Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine Translation Approaches and Survey for Indian Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.04290 v1 pith:MXIZDJLL submitted 2017-01-16 cs.CL

Nadeem Jadoon Khan , Waqas Anwar , Nadir Durrani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords indianlanguagelanguagespairstranslationbaselinedatamachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we present an analysis regarding the performance of the state-of-art Phrase-based Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) on multiple Indian languages. We report baseline systems on several language pairs. The motivation of this study is to promote the development of SMT and linguistic resources for these language pairs, as the current state-of-the-art is quite bleak due to sparse data resources. The success of an SMT system is contingent on the availability of a large parallel corpus. Such data is necessary to reliably estimate translation probabilities. We report the performance of baseline systems translating from Indian languages (Bengali, Guajarati, Hindi, Malayalam, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu) into English with average 10% accurate results for all the language pairs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparative analysis of subword tokenization approaches for Indian languages

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across SMT and NMT models for 11 Indian languages, SentencePiece gives the highest BLEU for most language pairs, while BPE wins in the multilingual model.

Pith tools