Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twins

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.04960 v1 pith:NSAZQOAB submitted 2017-04-17 cs.LG cs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.NE
keywords adversarialbinaryclassifiercleandataattackdeepempirically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial attack has cast a shadow on the massive success of deep neural networks. Despite being almost visually identical to the clean data, the adversarial images can fool deep neural networks into wrong predictions with very high confidence. In this paper, however, we show that we can build a simple binary classifier separating the adversarial apart from the clean data with accuracy over 99%. We also empirically show that the binary classifier is robust to a second-round adversarial attack. In other words, it is difficult to disguise adversarial samples to bypass the binary classifier. Further more, we empirically investigate the generalization limitation which lingers on all current defensive methods, including the binary classifier approach. And we hypothesize that this is the result of intrinsic property of adversarial crafting algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defending Against Adversarial Iris Examples Using Wavelet Decomposition

    cs.CV 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three wavelet-based denoising strategies detect adversarial iris images by removing or denoising the wavelet sub-bands most affected by the attack.

Pith tools