REVIEW 3 cited by
The enigma of the pseudogap phase of the cuprate superconductors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The last few years have seen significant experimental progress in characterizing the copper-based hole-doped high temperature superconductors in the regime of low hole density, p. Quantum oscillations, NMR, X-ray, and STM experiments have shed much light on the nature of the ordering at low temperatures. We review evidence that the order parameter in the non-Lanthanum-based cuprates is a d-form factor density-wave. This novel order acts as an unexpected window into the electronic structure of the pseudogap phase at higher temperatures in zero field: we argue in favor of a `fractionalized Fermi liquid' (FL*) with 4 pockets of spin S=1/2, charge +e fermions enclosing an area specified by p.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Thermopower across Fermi-volume-changing quantum phase transitions without translational symmetry breaking
A large-N model of a Fermi-volume-changing transition without symmetry breaking predicts a skewed marginal Fermi liquid with large asymmetric thermopower, matching CeRhIn5 and Nd-LSCO data.
-
Lectures on insulating and conducting quantum spin liquids
The notes argue that the FL* state — small pockets plus a quantized spin-liquid anomaly — resolves the ADMR pocket and v_F >> v_Delta problems that defeated holon-metal and plain fermionic-parton theories of the cuprates.
-
Fractionalized Fermi liquids and the cuprate phase diagram
Reviews the FL* theory for cuprates using ancilla layer models and SU(2) gauge theories to explain pseudogap hole pockets of area p/8, Fermi arcs, and transitions to d-wave superconductivity and Fermi liquid behavior.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.