Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Group Sparse Regularization for Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.00485 v1 pith:PN76LMQ7 submitted 2016-07-02 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords groupinputlassonetworkweightscompactdeepfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider the joint task of simultaneously optimizing (i) the weights of a deep neural network, (ii) the number of neurons for each hidden layer, and (iii) the subset of active input features (i.e., feature selection). While these problems are generally dealt with separately, we present a simple regularized formulation allowing to solve all three of them in parallel, using standard optimization routines. Specifically, we extend the group Lasso penalty (originated in the linear regression literature) in order to impose group-level sparsity on the network's connections, where each group is defined as the set of outgoing weights from a unit. Depending on the specific case, the weights can be related to an input variable, to a hidden neuron, or to a bias unit, thus performing simultaneously all the aforementioned tasks in order to obtain a compact network. We perform an extensive experimental evaluation, by comparing with classical weight decay and Lasso penalties. We show that a sparse version of the group Lasso penalty is able to achieve competitive performances, while at the same time resulting in extremely compact networks with a smaller number of input features. We evaluate both on a toy dataset for handwritten digit recognition, and on multiple realistic large-scale classification problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Smaller Models, Better Generalization

    cs.LG 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A regularizer claimed to minimize a VC dimension bound for neural networks is proposed, but the bound derivation drops a required term and the empirical gains over L2 regularization are inconsistent.

Pith tools