pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31816 · v1 · pith:R7B5MG6Qnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.EP

Design and Performance of the Carruthers Geocoronal Imager

Martin Sirk , Alex M. Zhang , Thomas J. Immel , Jason B. McPhate , William W. Craig , Cathy Chou , Kodi Rider , Edward H. Wishnow
show 8 more authors
Anna L. Butterworth Ellen R. Taylor Lara Waldrop John T. Clarke Evan M. Widloski Pascal Blain J\'er\'emy Brisbois Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Vandenrijt
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP
keywords geocoronal imagerLyman-alphaexosphereUV imagingfar ultravioletCarruthers observatoryhydrogen emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

The GeoCoronal Imager uses two co-aligned UV channels to measure Lyman-alpha emission from Earth's exosphere at the sensitivity needed for global and regional studies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the design and laboratory performance of the GeoCoronal Imager, the main instrument on the Carruthers Geocorona Observatory. It establishes that the instrument meets the sensitivity, accuracy, and precision requirements set by the mission's science goals for mapping exospheric hydrogen structure and dynamics. The design consists of a Narrow Field Imager for detailed views near the limb and a Wide Field Imager for faint outer emission, both sharing cameras, intensifiers, and filter wheels. Performance is validated through vacuum ultraviolet tests and calibrations that confirm the system fulfills its objectives.

Core claim

The GCI is comprised of two co-aligned UV imaging systems. The Narrow Field Imager acquires nearly continuous images of exospheric Lyman-alpha radiance near and above the Earth's limb at relatively high spatial and temporal resolution, while the Wide Field Imager uses relatively higher optical sensitivity and a wider field of view to detect faint Lyman-alpha emission from the exosphere's outermost extent. Both channels feature identical active pixel sensor cameras, gain-intensifiers, and 6-position optical filter wheels. Vacuum ultraviolet laboratory test and calibration results demonstrate that the instrument achieves the sensitivity, accuracy and precision to meet the mission's scientific

What carries the argument

Dual co-aligned UV imaging channels (Narrow Field Imager and Wide Field Imager) with shared active pixel sensors, intensifiers, and filter wheels that capture 121.6 nm Lyman-alpha light from exospheric hydrogen.

If this is right

  • The Narrow Field Imager will provide high-resolution data on exospheric radiance near the limb to resolve regional dynamics.
  • The Wide Field Imager will extend measurements to the faint outer exosphere for global structure mapping.
  • Combined data from both channels will support analysis of hydrogen atom distribution and temporal changes at multiple scales.
  • Filter wheel positions will allow isolation of the 121.6 nm line while managing background signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful operation could enable direct comparison of exospheric models against spatially resolved observations rather than integrated column densities alone.
  • The dual-channel approach might be adapted for future missions targeting other planetary atmospheres if similar Lyman-alpha signals are targeted.
  • Calibration stability over the mission lifetime would determine whether long-term trends in exospheric hydrogen can be reliably extracted.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory vacuum ultraviolet test and calibration results will accurately predict on-orbit performance without major degradation from launch, thermal, or radiation effects not captured in ground testing.

What would settle it

Initial on-orbit measurements of Lyman-alpha radiance or instrument sensitivity that deviate substantially from the pre-launch laboratory calibration predictions.

