particle spectra succeed without particle-specific pT restrictions.
  • Moderate shifts occur in some extracted parameters when the fit range is extended.
  • Posterior distributions for T_kin, <β_T>, and n stay well-constrained with visible correlations.
  • The Bayesian BGBW framework can be used in future analyses to describe spectra and extract collision-system information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on additional collision systems or energies to check consistency of the extracted parameters.
  • Revealed correlations among parameters may help link the blast-wave description to hydrodynamic evolution models.
  • Removing fit-range choices could reduce one source of systematic uncertainty when comparing results across experiments.
  • Extending the same Bayesian treatment to higher-pT data or resonance contributions would test the model's robustness.

Load-bearing premise

The BGBW functional form remains an adequate description of the spectra when the fit range is extended to the full available data without additional resonance or non-equilibrium contributions.

What would settle it

No single set of BGBW parameters simultaneously reproduces the measured pion, kaon, and proton spectra across the full pT range, or the resulting posterior distributions become broad and inconsistent with the data yields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29187 by B.H. Sa, D.M. Zhou, H. Zheng, J.Q. Tao, L.L. Zhu, W.C. Zhang, W. Dai, W.Z. Li, X.Q. Liu, Z. Xie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Transverse momentum spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Transverse momentum spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Posterior distributions of the BGBW parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a Bayesian analysis of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) spectra of identified particles, i.e., pions, kaons, and protons, at midrapidity in Au+Au collisions and Pb+Pb collisions using the Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave (BGBW) model. We investigate whether it is possible to simultaneously describe the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ spectra of identified particles without imposing the particle species-dependent $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ fit ranges -- a practice that was followed in conventional blast-wave model studies to achieve reasonable simultaneous fits. Using Bayesian analysis, our results indicate that a simultaneous description of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ spectra of pions, kaons, and protons is feasible without imposing the particle species-dependent $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ fit ranges, for Au+Au collisions up to the available data ($\sim$2 GeV/c) and for Pb+Pb collisions up to 3 GeV/c. The extracted parameters remain broadly consistent with those obtained from conventional BGBW simultaneous fits, while the extension of the fit range leads to moderate changes in some parameters. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis yields well-constrained posterior distributions for the kinetic freeze-out temperature $T_{kin}$, the average transverse flow velocity $\langle \beta_{\mathrm{T}}\rangle$, and the exponent of the velocity profile $n$ and shows their correlations transparently. We suggest that the BGBW model in a Bayesian inference framework proposed can be applied in future data analyses to simultaneously describe the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ spectra of identified particles and extract the relevant information about the collision system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies Bayesian inference to the Boltzmann-Gibbs blast-wave (BGBW) model to analyze identified-particle pT spectra (pions, kaons, protons) in Au+Au and Pb+Pb collisions. It claims that simultaneous fits without species-dependent pT ranges are feasible up to the full available data (~2 GeV/c for Au+Au, 3 GeV/c for Pb+Pb), that the extracted parameters (T_kin, <β_T>, n) remain broadly consistent with conventional restricted-range fits, and that the posteriors are well-constrained with transparent correlations.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work shows that Bayesian methods can relax arbitrary species-dependent fit-range choices while still yielding usable constraints on kinetic freeze-out parameters. The explicit reporting of posterior distributions and correlations is a methodological strength that improves transparency over traditional χ² minimization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (implied by abstract statement on simultaneous description)] The headline claim that the four-parameter BGBW form simultaneously describes the spectra up to 3 GeV/c rests on the untested premise that the functional form remains adequate once the high-pT points are included. No quantitative measure of fit quality (e.g., χ²/dof, residuals, or posterior-predictive checks) for the newly added high-pT region is reported, so it is unclear whether the posterior is actually reproducing those data points or merely finding some parameter values.
  2. [Methods / Bayesian framework] The likelihood construction and prior choices are not specified in sufficient detail to verify that the reported well-constrained posteriors are data-driven rather than prior-dominated. In particular, the treatment of normalization parameters per species and any covariance between data points is not described.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Model] Notation for the velocity-profile exponent n and the average flow velocity <β_T> should be defined explicitly on first use, and the exact functional form of the BGBW spectrum (including the normalization factor) should be written out.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that parameters 'remain broadly consistent' with prior fits; a quantitative comparison (e.g., overlap of credible intervals) would strengthen this statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (implied by abstract statement on simultaneous description)] The headline claim that the four-parameter BGBW form simultaneously describes the spectra up to 3 GeV/c rests on the untested premise that the functional form remains adequate once the high-pT points are included. No quantitative measure of fit quality (e.g., χ²/dof, residuals, or posterior-predictive checks) for the newly added high-pT region is reported, so it is unclear whether the posterior is actually reproducing those data points or merely finding some parameter values.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative validation of the model in the extended pT range strengthens the central claim. Although the Bayesian posterior is obtained from the full dataset and yields parameters consistent with restricted-range fits, the revised manuscript will add posterior-predictive checks, residual distributions, and effective goodness-of-fit metrics focused on the high-pT region (above the conventional species-dependent cutoffs) to demonstrate that the BGBW form remains adequate up to the reported limits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Bayesian framework] The likelihood construction and prior choices are not specified in sufficient detail to verify that the reported well-constrained posteriors are data-driven rather than prior-dominated. In particular, the treatment of normalization parameters per species and any covariance between data points is not described.

    Authors: We accept that additional methodological detail is required for reproducibility and to confirm the data-driven character of the posteriors. The revised manuscript will expand the Bayesian framework section to specify the exact likelihood (including normalization nuisance parameters per species and their priors), the functional forms and ranges of all priors on T_kin, ⟨β_T⟩, and n, and the treatment of experimental uncertainties (diagonal covariance matrix, as is standard for these spectra). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is data-driven and self-contained

full rationale

The paper applies the standard BGBW functional form (with parameters T_kin, <β_T>, n, normalization) inside a Bayesian likelihood constructed directly from external experimental pT spectra. The central claim—that simultaneous fits remain feasible over extended pT ranges without species-dependent cuts—is a statement about posterior support against those independent data points, not a reduction of any extracted quantity to a definition or prior fit of itself. No equation equates a prediction to its own input, no self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise, and the model form is not smuggled in via the authors' prior work. The result is therefore externally falsifiable and does not collapse by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard Bayesian update with a likelihood based on the BGBW functional form and on the assumption that the chosen priors do not dominate the posterior. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • kinetic freeze-out temperature T_kin
    Fitted parameter whose posterior is reported; value not numerically stated in abstract.
  • average transverse flow velocity <beta_T>
    Fitted parameter whose posterior is reported; value not numerically stated in abstract.
  • velocity profile exponent n
    Fitted parameter whose posterior is reported; value not numerically stated in abstract.
  • Bayesian priors on T_kin, <beta_T>, n
    Chosen by authors; not specified in abstract but required for the inference.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The BGBW functional form is an adequate description of the measured spectra over the chosen pT ranges.
    Invoked when the authors state that simultaneous description is feasible without additional model components.
  • domain assumption The experimental pT spectra are statistically independent and correctly normalized for the likelihood.
    Standard assumption in any spectral fit; required for the Bayesian posterior to be meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5872 in / 1592 out tokens · 37113 ms · 2026-06-30T02:30:59.808345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Huovinen and P

    P. Huovinen and P. V. Ruuskanen, Hydrodynamic Mod- els for Heavy Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 163 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Muller and J

    B. Muller and J. L. Nagle, Results from the relativis- tic heavy ion collider, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.56, 93 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Adamset al.(STAR Collaboration), Identified particle distributions in pp and Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamset al.(STAR Collaboration), Identified particle distributions in pp and Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 112301 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR Collaboration), Systematic Measurements of Identified Particle Spectra inpp, d + Au and Au+Au Collisions from STAR, Phys. Rev. C79, 034909 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    Adamczyket al.(STAR Collaboration), Bulk Proper- ties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR Collaboration), Bulk Proper- ties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C96, 044904 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Bulk properties of the system formed inAu+Aucollisions at √sNN =14.5 GeV at the BNL STAR detector, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Bulk properties of the system formed inAu+Aucollisions at √sNN =14.5 GeV at the BNL STAR detector, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024905 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Strange hadron production in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, and 39 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Strange hadron production in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, and 39 GeV, Phys. Rev. C102, 034909 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Adamset al.(STAR Collaboration), Identified hadron spectra at large transverse momentum in p+p and d+Au collisions at √sN N = 200-GeV, Phys

