Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology is Alive and Well - A Reply to Disney
classification
🌌 astro-ph
gr-qc
keywords
cosmologydisneyhistoricalaccountachievementsactialivearticle
read the original abstract
A recent criticism of cosmological methodology and achievements by Disney (2000) is assessed. Some historical and epistemological fallacies in the said article have been highlighted. It is shown that---both empirically and epistemologically---modern cosmology lies on sounder foundations than it is portrayed. A brief historical account demonstrates that this form of unsatisfaction with cosmology has had a long tradition, and rather meagre results in the course of the XX century.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.