Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constraining dark energy with Hubble parameter measurements: an analysis including future redshift-drift observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.07703 v4 pith:2WQCNCSN submitted 2015-12-24 astro-ph.CO

Constraining dark energy with Hubble parameter measurements: an analysis including future redshift-drift observations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords darkenergyhubblemeasurementsconstrainingdistancesobservationsparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dark energy affects the Hubble expansion rate (namely, the expansion history) $H(z)$ by an integral over $w(z)$. However, the usual observables are the luminosity distances or the angular diameter distances, which measure the distance-redshift relation. Actually, dark energy affects the distances (and the growth factor) by a further integration over functions of $H(z)$. Thus, the direct measurements of the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ at different redshifts are of great importance for constraining the properties of dark energy. In this paper, we show how the typical dark energy models, for example, the $\Lambda$CDM, $w$CDM, CPL, and holographic dark energy (HDE) models, can be constrained by the current direct measurements of $H(z)$ (31 data in total, covering the redshift range of $z\in [0.07,2.34]$). In fact, the future redshift-drift observations (also referred to as the Sandage-Loeb test) can also directly measure $H(z)$ at higher redshifts, covering the range of $z\in [2,5]$. We thus discuss what role the redshift-drift observations can play in constraining dark energy with the Hubble parameter measurements. We show that the constraints on dark energy can be improved greatly with the $H(z)$ data from only a 10-year observation of redshift drift.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent H0 from GWTC-4 standard sirens and TDCOSMO 2025 strong lensing time delays

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Combining GWTC-4 standard sirens with TDCOSMO2025 lensing data under the distance sum rule yields H0 = 83.78 +12.53/-10.23 km/s/Mpc (13.6% precision) in one configuration, consistent with both Planck and SH0ES.

  2. Resolving the Hubble Tension in the Early Dark Energy Framework with JWST and DESI Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Axion EDE model fitted to Planck/ACT/SPT CMB, DESI BAO, and JWST UV luminosity function data yields H0 = 71.58 ± 1.05 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}, reduces H0 tension to 1.0 sigma, and improves Δχ^{2}_tot = -18.26 over Λ CDM.