pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31014 · v1 · pith:EBN6K3A3new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Spin-Squeezing-Enhanced Charging for Quantum Dicke Batteries

Ke-Xiong Yan , Jia-Wen Yu , Yiming Yu , Jun-Hao Lin , Shuai Liu , Ye-Hong Chen , Yan Xia , Franco Nori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 00:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum batteriesDicke modelspin squeezingcharging powertransverse interactionsnonlinear torquedissipation robustness
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transverse interactions in Dicke quantum batteries can be controlled to induce spin squeezing and nonlinear torque that boost charging power and capacity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that matter-matter interactions in Dicke quantum batteries, typically viewed as obstacles, can instead be harnessed to improve charging. In the low-excitation limit these transverse couplings produce collective spin squeezing that softens critical modes and exponentially strengthens the effective light-matter coupling. At higher excitations the same couplings generate a macroscopic nonlinear torque that, when aligned properly, reduces phase-space barriers and directs the system toward faster charging trajectories. The resulting gains persist under realistic dissipation and can exceed the performance of ideal dissipation-free batteries in some regimes. The central goal is to demonstrate a design route for many-body quantum batteries that turns intrinsic interactions into a performance asset.

Core claim

In the low-excitation limit, transverse interactions induce collective spin squeezing, causing critical mode softening and an exponential enhancement of effective coupling, which significantly boosts charging power. At higher excitations, these interactions act as a macroscopic nonlinear torque. By appropriately aligning this torque, we effectively lower phase-space dynamical barriers, guiding the system along optimal rapid-charging paths. Importantly, this cooperative enhancement remains highly robust under realistic dissipation, outperforming ideal, dissipationless Dicke QBs in specific regimes.

What carries the argument

Transverse interactions repurposed to generate collective spin squeezing (low excitation) and aligned macroscopic nonlinear torque (higher excitation) within the Dicke model.

If this is right

  • Charging power receives an exponential boost from the softened mode and enhanced coupling in the low-excitation regime.
  • Alignment of the nonlinear torque steers the dynamics onto faster, lower-barrier charging trajectories.
  • The performance advantage survives realistic dissipation and can surpass ideal non-dissipative Dicke batteries in targeted parameter ranges.
  • The approach supplies a concrete blueprint for building dissipation-resistant, high-performance many-body quantum batteries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interaction-repurposing strategy could be tested in other collective spin or cavity systems where transverse couplings are tunable.
  • Experimental implementations would need precise control over the relative phase and strength of transverse terms to realize the claimed torque alignment.
  • The identified optimal paths may intersect with existing quantum optimal-control methods for accelerating state transfer in open systems.
  • Robustness against dissipation hints at possible operation in warm environments where perfect isolation is impractical.

