REVIEW 1 cited by
Lexical Features in Coreference Resolution: To be Used With Caution
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Lexical features are a major source of information in state-of-the-art coreference resolvers. Lexical features implicitly model some of the linguistic phenomena at a fine granularity level. They are especially useful for representing the context of mentions. In this paper we investigate a drawback of using many lexical features in state-of-the-art coreference resolvers. We show that if coreference resolvers mainly rely on lexical features, they can hardly generalize to unseen domains. Furthermore, we show that the current coreference resolution evaluation is clearly flawed by only evaluating on a specific split of a specific dataset in which there is a notable overlap between the training, development and test sets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mogrifier LSTM
Mogrifier LSTM, which applies repeated mutual gating between the input and previous hidden state, outperforms the LSTM on PTB, Wikitext-2, Enwik8, and MWC language modeling.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.