Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Risk Bounds for the Majority Vote: From a PAC-Bayesian Analysis to a Learning Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1503.08329 v2 pith:JOXG7JTU submitted 2015-03-28 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords analysispac-bayesianboundsc-boundextensivelearningmajoritymincq
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an extensive analysis of the behavior of majority votes in binary classification. In particular, we introduce a risk bound for majority votes, called the C-bound, that takes into account the average quality of the voters and their average disagreement. We also propose an extensive PAC-Bayesian analysis that shows how the C-bound can be estimated from various observations contained in the training data. The analysis intends to be self-contained and can be used as introductory material to PAC-Bayesian statistical learning theory. It starts from a general PAC-Bayesian perspective and ends with uncommon PAC-Bayesian bounds. Some of these bounds contain no Kullback-Leibler divergence and others allow kernel functions to be used as voters (via the sample compression setting). Finally, out of the analysis, we propose the MinCq learning algorithm that basically minimizes the C-bound. MinCq reduces to a simple quadratic program. Aside from being theoretically grounded, MinCq achieves state-of-the-art performance, as shown in our extensive empirical comparison with both AdaBoost and the Support Vector Machine.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Predictively Oriented Posteriors

    stat.ME 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new posterior family scores the posterior predictive directly, giving slower concentration but better predictive performance under model misspecification.

  2. Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Learning a margin-based confidence ranker for LLM judges improves agreement-target success in cascaded selective evaluation compared to heuristic confidence scores.

  3. Enhancing Robust Fairness via Confusional Spectral Regularization

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A PAC-Bayesian bound ties worst-class robust error to the spectral norm of a robust confusion matrix, and a new spectral regularizer improves robust fairness.

Pith tools