Load-bearing premise

Transverse interactions can be controlled and aligned to produce the described spin squeezing and nonlinear torque effects without introducing competing detrimental processes.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing whether charging power exhibits exponential growth with transverse coupling strength in the low-excitation regime, or whether a dissipative battery with aligned interactions exceeds the charging speed of an ideal dissipationless reference battery.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31014 by Franco Nori, Jia-Wen Yu, Jun-Hao Lin, Ke-Xiong Yan, Shuai Liu, Yan Xia, Ye-Hong Chen, Yiming Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the extended Dicke QB. The optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: HP-regime charging dynamics. (a,b,c) Stored [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean-field charging dynamics. Panels (a,b,e,h) use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Robustness against dissipation. (a,c) Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-power Dicke quantum batteries (QBs) typically exploit collective superradiance, whereas intrinsic matter-matter interactions are conventionally considered detrimental. Here, we propose a counterintuitive paradigm: these interactions can be controlled and repurposed as a synergistic resource to enhance charging power and capacity. In the low-excitation limit, transverse interactions induce collective spin squeezing, causing critical mode softening and an exponential enhancement of effective coupling, which significantly boosts charging power. At higher excitations, these interactions act as a macroscopic nonlinear torque. By appropriately aligning this torque, we effectively lower phase-space dynamical barriers, guiding the system along optimal rapid-charging paths. Importantly, this cooperative enhancement remains highly robust under realistic dissipation, outperforming ideal, dissipationless Dicke QBs in specific regimes. Our results provide a blueprint for exploiting matter interactions to design dissipation-resistant, high-performance many-body QBs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that transverse matter-matter interactions in Dicke quantum batteries, conventionally viewed as detrimental, can be controlled and repurposed as a synergistic resource. In the low-excitation regime, these interactions induce collective spin squeezing that causes critical mode softening and an exponential boost to the effective coupling, enhancing charging power. At higher excitations, the interactions manifest as a macroscopic nonlinear torque that, when appropriately aligned, lowers phase-space dynamical barriers to enable faster charging paths. The resulting cooperative enhancement is asserted to remain robust under realistic dissipation and to outperform ideal, dissipationless Dicke quantum batteries in specific regimes.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work offers a new design paradigm for many-body quantum batteries that turns intrinsic interactions into an asset rather than a liability, with particular value in the demonstrated robustness to dissipation. This could inform practical implementations of high-power, dissipation-resistant quantum energy storage devices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model section (likely §2 or §3)] The load-bearing premise that transverse interactions can be tuned and aligned to produce spin squeezing and a synergistic nonlinear torque without introducing competing noise channels or shifting the system away from optimal paths is stated in the abstract but lacks an explicit protocol, bound, or derivation showing that the required control does not itself generate additional dissipation; this directly underpins the outperformance claim over ideal Dicke QBs.
  2. [Low-excitation analysis (likely §4)] The exponential enhancement of effective coupling via mode softening in the low-excitation limit is asserted but requires a concrete derivation or scaling relation (e.g., how the squeezing parameter enters the effective Hamiltonian or charging power) to confirm it follows from the transverse interaction term without additional assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results and figures] Quantitative comparisons to the ideal dissipationless case should be presented with explicit parameter values and error bars in the relevant figures to delineate the 'specific regimes' of outperformance.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the transverse interaction strength and the alignment angle of the nonlinear torque should be introduced consistently and defined at first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The comments highlight areas where additional detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing premise that transverse interactions can be tuned and aligned to produce spin squeezing and a synergistic nonlinear torque without introducing competing noise channels or shifting the system away from optimal paths is stated in the abstract but lacks an explicit protocol, bound, or derivation showing that the required control does not itself generate additional dissipation; this directly underpins the outperformance claim over ideal Dicke QBs.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit protocol and bounds are needed to substantiate the tuning of transverse interactions. In the revised manuscript, we add a dedicated subsection to the model section that specifies the control protocol via external driving fields, derives bounds ensuring no additional dissipation channels are introduced beyond those already modeled, and shows that the alignment does not shift the system from the identified optimal paths. This directly supports the outperformance claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The exponential enhancement of effective coupling via mode softening in the low-excitation limit is asserted but requires a concrete derivation or scaling relation (e.g., how the squeezing parameter enters the effective Hamiltonian or charging power) to confirm it follows from the transverse interaction term without additional assumptions.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. The revised low-excitation analysis section now includes a step-by-step derivation starting from the transverse interaction term, showing how it generates the collective squeezing parameter, induces critical mode softening, and enters the effective Hamiltonian. We explicitly derive the exponential scaling of the effective coupling with the squeezing parameter and the resulting enhancement in charging power, confirming it follows directly without further assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation remains self-contained from the Dicke model

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present a theoretical proposal that starts from the standard Dicke Hamiltonian, adds transverse interactions, and derives their effects on squeezing, mode softening, and torque alignment through standard many-body analysis. No equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations are shown that would reduce any claimed prediction or enhancement to an input by construction. The central claims rest on the model's dynamics rather than on renamed fits or load-bearing self-references, making the derivation independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5697 in / 1174 out tokens · 44737 ms · 2026-07-01T00:45:50.275666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Consequently, only 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑥/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 0 0.12 𝐸/𝜔𝑎 0 0.016𝐸/𝜔𝑎 0.09 0 𝐸/𝜔𝑎 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑦/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑧/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure 2

    generates no spin squeezing in either regime and purely modifies the effective detuning ∆ z. Consequently, only 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑥/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 0 0.12 𝐸/𝜔𝑎 0 0.016𝐸/𝜔𝑎 0.09 0 𝐸/𝜔𝑎 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑦/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 𝜔𝑎𝑡 𝐽𝑧/𝜔𝑎 0 10 −1 1 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure 2. HP-regime charging dynamics. (a,b,c) Stored energyE/ω a and (d,e,f) average powerP avg vs interaction strengthJ k/ω...

