Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Annotated Bibliography of Some Papers on Combining Significances or p-values

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0705.2209 v2 pith:RCLOKBPP submitted 2007-05-15 physics.data-an

Robert D. Cousins This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.data-an
keywords someeffectexperimentquestionadditionalannotatedanotheranswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A question that comes up repeatedly is how to combine the results of two experiments if all that is known is that one experiment had a n-sigma effect and another experiment had a m-sigma effect. This question is not well-posed: depending on what additional assumptions are made, the preferred answer is different. The note lists some of the more prominent papers on the topic, with some brief comments and excerpts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Score Combining for Contrastive OOD Detection

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GLRT-based score-combining rule slightly improves average AUROC and detection rate over CSI/SupCSI and classical p-value combination methods in dataset-vs-dataset and leave-one-class-out OOD experiments.

Pith tools