Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

OpenML: networked science in machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.7722 v2 pith:WUDLGMQ3 submitted 2014-07-29 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords learningmachineopenmlnetworkedorganizescienceadoptingbenefits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many sciences have made significant breakthroughs by adopting online tools that help organize, structure and mine information that is too detailed to be printed in journals. In this paper, we introduce OpenML, a place for machine learning researchers to share and organize data in fine detail, so that they can work more effectively, be more visible, and collaborate with others to tackle harder problems. We discuss how OpenML relates to other examples of networked science and what benefits it brings for machine learning research, individual scientists, as well as students and practitioners.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BOASF: A Unified Framework for Speeding up Automatic Machine Learning via Adaptive Successive Filtering

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BOASF combines Bayesian optimization with adaptive successive filtering and softmax resource allocation to speed up model selection and hyperparameter optimization in automatic machine learning.

  2. VisTabNet: Adapting Vision Transformers for Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pre-trained image ViT encoder, fed with learned projections of tabular rows, beats tree ensembles and tabular deep learning baselines on average across 23 small datasets.

  3. Bag of Tricks for Multimodal AutoML with Image, Text, and Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 22-dataset benchmark compares existing multimodal AutoML tricks, and an automatic ensemble of those tricks achieves the most robust performance.

Pith tools