read the original abstract

The GeoCoronal Imager (GCI) onboard the Carruthers Geocorona Observatory is the primary scientific instrument of the mission. It is designed to measure far ultraviolet light at 121.6 nm (Lyman-alpha) emitted by hydrogen (H) atoms in Earth's exosphere with the sensitivity, accuracy and precision to meet the mission's scientific objectives regarding the nature of terrestrial exospheric structure and dynamics on both global and regional scales. The GCI is comprised of two co-aligned UV imaging systems. The Narrow Field Imager (NFI) acquires nearly continuous images of exospheric Lyman-alpha radiance near and above the Earth's limb at relatively high spatial and temporal resolution, while the Wide Field Imager (WFI) uses relatively higher optical sensitivity and a wider field of view to detect faint Lyman-alpha emission from the exosphere's outermost extent. Both imaging channels feature identical active pixel sensor cameras, gain-intensifiers, and 6-position optical filter wheels. This paper outlines the instrument design requirements, informed by mission science goals, as well as its performance as measured in the vacuum ultraviolet laboratory test and calibration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the Carruthers Geocoronal Imager (GCI) as the primary instrument on the Carruthers Geocorona Observatory, consisting of co-aligned Narrow Field Imager (NFI) and Wide Field Imager (WFI) channels that use identical APS cameras, intensifiers, and filter wheels to measure Lyman-alpha (121.6 nm) emission from Earth's exosphere. Design requirements are derived from science goals for global and regional exospheric structure and dynamics, and performance is reported from vacuum ultraviolet laboratory tests and calibration.

Significance. If the laboratory-measured sensitivity, accuracy, and precision at 121.6 nm are shown to meet requirements and translate to on-orbit conditions, the GCI would deliver new data on terrestrial exospheric hydrogen at both high spatial/temporal resolution near the limb and for faint outer emission, supporting studies of exospheric dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the GCI provides 'the sensitivity, accuracy and precision to meet the mission's scientific objectives' is not supported by any quantitative lab-test results, error budgets, or direct comparisons of measured performance against the stated requirements.
  2. [Laboratory test and calibration section] Laboratory test and calibration section: No derivation or bounding is provided for additional error terms arising from launch vibration, thermal gradients, or radiation-induced effects on the intensifiers and APS cameras; the central claim that lab results suffice for on-orbit science therefore rests on the untested assumption that these terms are negligible.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit numerical values (e.g., effective area, quantum efficiency, or count rates at 121.6 nm) and tables comparing lab results to requirements.
  2. Figure captions and text should clarify whether the reported performance applies to both NFI and WFI channels or only one.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing the strongest honest response based on the content and scope of the paper, which focuses on instrument design and laboratory calibration.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the GCI provides 'the sensitivity, accuracy and precision to meet the mission's scientific objectives' is not supported by any quantitative lab-test results, error budgets, or direct comparisons of measured performance against the stated requirements.

    Authors: The manuscript body reports quantitative laboratory performance metrics, including sensitivity, accuracy, and precision at 121.6 nm, along with direct comparisons to the design requirements derived from science goals. However, the abstract itself does not include these specific values. We will revise the abstract to incorporate key quantitative results from the lab tests that support the claim of meeting mission objectives. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Laboratory test and calibration section] Laboratory test and calibration section: No derivation or bounding is provided for additional error terms arising from launch vibration, thermal gradients, or radiation-induced effects on the intensifiers and APS cameras; the central claim that lab results suffice for on-orbit science therefore rests on the untested assumption that these terms are negligible.

    Authors: The paper is explicitly limited to pre-launch design requirements and vacuum ultraviolet laboratory test and calibration results. It does not claim to have measured or bounded post-launch environmental effects, which cannot be fully quantified without flight data or dedicated environmental testing outside the current scope. We will revise the relevant section to explicitly state the assumptions regarding on-orbit conditions and note that these additional terms will be assessed during commissioning and operations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely descriptive hardware paper

full rationale

The manuscript is a design description and lab calibration report with no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems. Central claims rest on direct vacuum UV measurements of the NFI/WFI channels rather than any self-referential chain or imported ansatz. No load-bearing self-citations or renamings appear; the on-orbit extrapolation is explicitly an untested assumption, not a derived result. This is the normal non-circular case for instrument papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical models, derivations, or physical equations appear in the abstract; the work is an engineering description of an instrument rather than a theoretical result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5806 in / 1168 out tokens · 61185 ms · 2026-07-01T03:10:52.091786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Carruthers GCI Retrieval of Outer Exosphere Density,

    E. Widloski, J. Craig, and L. Waldrop, “Carruthers GCI Retrieval of Outer Exosphere Density,”Space Sci. Rev., 2026

    2026

  2. [2]

