REVIEW 2 cited by
One-step and Two-step Classification for Abusive Language Detection on Twitter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automatic abusive language detection is a difficult but important task for online social media. Our research explores a two-step approach of performing classification on abusive language and then classifying into specific types and compares it with one-step approach of doing one multi-class classification for detecting sexist and racist languages. With a public English Twitter corpus of 20 thousand tweets in the type of sexism and racism, our approach shows a promising performance of 0.827 F-measure by using HybridCNN in one-step and 0.824 F-measure by using logistic regression in two-steps.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Enhancing LLM-based Hatred and Toxicity Detection with Meta-Toxic Knowledge Graph
MetaTox constructs a meta-toxic knowledge graph from toxic corpora and injects retrieved triplets into LLM prompts, improving toxicity detection and lowering false positives, especially out-of-domain.
-
Rating for Parents: Predicting Children Suitability Rating for Movies Based on Language of the Movies
A script-only model with attention, genre, and emotion features predicts MPAA ratings with a weighted F1 of 78.03%, beating a threshold baseline, an SVM, and a CNN.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.