  2. [2]

    H. T. Quan, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E79, 041129 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013). 6

    2013

  4. [4]

    Kosloff, Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100–2128 (2013)

    R. Kosloff, Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100–2128 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Goold, M

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. d. Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 143001 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, M. Campisi, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Extractable work, the role of correlations, and asymptotic freedom in quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 047702 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Francica, F

    G. Francica, F. C. Binder, G. Guarnieri, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Quantum coherence and ergotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180603 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Kurizki and A

    G. Kurizki and A. G. Kofman,Thermodynamics and Control of Open Quantum Systems(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    K.-X. Yan, Y. Liu, Y. Xiao, J.-H. Lin, J. Song, Y.- H. Chen, F. Nori, and Y. Xia, Giant-atom quantum batteries: Lossless energy transfer via interference engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 180401 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´ eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150601 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    J. Chen, L. Zhan, L. Shao, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and X. Wang, Charging quantum batteries with a general harmonic driving field, Ann. Phys.532(2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Peng, W.-B

    L. Peng, W.-B. He, S. Chesi, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-W. Guan, Lower and upper bounds of quantum battery power in multiple central spin systems, Phys. Rev. A103, 052220 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    J. Dias, H. Wang, K. Nemoto, F. Nori, and W. J. Munro, Efficient charging of multiple open quantum batteries through dissipation and pumping, Phys. Rev. A113, 012617 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.17, 075015 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    Juli` a-Farr´ e, T

    S. Juli` a-Farr´ e, T. Salamon, A. Riera, M. N. Bera, and M. Lewenstein, Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023113 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Rossini, G

    D. Rossini, G. M. Andolina, D. Rosa, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Quantum advantage in the charging process of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236402 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Pokhrel and J

    S. Pokhrel and J. Gea-Banacloche, Large collective power enhancement in dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 130401 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  21. [21]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Phys. Rep. 93, 301–396 (1982)

    1982

  22. [22]

    Garziano, A

    L. Garziano, A. Settineri, O. Di Stefano, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Gauge invariance of the Dicke and Hopfield models, Phys. Rev. A102, 023718 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Brange, N

    F. Brange, N. Lambert, F. Nori, and C. Flindt, Lee-Yang theory of the superradiant phase transition in the open Dicke model, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033181 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Yang, F.-M

    D.-L. Yang, F.-M. Yang, and F.-Q. Dou, Three-level Dicke quantum battery, Phys. Rev. B109, 235432 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Crescente, M

    A. Crescente, M. Carrega, M. Sassetti, and D. Ferraro, Ultrafast charging in a two-photon Dicke quantum battery, Phys. Rev. B102, 245407 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Delmonte, A

    A. Delmonte, A. Crescente, M. Carrega, D. Ferraro, and M. Sassetti, Characterization of a two-photon quantum battery: Initial conditions, stability and work extraction, Entropy23, 612 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    J. P. Mendon¸ ca, K. Jachymski, and Y. Wang, Role of matter interactions in superradiant phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 133601 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    S. J. Roof, K. J. Kemp, M. D. Havey, and I. M. Sokolov, Observation of single-photon superradiance and the cooperative Lamb shift in an extended sample of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 073003 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    B. M. Garraway, The Dicke model in quantum optics: Dicke model revisited, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A369, 1137–1155 (2011)

    2011

  30. [30]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev.6 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, J. Keeling, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an organic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery, Sci. Adv.8, 10.1126/sciadv.abk3160 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk3160 2022

  32. [32]

