The Complexity of Probabilistic versus Quantum Finite Automata
classification
🪐 quant-ph
keywords
finiteautomatonstatesepsilonprobabilisticquantumautomatacomplexity
read the original abstract
We present a language $L_n$ which is recognizable by a probabilistic finite automaton (PFA) with probability $1 - \epsilon$ for all $\epsilon > 0$ with $O(log^2n)$ states, with a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) with O(n) states, but a quantum finite automaton (QFA) needs at least $2^{\Omega(n/ \log n)}$ states.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.