    J. Adamset al.(STAR Collaboration), Identified hadron spectra at large transverse momentum in p+p and d+Au collisions at √sN N = 200-GeV, Phys. Lett. B637, 161 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR Collaboration), Strange parti- cle production in p+p collisions at √s= 200-GeV, Phys. Rev. C75, 064901 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Production of charged pions, kaons and protons at large transverse momenta in pp and Pb–Pb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B736, 196 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Adamet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Measurement of pion, kaon and proton production in proton–proton col- lisions at √s= 7 TeV, Eur

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Measurement of pion, kaon and proton production in proton–proton col- lisions at √s= 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 226 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Adamet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Pseudorapidity and transverse-momentum distributions of charged par- ticles in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Pseudorapidity and transverse-momentum distributions of charged par- ticles in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B753, 319 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    Aamodtet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Production of pions, kaons and protons inppcollisions at √s= 900 GeV with ALICE at the LHC, Eur

    K. Aamodtet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Production of pions, kaons and protons inppcollisions at √s= 900 GeV with ALICE at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1655 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Pseudorapidity densities of charged particles with transverse momentum thresholds in pp collisions at √s=5.02 and 13 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Pseudorapidity densities of charged particles with transverse momentum thresholds in pp collisions at √s=5.02 and 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D108, 072008 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Abelevet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Centrality de- pendence ofπ, K, p production in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    B. Abelevet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Centrality de- pendence ofπ, K, p production in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C88, 044910 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE Collaboration),K 0 S and Λ production in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 222301 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Production of charged pions, kaons, and (anti-)protons in Pb-Pb and inelasticppcollisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Production of charged pions, kaons, and (anti-)protons in Pb-Pb and inelasticppcollisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. C101, 044907 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Osada and G

    T. Osada and G. Wilk, Nonextensive hydrodynamics for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C77, 044903 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 78, 069903 (2008)]

    2008

  19. [19]

    Kyan and A

    K. Kyan and A. Monnai, QCD equation of state with Tsallis statistics for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054004 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Shi, Z.-Y

    J.-H. Shi, Z.-Y. Qin, J.-P. Zhang, J. Cao, Z.-F. Jiang, W.-C. Zhang, and H. Zheng, Nonextensive (3+1)- dimensional hydrodynamics for relativistic heavy-ion col- lisions, Phys. Rev. D111, 036010 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Schnedermann, J

    E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank, and U. W. Heinz, Ther- mal phenomenology of hadrons from 200-A/GeV S+S collisions, Phys. Rev. C48, 2462 (1993)

    1993

  22. [22]

    Schnedermann and U

    E. Schnedermann and U. W. Heinz, A Hydrodynamical assessment of 200-A/GeV collisions, Phys. Rev. C50, 1675 (1994)

    1994

  23. [23]

    J. Chen, J. Deng, Z. Tang, Z. Xu, and L. Yi, Nonequi- librium kinetic freeze-out properties in relativistic heavy ion collisions from energies employed at the RHIC beam energy scan to those available at the LHC, Phys. Rev. C 104, 034901 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Z. Tang, Y. Xu, L. Ruan, G. van Buren, F. Wang, and Z. Xu, Spectra and radial flow at RHIC with Tsallis statistics in a Blast-Wave description, Phys. Rev. C79, 051901 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    M. Shao, L. Yi, Z. Tang, H. Chen, C. Li, and Z. Xu, Ex- amine the species and beam-energy dependence of parti- cle spectra using Tsallis Statistics, J. Phys. G37, 085104 (2010)

    2010

  26. [26]

    Z. Tang, L. Yi, L. Ruan, M. Shao, H. Chen, C. Li, B. Mo- hanty, P. Sorensen, A. Tang, and Z. Xu, Statistical Origin of Constituent-Quark Scaling in the QGP hadronization, 9 Chin. Phys. Lett.30, 031201 (2013)

    2013

  27. [27]

    Ristea, A

    O. Ristea, A. Jipa, C. Ristea, T. Esanu, M. Calin, A. Barzu, A. Scurtu, and I. Abu-Quoad, Study of the freeze-out process in heavy ion collisions at relativistic energies, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.420, 012041 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Zheng and L

    H. Zheng and L. Zhu, Can Tsallis Distribution Fit All the Particle Spectra Produced at RHIC and LHC?, Adv. High Energy Phys.2015, 180491 (2015)