    Dou, Y.-Q

    F.-Q. Dou, Y.-Q. Lu, Y.-J. Wang, and J.-A. Sun, Extended Dicke quantum battery with interatomic interactions and driving field, Phys. Rev. B105, 115405 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. Wang, C. Wu, and G. Wang, Quantum battery based on dipole-dipole interaction and external driving field, Phys. Rev. E107, 054125 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    1993

  35. [35]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, A. Chu, C. Maruko, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Hamiltonian engineering of collective XYZ spin models in an optical cavity, Nat. Phys.21, 916–923 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    D. C. Mattis, Ferromagnetism and spin waves in the band theory, Phys. Rev.132, 2521 (1963)

    1963

  37. [37]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol.2(2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Akbari, W

    K. Akbari, W. Salmon, F. Nori, and S. Hughes, Generalized dicke model and gauge-invariant master equations for two atoms in ultrastrongly-coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033002 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    J. Ma, X. G. Wang, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeezing, Phys. Rep.509, 89–165 (2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    1997

  41. [41]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    2003

  42. [42]

    G. S. Agarwal,Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, 2012). 7 [42]https://link.aps.org/supplemental/XXXXXXX, see Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation and possible experimiental implementation

    2012

  43. [43]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  44. [44]

    Wang and B

    X. Wang and B. C. Sanders, Relations between bosonic quadrature squeezing and atomic spin squeezing, Phys. Rev. A68, 033821 (2003)

    2003

  45. [45]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P.-B. Li, X.-Y. L¨ u, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Exponentially enhanced light- matter interaction, cooperativities, and steady-state entanglement using parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 093601 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    W. Qin, A. F. Kockum, C. S. Mu˜ noz, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter, Phys. Rep. 1078, 1–59 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    G. M. Andolina, D. Farina, A. Mari, V. Pellegrini, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Charger-mediated energy transfer in exactly solvable models for quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. B98, 205423 (2018)

    2018

  48. [48]

    Ashhab, J

    S. Ashhab, J. R. Johansson, and F. Nori, Rabi oscillations in a qubit coupled to a quantum two-level system, New J. Phys.8, 103–103 (2006)

    2006

  49. [49]

    A. N. Omelyanchouk, S. N. Shevchenko, A. M. Zagoskin, E. Il’ichev, and F. Nori, Pseudo-Rabi oscillations in superconducting flux qubits in the classical regime, Phys. Rev. B78, 054512 (2008)

    2008

  50. [50]

    A. N. Omelyanchouk, S. Savel’ev, A. M. Zagoskin, E. Il’ichev, and F. Nori, Noise-induced quantum coherence and persistent Rabi oscillations in a Josephson flux qubit, Phys. Rev. B80, 212503 (2009)

    2009

  51. [51]

    Garziano, R

    L. Garziano, R. Stassi, V. Macr` ı, A. F. Kockum, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Multiphoton quantum Rabi oscillations in ultrastrong cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A92, 063830 (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for the quantum Rabi model: Efficient generation of giant entangled cat states via parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 023602 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Chen, Z.-C

    Y.-H. Chen, Z.-C. Shi, F. Nori, and Y. Xia, Error-tolerant amplification and simulation of the ultrastrong-coupling quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 033603 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Atomic coherent states in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972)

    1972

  55. [55]

    C.-K. Hu, J. Qiu, P. J. P. Souza, J. Yuan, Y. Zhou, L. Zhang, J. Chu, X. Pan, L. Hu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Zhong, S. Liu, F. Yan, D. Tan, R. Bachelard, C. J. Villas- Boas, A. C. Santos, and D. Yu, Optimal charging of a superconducting quantum battery, Quantum Sci. and Technol.7, 045018 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Camposeo, T

    A. Camposeo, T. Virgili, F. Lombardi, G. Cerullo, D. Pisignano, and M. Polini, Quantum batteries: A materials science perspective, Adv. Mater.37(2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993)

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993)

    1991

  58. [58]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics (Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    J. C. Louw, J. N. Kriel, and M. Kastner, Thermalization of a Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model coupled to a bosonic bath, Phys. Rev. A100, 022115 (2019)

    2019