    Retrieval of global atomic hydrogen density at the exobase from Lyman-alpha emission measured by NASA’s Carruthers Geocorona Observatory,

    P. P. Joshi, L. Waldrop, T. Immel, M. Ondrejcek, and H. Filippini, “Retrieval of global atomic hydrogen density at the exobase from Lyman-alpha emission measured by NASA’s Carruthers Geocorona Observatory,”Space Sci. Rev., 2026

    2026

  3. [3]

    The TWINS-LAD mission: Observations of terrestrial Lyman-αfluxes,

    H. U. Nass, J. H. Zoennchen, G. Lay, and H.-J. Fahr, “The TWINS-LAD mission: Observations of terrestrial Lyman-αfluxes,”Astrophysics and Space Sciences Transactions, vol. 2, pp. 27–31, Jan. 2006.doi: 10.5194/astra-2-27- 2006

    work page doi:10.5194/astra-2-27- 2006

  4. [4]

    Comparison of terrestrial exospheric hydrogen 3D distributions at solar minimum and maxi- mum using TWINS Lyman-αobservations,

    J. H. Zoennchen, G. Cucho-Padin, L. Waldrop, and H. J. Fahr, “Comparison of terrestrial exospheric hydrogen 3D distributions at solar minimum and maxi- mum using TWINS Lyman-αobservations,”Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, vol. 11, p. 1 409 744, Oct. 2024, Art. no. 1409744.doi: 10.3389/fspas. 2024.1409744

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas 2024

  5. [5]

    Tomographic Estimation of Exospheric Hydrogen Density Distributions,

    G. Cucho-Padin and L. Waldrop, “Tomographic Estimation of Exospheric Hydrogen Density Distributions,”Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 5119–5139, Jun. 2018.doi: 10.1029/2018JA025323

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ja025323 2018

  6. [6]

    Time-Dependent Response of the Terrestrial Exosphere to a Geomagnetic Storm,

    G. Cucho-Padin and L. Waldrop, “Time-Dependent Response of the Terrestrial Exosphere to a Geomagnetic Storm,”grl, vol. 46, no. 21, pp. 11, 661–11, 670, Nov. 2019.doi: 10.1029/2019GL084327

    work page doi:10.1029/2019gl084327 2019

  7. [7]

    Initial observations with the Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) in the NASA TIMED satellite mission,

    A. B. Christensen et al., “Initial observations with the Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) in the NASA TIMED satellite mission,”Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 108, no. A12, 2003.doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2003JA009918

    2003

  8. [8]

    Lymanαairglow emission: Implications for atomic hydrogen geocorona variability with solar cycle,

    L. Waldrop and L. J. Paxton, “Lymanαairglow emission: Implications for atomic hydrogen geocorona variability with solar cycle,”J. Geophys. Res., vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 5874–5890, Sep. 2013.doi: 10.1002/jgra.50496

    work page doi:10.1002/jgra.50496 2013

  9. [9]

    Non-thermal hydrogen atoms in the terrestrial upper thermosphere,

    J. Qin and L. Waldrop, “Non-thermal hydrogen atoms in the terrestrial upper thermosphere,”Nature Communications, vol. 7, p. 13 655, Dec. 2016, Art. no. 13655.doi: 10.1038/ncomms13655

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13655 2016

  10. [10]

    Quantification of the Vertical Trans- port and Escape of Atomic Hydrogen in the Terrestrial Upper Atmosphere,

    P. P. Joshi, Y. D. Phal, and L. S. Waldrop, “Quantification of the Vertical Trans- port and Escape of Atomic Hydrogen in the Terrestrial Upper Atmosphere,” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 10, 468– 10, 481, Dec. 2019.doi: 10.1029/2019JA027057

    work page doi:10.1029/2019ja027057 2019

  11. [11]