    2015

  29. [29]

    G. Che, J. Gu, W. Zhang, and H. Zheng, Identified parti- cle spectra in Pb–Pb, Xe–Xe and p–Pb collisions with the Tsallis blast-wave model, J. Phys. G48, 095103 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    J. Gu, C. Li, Q. Wang, W. Zhang, and H. Zheng, Collec- tive expansion in pp collisions using the Tsallis statistics, J. Phys. G49, 115101 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Werner, J

    K. Werner, J. Jahan, I. Karpenko, T. Pierog, M. Stefa- niak, and D. Vintache, Heavy ion collisions from √sN N of 62.4 GeV down to 7.7 GeV in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C111, 014903 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Waqas, G

    M. Waqas, G. X. Peng, M. Ajaz, A. M. Khubrani, E. A. Dawi, M. A. Khan, and A. Tawfik, Pseudorapidity de- pendence of the transverse momentum distribution of charged particles in pp collisions at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV, Results Phys.42, 105989 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    J. Tao, W. Wu, M. Wang, H. Zheng, W. Zhang, L. Zhu, and A. Bonasera, The novel scaling of Tsallis parame- ters from the transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in heavy-ion collisions, Particles5, 146 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    L.-L. Zhu, B. Wang, M. Wang, and H. Zheng, Energy and centrality dependence of light nuclei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Technol.33, 45 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    L. Zhu, H. Zheng, K. Da, H. Gong, Z. Ye, G. Liu, and R. C. Hwa, Universal energy dependence of measured temperatures for baryons produced in heavy-ion colli- sions, Phys. Rev. C107, 064907 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    L. Zhu, H. Zheng, and R. C. Hwa, Centrality and transverse-momentum dependence of hadrons in Pb+Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C104, 014902 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    L. Zhu, H. Zheng, and R. Kong, Centrality and transverse momentum dependencies of hadrons in Pb+Pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV and Xe+Xe collisions at √sN N = 5.44 TeV from a multi-phase transport model, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 205 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Zheng, L

    H. Zheng, L. Zhu, and A. Bonasera, Systematic analysis of hadron spectra in p+p collisions using Tsallis distri- butions, Phys. Rev. D92, 074009 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    C.-Y. Wong, G. Wilk, L. J. L. Cirto, and C. Tsallis, From QCD-based hard-scattering to nonextensive sta- tistical mechanical descriptions of transverse momentum spectra in high-energyppandp¯pcollisions, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114027 (2015)

    2015

  40. [40]

    R. Rath, A. Khuntia, R. Sahoo, and J. Cleymans, Event multiplicity, transverse momentum and energy depen- dence of charged particle production, and system thermo- dynamics inppcollisions at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G47, 055111 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Xu and C

    J. Xu and C. M. Ko, Chemical freeze-out in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B772, 290 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    Adareet al.(PHENIX), Spectra and ratios of identi- fied particles in Au+Au andd+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys

    A. Adareet al.(PHENIX), Spectra and ratios of identi- fied particles in Au+Au andd+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C88, 024906 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Tariq, M

    J. Tariq, M. U. Ashraf, and G. Nigmatkulov, Estima- tion of kinetic temperature and radial flow velocity us- ing identified hadrons and light (anti-)nuclei produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at energies available at BNL RHIC and CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. C110, 014903 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR), Energy dependence of pi+-, p and anti-p transverse momentum spectra for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 and 200-GeV, Phys. Lett. B 655, 104 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Multiplicity Dependence of Pion, Kaon, Proton and Lambda Produc- tion in p-Pb Collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B728, 25 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    Ghosh, S

    P. Ghosh, S. Muhuri, J. K. Nayak, and R. Varma, Indi- cation of transverse radial flow in high-multiplicity pro- ton–proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G41, 035106 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    S. Saha, R. Singh, and B. Mohanty,p T -differential radial flow in a blast-wave model, Phys. Rev. C112, 024902 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Vitiuk, D

    O. Vitiuk, D. Blaschke, B. D¨ onigus, and G. R¨ opke, Nonequilibrium phenomenology of identified particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C113, 044902 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    M¨ antysaari, H

    H. M¨ antysaari, H. Roch, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Global Bayesian analysis of J/ψphotopro- duction on proton and lead targets, Phys. Rev. D113, 014038 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Good- man, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013)

    2013