pith. sign in

arxiv: 1102.1449 · v2 · pith:NWI7S5EOnew · submitted 2011-02-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Inhomogeneous cosmological models: exact solutions and their applications

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords cosmologicalinhomogeneousmodelsalternativeassumptionexactobservationsaccount
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently, inhomogeneous generalisations of the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker cosmological models have gained interest in the astrophysical community and are more often employed to study cosmological phenomena. However, in many papers the inhomogeneous cosmological models are treated as an alternative to the FLRW models. In fact, they are not an alternative, but an exact perturbation of the latter, and are gradually becoming a necessity in modern cosmology. The assumption of homogeneity is just a first approximation introduced to simplify equations. So far this assumption is commonly believed to have worked well, but future and more precise observations will not be properly analysed unless inhomogeneities are taken into account. This paper reviews recent developments in the field and shows the importance of an inhomogeneous framework in the analysis of cosmological observations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CMB dipoles and other low-order multipoles in the quasispherical Szekeres model

    astro-ph.CO 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quasispherical Szekeres models allow a small but less special observer region for CMB dipole consistency and can accommodate significant quadrupole unlike LTB voids.

  2. Updates on dipolar anisotropy in local measurements of the Hubble constant from Cosmicflows-4

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Local Hubble constant anisotropy in Cosmicflows-4 data is primarily attributed to peculiar velocities and survey structure rather than cosmic-scale isotropy violation, with limited implications for the Hubble tension.