Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning for Music

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.04930 v1 pith:E4KBBVBF submitted 2016-06-15 cs.LG cs.SD

classification cs.LGcs.SD
keywords musicdeepneuralworkbeengenerationlearningmelody
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our goal is to be able to build a generative model from a deep neural network architecture to try to create music that has both harmony and melody and is passable as music composed by humans. Previous work in music generation has mainly been focused on creating a single melody. More recent work on polyphonic music modeling, centered around time series probability density estimation, has met some partial success. In particular, there has been a lot of work based off of Recurrent Neural Networks combined with Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RNN-RBM) and other similar recurrent energy based models. Our approach, however, is to perform end-to-end learning and generation with deep neural nets alone.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Auto-Regressive vs Flow-Matching: a Comparative Study of Modeling Paradigms for Text-to-Music Generation

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under matched training conditions, auto-regressive models slightly outperform flow-matching on music quality and temporal control, while flow-matching offers faster inference and better inpainting flexibility.

Pith tools