Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning for User Comment Moderation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.09993 v2 pith:RPX7RM7S submitted 2017-05-28 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords moderationcommentsdeepuserattentionautomaticbaselineclassification-specific
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Experimenting with a new dataset of 1.6M user comments from a Greek news portal and existing datasets of English Wikipedia comments, we show that an RNN outperforms the previous state of the art in moderation. A deep, classification-specific attention mechanism improves further the overall performance of the RNN. We also compare against a CNN and a word-list baseline, considering both fully automatic and semi-automatic moderation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving Multilingual Social Media Insights: Aspect-based Comment Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new multilingual dataset and an SFT+DPO LLM pipeline for generating comment aspect terms yields small clustering improvements, but the benchmark construction and missing artifacts limit the strength of the evidence.

Pith tools