Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Upper Ocean Turbulent Dissipation Rate due to Very Short Breaking Wind-Waves

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.06649 v1 pith:IZJPGAFI submitted 2016-02-22 physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-ph

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.ao-ph
keywords dissipationratebreakingtotalwavetheyveryboundary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sutherland and Melville (2015a) investigated the relative contributions to the total dissipation rate in the ocean surface wave boundary layer of different breaking wave scales, from large-scale whitecaps to micro-breakers. Based on their measurements of geometric/kinematic properties of breaking waves for a wide range of wave ages, they inferred the dissipation rates from breaking as a function of scale. These results were compared with their complementary measurements of the total dissipation rate in the underlying wave boundary layer. They reported that the total depth-integrated dissipation rate in the water column agreed well with dissipation rate from breaking waves for young to very old wind seas. They also reported high observed levels of dissipation rate very near the sea surface. They concluded that this showed a large fraction of the total dissipation rate was due to non-air entraining micro-breakers and very small whitecaps. Because of its fundamental importance, both physically and for accurate air-sea interaction modeling, we assess the validity of these conclusions. Our analysis of their data shows that the microbreakers and small whitecaps do not make a significant contribution to the total turbulent dissipation rate in the wave boundary layer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools