Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On Unifying Deep Generative Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.00550 v5 pith:BNTH6YSV submitted 2017-06-02 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords gansgenerativevaeslearningadversarialdeepinferencemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep generative models have achieved impressive success in recent years. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), as emerging families for generative model learning, have largely been considered as two distinct paradigms and received extensive independent studies respectively. This paper aims to establish formal connections between GANs and VAEs through a new formulation of them. We interpret sample generation in GANs as performing posterior inference, and show that GANs and VAEs involve minimizing KL divergences of respective posterior and inference distributions with opposite directions, extending the two learning phases of classic wake-sleep algorithm, respectively. The unified view provides a powerful tool to analyze a diverse set of existing model variants, and enables to transfer techniques across research lines in a principled way. For example, we apply the importance weighting method in VAE literatures for improved GAN learning, and enhance VAEs with an adversarial mechanism that leverages generated samples. Experiments show generality and effectiveness of the transferred techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Style Transfer for Texts: Retrain, Report Errors, Compare with Rewrites

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors show that standard text style-transfer metrics are unstable and manipulable, recommend BLEU against human rewrites as an additional benchmark, and report three architectures that improve on that metric.

  2. How Optimality Structures Sparse Dictionaries: A Theory for Understanding SAE Representations

    q-bio.NC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Derives optimality constraints for nonnegative joint dictionary learning that explain observed SAE behaviors such as feature splitting, absorption, and dense antipodal features.

Pith tools