Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparative Study of Long and Short GRBs. I. Overlapping Properties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.03383 v1 pith:3BS3YVD3 submitted 2016-08-11 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords grbslongparameterspropertiesshortenergygammalight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are classified into long and short categories based on their durations. Broad band studies suggest that these two categories of objects roughly correspond to two different classes of progenitor systems, i.e. compact star mergers (Type I) vs. massive star core collapse (Type II). However, the duration criterion sometimes leads to mis-identification of the progenitor systems. We perform a comprehensive multi-wavelength comparative study between duration-defined long GRBs and short GRBs as well as the so-called "consensus" long GRBs and short GRBs (which are believed to be more closely related to the two types of progenitor systems). The parameters we study include two parts: the prompt emission properties including duration ($T_{90}$), spectral peak energy ($E_{\rm p}$), low energy photon index ($\alpha$), isotropic $\gamma$-ray energy ($E_{\rm \gamma, iso}$), isotropic peak luminosity ($L_{\rm p,iso}$), and the amplitude parameters ($f$ and $f_{\rm eff}$); and the host galaxy properties including stellar mass ($M_*$), star formation rate (SFR), metallicity ([X/H]), half light radius ($R_{50}$), angular and physical ($R_{\rm off}$) offset of the afterglow from the center of the host galaxy, the normalized offset ($r_{\rm off}=R_{\rm off}/R_{50}$), and the brightness fraction $F_{\rm light}$. For most parameters, we find interesting overlapping properties between the two populations in both 1D and 2D distribution plots. The three best parameters for the classification purpose are $T_{90}$, $f_{\rm eff}$, and $F_{\rm light}$. However, no single parameter alone is good enough to place a particular burst into the right physical category, suggesting a need of multiple criteria for physical classification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Connecting afterglow light curves to the GRB central engine

    astro-ph.HE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    From simulated afterglows, the position of the jet break (or maximum for off-axis events) alone gives the isotropic kinetic energy of a short GRB to tens of percent, via fitted power-law relations.

Pith tools