    Apollo 16 Far-Ultraviolet Camer- a/Spectrograph: Earth Observations,

    George R. Carruthers and Thornton Page, “Apollo 16 Far-Ultraviolet Camer- a/Spectrograph: Earth Observations,”Science, vol. 177, no. 4051, pp. 788–791, 1972.doi: 10.1126/science.177.4051.788

    work page doi:10.1126/science.177.4051.788 1972

  12. [12]

    Hord,Galileo Earth 2 Press conference, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/ 19990117249, 1992

    C. Hord,Galileo Earth 2 Press conference, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/ 19990117249, 1992

    1992

  13. [13]

    Ecliptic North-South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona,

    S. Kameda et al., “Ecliptic North-South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 11, 706–11, 712, Dec. 2017.doi: 10. 1002/2017GL075915

    2017

  14. [14]

    The Earth’s Outer Exospheric Density Distributions Derived From PROCYON/LAICA UV Observations,

    G. Cucho-Padin, S. Kameda, and D. G. Sibeck, “The Earth’s Outer Exospheric Density Distributions Derived From PROCYON/LAICA UV Observations,” 28 Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 127, no. 6, e30211, Jun. 2022, Art. no. e30211.doi: 10.1029/2021JA030211

    work page doi:10.1029/2021ja030211 2022

  15. [15]

    Apollo 16 Lyman alpha imagery of the hydrogen geocorona,

    G. R. Carruthers, T. Page, and R. R. Meier, “Apollo 16 Lyman alpha imagery of the hydrogen geocorona,”J. Geophys. Res., vol. 81, no. 10, p. 1664, Apr. 1976. doi: 10.1029/JA081i010p01664

    work page doi:10.1029/ja081i010p01664 1976

  16. [16]

    Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP) mission: Exploring our solar neighborhood,

    M. Gkioulidou, “Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP) mission: Exploring our solar neighborhood,” in45th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 13-21 July, vol. 45, Jul. 2024, p. 2657

    2024

  17. [17]

    Forecasting the solar cycle using variational data assimila- tion: validation on cycles 22 to 25,

    L. Jouve et al., “Forecasting the solar cycle using variational data assimila- tion: validation on cycles 22 to 25,”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01053, May 2025, Art. no. arXiv:2505.01053.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01053 arXiv: 2505.01053 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.01053 2025

  18. [18]

    The Carruthers Geocoronal Observatory: Science Motivation and Objectives,

    L. Waldrop, J. T. Clarke, T. J. Immel, R. Kerr, P. P. Joshi, and G. Cucho-Padin, “The Carruthers Geocoronal Observatory: Science Motivation and Objectives,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. In review, no. -, pp. 0-0, Jun. 2026.doi: 0.0

    2026

  19. [19]

    Radiation pressure dynamics in plane- tary exospheres: A “natural

    J. Bishop and J. W. Chamberlain, “Radiation pressure dynamics in plane- tary exospheres: A “natural” framework,”Icarus, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 145–163, 1989,issn: 0019-1035.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0019- 1035(89)90131- 0 [Online]. Available: https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / 0019103589901310

    work page doi:10.1016/0019- 1989

  20. [20]

    Theory for planetary exospheres: II. Radiation pressure effect on exospheric density profiles

    A. Beth, P. Garnier, D. Toublanc, I. Dandouras, and C. Mazelle, “Theory for planetary exospheres: II. Radiation pressure effect on exospheric density pro- files,”icarus, vol. 266, pp. 423–432, Mar. 2016.doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.023 arXiv: 1503.08122[astro-ph.EP]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.023 2016

  21. [21]

    SWAN/SOHO Lyman-αMapping: The Hydrogen Geocorona Extends Well Beyond the Moon,

    I. I. Baliukin, J. .-. Bertaux, E. Qu´ emerais, V. V. Izmodenov, and W. Schmidt, “SWAN/SOHO Lyman-αMapping: The Hydrogen Geocorona Extends Well Beyond the Moon,”Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 861–885, Feb. 2019.doi: 10.1029/2018JA026136

