REVIEW 2 cited by
On Distribution Preserving Quantization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Upon compressing perceptually relevant signals, conventional quantization generally results in unnatural outcomes at low rates. We propose distribution preserving quantization (DPQ) to solve this problem. DPQ is a new quantization concept that confines the probability space of the reconstruction to be identical to that of the source. A distinctive feature of DPQ is that it facilitates a seamless transition between signal synthesis and quantization. A theoretical analysis of DPQ leads to a distribution preserving rate-distortion function (DP-RDF), which serves as a lower bound on the rate of any DPQ scheme, under a constraint on distortion. In general situations, the DP-RDF approaches the classic rate-distortion function for the same source and distortion measure, in the limit of an increasing rate. A practical DPQ scheme based on a multivariate transformation is also proposed. This scheme asymptotically achieves the DP-RDF for i.i.d. Gaussian sources and the mean squared error.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rate-Distortion-Perception Trade-off with Strong Realism Constraints: Role of Side Information and Common Randomness
The paper gives single-letter rate-distortion-perception limits for lossy compression with side information under strong realism constraints, including a complete Gaussian solution.
-
Lossy Compression, Realism, and Coordination
Rate-distortion-perception compression and channel-synthesis coordination are two sides of the same coin, and the paper proposes transferring batched-critic realism ideas to coordination as an open problem.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.