pith. sign in

arxiv: 0710.4853 · v1 · submitted 2007-10-25 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

Erratum: Propagation Effects on the Breakdown of a Linear Amplifier Model: Complex-Mass Schrodinger Equation Driven by the Square of a Gaussian Field

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP
keywords belowentireequationfunctioninequalitymathbbaboveaccording
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The proof of the inequality $\lambda_{q}(x,t)\le (q\mu_{x,t} -0^+)^{-1}$ [p 750, below Eq. (29)] is based on the statement that ${\cal E}(x,t;s)$ is an entire function of $s\in {\mathbb C}^M$ [see below Eq. (30)]. But according to Equation (9) and Lemma 1, all we know is that ${\cal E}(x,t;s)$ is an entire function of $k(s)\in {\mathbb R}^N$. Nevertheless, the above inequality holds, hence the proposition 1.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.