Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Elliptical Galaxies and Bulges of Disk Galaxies: Summary of Progress and Outstanding Issues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.03330 v1 pith:OH4CJMCM submitted 2015-04-13 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords bulgesformationellipticalsgalaxygalaxiesdisksevolutionreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This is the summary chapter of a review book on galaxy bulges. Bulge properties and formation histories are more varied than those of ellipticals. I emphasize two advances: 1 - "Classical bulges" are observationally indistinguishable from ellipticals, and like them, are thought to form by major galaxy mergers. "Disky pseudobulges" are diskier and more actively star-forming (except in S0s) than are ellipticals. Theys are products of the slow ("secular") evolution of galaxy disks: bars and other nonaxisymmetries move disk gas toward the center, where it starbursts and builds relatively flat, rapidly rotating components. This secular evolution is a new area of galaxy evolution work that complements hierarchical clustering. 2 - Disks of high-redshift galaxies are unstable to the formation of mass clumps that sink to the center and merge - an alternative channel for the formation of classical bulges. I review successes and unsolved problems in the formation of bulges+ellipticals and their coevolution (or not) with supermassive black holes. I present an observer's perspective on simulations of dark matter galaxy formation including baryons. I review how our picture of the quenching of star formation is becoming general and secure at redshifts z < 1. The biggest challenge is to produce realistic bulges+ellipticals and disks that overlap over a factor of 10**3 in mass but that differ from each other as observed over that whole range. Second, how does hierarchical clustering make so many giant, bulgeless galaxies in field but not cluster environments? I argue that we rely too much on AGN and star-formation feedback to solve these challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structural and Stellar Population Properties vs. Bulge Types in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Central Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Central stellar density within 1 kpc is a serviceable bulge-type indicator, and mapping it against star formation shows pseudo-bulges are uniformly star-forming while classical bulges span a wide range of star formation.

  2. BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey -- XIII. The nature of the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe

    astro-ph.GA 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The most luminous local obscured AGN have no distinctive black-hole or host properties, span about 4 dex in radio luminosity with frequent double lobes, and sit where radiation-pressure-driven unification predicts the...

Pith tools