REVIEW 2 cited by
Measuring CP violation in Two-Higgs-Doublet models in light of the LHC Higgs data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In Two-Higgs-Doublet models, the conditions for CP violation can be expressed in terms of invariants under U(2) rotations among the two SU(2) Higgs doublet fields. In order to design a strategy for measuring the invariants we express them in terms of observables, i.e., masses and couplings of scalar bosons. We find amplitudes directly sensitive to the invariants. Observation of the Standard-Model-like Higgs boson at the LHC severely constrains the models. In particular, in the model with Z_2 symmetry imposed on dimension-4 terms (in order to eliminate tree-level flavour-changing neutral currents), CP violation is strongly suppressed. On the other hand, the most general Two-Higgs-Doublet model (without Z_2 symmetry) would still allow for CP violation to be present in the model, without being in conflict with the LHC data. Consequently, also flavour-changing neutral currents would in general be expected. We briefly sketch a strategy for measuring the remaining CP violation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CP violation in H^\pm \to W^\pm Z: A physical approach for the 2HDM
H±→W±Z develops a one-loop CP-violating charge asymmetry in the 2HDM from internal bosonic and fermionic loop interferences, with the purely bosonic part vanishing in the alignment limit when the extra scalars are heavy.
-
A Deep Dive into Baryon Asymmetry -- the C2HDM
New BSMPT implementation of baryon asymmetry computation using WKB transport equations with moment truncations and VEV profile solving, validated in the C2HDM with uncertainty and GW interplay analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.