Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling method"
classification
🌀 gr-qc
keywords
arxivcommentanotherarticlecriscienzofourhaywardinvariance
read the original abstract
I reply to the four points raised by S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini (arXiv:0909.2956v1) against my comment (arXiv:0907.2020v1) to their previous article. I maintain my position on the wrongness of their paper, reporting also another mistake.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.