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ja026136 2019

  22. [22]

    P. P. Joshi, “Remote sensing of ion-neutral charge exchange and diffusive trans- port in planetary atmospheres, PhD Disertation, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL,” 2022, https://hdl.handle.net/2142/115938

    2022

  23. [23]

    Monte carlo simulation of the terrestrial hydrogen exosphere,

    R. R. Hodges Jr., “Monte carlo simulation of the terrestrial hydrogen exosphere,” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 99, no. A12, pp. 23 229– 23 248, Dec. 1994.doi: 10.1029/94JA02183

    work page doi:10.1029/94ja02183 1994

  24. [24]

    Monte carlo simulation of the terrestrial hydrogen exosphere - Submitted,

    R. R. Hodges Jr., “Monte carlo simulation of the terrestrial hydrogen exosphere - Submitted,”Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 9999999, 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    A new relation between the central spectral solar H I Lymanαirradiance and the line irradiance measured by SUMER/SOHO during the cycle 23,

    C. Emerich, P. Lemaire, J.-C. Vial, W. Curdt, U. Sch¨ uhle, and K. Wilhelm, “A new relation between the central spectral solar H I Lymanαirradiance and the line irradiance measured by SUMER/SOHO during the cycle 23,”icarus, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 429–433, Nov. 2005.doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.05.002 2005

  26. [26]

    nasa.gov/gmao-products/osses/, 2026

    OSSE,NASA Observing System Simulation Experiments, https://gmao.gsfc. nasa.gov/gmao-products/osses/, 2026. 29

    2026

  27. [27]

    Numerical Model Simulation of the Carruthurs Geocoronal Observatory,

    H. Filippini et al., “Numerical Model Simulation of the Carruthurs Geocoronal Observatory,”Space Sci. Rev., vol. 99999, no. 99999, pp. 0-0, Feb. 2026.doi: 0.0

    2026

  28. [28]

    Zhang et al.,On-orbit calibration of the carruthers gci: Photon background removal, Under review by Space Science Reviews, 2026.doi: https://doi.org/10

    A. Zhang et al.,On-orbit calibration of the carruthers gci: Photon background removal, Under review by Space Science Reviews, 2026.doi: https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2606.24030 arXiv: 2606.24030[astro-ph.IM]. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Zhang et al.,On-orbit calibration of the carruthers gci: Radiometric sensi- tivity, Under review by Space Science Reviews, 2026.doi: https://doi.org/10

    A. Zhang et al.,On-orbit calibration of the carruthers gci: Radiometric sensi- tivity, Under review by Space Science Reviews, 2026.doi: https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2606.22705 arXiv: 2606.22705[astro-ph.IM]. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    On-orbit Calibration of the Carruthers GCI: Instrument Effect Correction

    A. Zhang, H. Filippini, L. Waldrop, and J. McPhate,On-orbit calibration of the carruthers gci: Instrument effect correction, Under review by Space Science Reviews, 2026.doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.21606 arXiv: 2606. 21606[astro-ph.IM]. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.21606 2026

  31. [31]

    The Interplanetary Hydrogen Cone and its Solar Cycle Variations,

    H. J. Fahr, “The Interplanetary Hydrogen Cone and its Solar Cycle Variations,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 14, p. 263, Sep. 1971

    1971

  32. [32]

    Uranian H Ly-αemission: The interstellar wind source,

    R. V. Yelle and B. R. Sandel, “Uranian H Ly-αemission: The interstellar wind source,”Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89–92, Feb. 1986.doi: 10.1029/GL013i002p00089

    work page doi:10.1029/gl013i002p00089 1986

  33. [33]

    The Carruthers Mission Concept and Performance,

    W. Craig et al., “The Carruthers Mission Concept and Performance,”Space Sci. Rev., vol. In Review, no. 99999, pp. 0-0, Jul. 2026.doi: 99999.99999

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Carruthers Observatory Student Solar Monitor (COSSMo) design and ground calibration (Conference Presentation),

