REVIEW 3 cited by
Algorithms for Approximate Minimization of the Difference Between Submodular Functions, with Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We extend the work of Narasimhan and Bilmes [30] for minimizing set functions representable as a difference between submodular functions. Similar to [30], our new algorithms are guaranteed to monotonically reduce the objective function at every step. We empirically and theoretically show that the per-iteration cost of our algorithms is much less than [30], and our algorithms can be used to efficiently minimize a difference between submodular functions under various combinatorial constraints, a problem not previously addressed. We provide computational bounds and a hardness result on the mul- tiplicative inapproximability of minimizing the difference between submodular functions. We show, however, that it is possible to give worst-case additive bounds by providing a polynomial time computable lower-bound on the minima. Finally we show how a number of machine learning problems can be modeled as minimizing the difference between submodular functions. We experimentally show the validity of our algorithms by testing them on the problem of feature selection with submodular cost features.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sum of Squares Submodularity
A new hierarchy, t-sos submodularity, provides polynomial-time checkable sufficient conditions for submodularity and, at high t, an exact characterization.
-
MASCOT: Model-Aware Submodular Coverage for Composite-Attribute Text-to-Image Retrieval
On composite geography-plus-hour diversity-decrease retrieval, a submodular coverage re-ranker with query-weighted soft bins retains R@10=0.94 versus 0.49 for the manifold-based MS-DPP baseline.
-
On additive averaging kernels for finite Markov chains
For reversible finite Markov chains, the additive blend αP+(1−α)G mixes fastest at intermediate α, and the best two-block partition maximizes a Cheeger-type cut functional.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.