REVIEW 1 cited by
The M-Sigma Relation Derived from Sphere of Influence Arguments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The observed relation between supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass (M) and bulge stellar velocity dispersion (Sigma) is described by log(M) = alpha + beta*log(Sigma/200 km/s). As this relation has important implications for models of galaxy and SMBH formation and evolution, there continues to be great interest in adding to the M catalog. The "sphere of influence" (r) argument uses spatial resolution to exclude some M estimates and pre-select additional galaxies for further SMBH studies. This Letter quantifies the effects of applying the r argument to a population of galaxies and SMBHs that do not follow the M-Sigma relation. All galaxies with known values of Sigma, closer than 100 Mpc, are given a random M and selected when r is spatially resolved. These random SMBHs produce an M-Sigma relation of alpha=8.3, beta=4.0, consistent with observed values. Consequently, future proposed M estimates should not be justified solely on the basis of resolving r. This Letter shows the observed M-Sigma relation may simply be a result of available spatial resolution. However, it also implies the observed M-Sigma relation defines an upper limit. This potentially provides valuable new insight into the processes of galaxy and SMBH formation and evolution.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Uncertainties in the supermassive black hole abundance and implications for the GW background
Cross-catalog offsets in black hole mass proxies shift the predicted nHz gravitational wave background by factors comparable to PTA uncertainties; matching the observed amplitude requires a selection effect of about o...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.