Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning for metagenomics: methods and tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1510.06621 v2 pith:ZCVTEN63 submitted 2015-10-22 q-bio.GN

classification q-bio.GN
keywords learningmachinemetagenomicsapproachesmetagenomicmethodsreviewanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Owing to the complexity and variability of metagenomic studies, modern machine learning approaches have seen increased usage to answer a variety of question encompassing the full range of metagenomic NGS data analysis. We review here the contribution of machine learning techniques for the field of metagenomics, by presenting known successful approaches in a unified framework. This review focuses on five important metagenomic problems: OTU-clustering, binning, taxonomic profling and assignment, comparative metagenomics and gene prediction. For each of these problems, we identify the most prominent methods, summarize the machine learning approaches used and put them into perspective of similar methods. We conclude our review looking further ahead at the challenge posed by the analysis of interactions within microbial communities and different environments, in a field one could call "integrative metagenomics".

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VisTabNet: Adapting Vision Transformers for Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pre-trained image ViT encoder, fed with learned projections of tabular rows, beats tree ensembles and tabular deep learning baselines on average across 23 small datasets.

Pith tools