REVIEW 1 cited by
Argument Mining with Structured SVMs and RNNs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose a novel factor graph model for argument mining, designed for settings in which the argumentative relations in a document do not necessarily form a tree structure. (This is the case in over 20% of the web comments dataset we release.) Our model jointly learns elementary unit type classification and argumentative relation prediction. Moreover, our model supports SVM and RNN parametrizations, can enforce structure constraints (e.g., transitivity), and can express dependencies between adjacent relations and propositions. Our approaches outperform unstructured baselines in both web comments and argumentative essay datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation
A single LoRA fine-tuned Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model trained jointly on eight argument-mining tasks across 19 datasets matches or beats task-specific models, and merged models offer a cheaper compromise.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.