    V. Naldoza et al., “Carruthers Observatory Student Solar Monitor (COSSMo) design and ground calibration (Conference Presentation),” inCubeSats, Small- Sats, and Hosted Payloads for Remote Sensing VIII, S. R. Babu, T. S. Pagano, and J. J. Puschell, Eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. PC13146, SPIE, 2024, PC1314608.doi: 10.1117/12.3027810

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3027810 2024

  35. [35]

    The Solar Extreme Ultraviolet Monitor for MAVEN,

    F. G. Eparvier, P. C. Chamberlin, T. N. Woods, and E. M. B. Thiemann, “The Solar Extreme Ultraviolet Monitor for MAVEN,”ssr, vol. 195, no. 1-4, pp. 293– 301, Dec. 2015.doi: 10.1007/s11214-015-0195-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0195-2 2015

  36. [36]

    Alignment and ground calibration of the Carruthers GeoCoronal Imager,

    K. Rider et al., “Alignment and ground calibration of the Carruthers GeoCoronal Imager,” inProceedings Volume 13093, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, SPIE; 1309339, 2024.doi: 10.1117/12.3018528

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3018528 2024

  37. [38]

    The quantum efficiency and stability of UV and soft X-ray photocathodes,

    A. Tremsin and O. Siegmund, “The quantum efficiency and stability of UV and soft X-ray photocathodes,”Proc SPIE, vol. 5920, Aug. 2005.doi: 10.1117/12. 621761

    work page doi:10.1117/12 2005

  38. [39]

    Stability of quantum efficiency and vis- ible light rejection of alkali halide photocathodes,

    A. S. Tremsin and O. H. Siegmund, “Stability of quantum efficiency and vis- ible light rejection of alkali halide photocathodes,” inUV, Optical, and IR Space Telescopes and Instruments, J. B. Breckinridge and P. Jakobsen, Eds., 30 ser. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 4013, Jul. 2000, pp. 411–420.doi: 10.11...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.394023 2000

  39. [40]

    In Flight Performance of the Far Ultraviolet Instrument (FUV) on ICON,

    H. U. Frey et al., “In Flight Performance of the Far Ultraviolet Instrument (FUV) on ICON,”ssr, vol. 219, no. 3, p. 23, Apr. 2023, Art. no. 23.doi: 10. 1007/s11214-023-00969-9

    2023

  40. [41]

    html, 2025

    PTB,Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, https://www.ptb.de/cms/en. html, 2025

    2025

  41. [42]

    DAOPHOT: A Computer Program for Crowded-Field Stellar Photometry,

    P. B. Stetson, “DAOPHOT: A Computer Program for Crowded-Field Stellar Photometry,”pasp, vol. 99, p. 191, Mar. 1987.doi: 10.1086/131977

    work page doi:10.1086/131977 1987

  42. [43]

    Comparing Restored HST and VLA Imagery of R Aquarii,

    J. M. Hollis, J. E. Dorband, and F. Yusef-Zadeh, “Comparing Restored HST and VLA Imagery of R Aquarii,”apj, vol. 386, p. 293, Feb. 1992.doi: 10.1086/171015

    work page doi:10.1086/171015 1992

  43. [44]

    Effect of Temperature on the Vacuum Ultraviolet Transmittance of Lithium Fluoride, Calcium Fluoride, Bar- ium Fluoride, and Sapphire,

    A. H. Laufer, J. A. Pirog, and J. R. McNesby, “Effect of Temperature on the Vacuum Ultraviolet Transmittance of Lithium Fluoride, Calcium Fluoride, Bar- ium Fluoride, and Sapphire,”Optical Society of America, 1965.doi: 10.1364/ josa.55.000064

    1965

  44. [45]

    Design and Performance of the Carruthers Geocornal Imager - Supplemental Online Content,

    M. M. Sirk et al., “Design and Performance of the Carruthers Geocornal Imager - Supplemental Online Content,”Space Sci. Rev., 2026.doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.16862116 31

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16862116 2026