REVIEW 3 cited by
The duality structure gradient descent algorithm: analysis and applications to neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The training of machine learning models is typically carried out using some form of gradient descent, often with great success. However, non-asymptotic analyses of first-order optimization algorithms typically employ a gradient smoothness assumption (formally, Lipschitz continuity of the gradient) that is too strong to be applicable in the case of deep neural networks. To address this, we propose an algorithm named duality structure gradient descent (DSGD) that is amenable to non-asymptotic performance analysis, under mild assumptions on the training set and network architecture. The algorithm can be viewed as a form of layer-wise coordinate descent, where at each iteration the algorithm chooses one layer of the network to update. The decision of what layer to update is done in a greedy fashion, based on a rigorous lower bound on the improvement of the objective function for each choice of layer. In the analysis, we bound the time required to reach approximate stationary points, in both the deterministic and stochastic settings. The convergence is measured in terms of a parameter-dependent family of norms that is derived from the network architecture and designed to confirm a smoothness-like property on the gradient of the training loss function. We empirically demonstrate the behavior of DSGD in several neural network training scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Training Transformers with Enforced Lipschitz Constants
Transformers can be trained with enforced spectral-norm constraints throughout training, but competitive accuracy requires an astronomical Lipschitz upper bound.
-
SOAP, Muon, and Beyond: Pushing LLM Pretraining Scales
SOAP and Muon, stabilized by per-step QR eigenbasis updates and KL-Shampoo covariance accumulation, beat AdamW on large-batch LLM pretraining up to 100M-token batches.
-
Convergence Bound and Critical Batch Size of Muon Optimizer
Muon's four momentum and weight-decay variants are proven to converge with bounded gradient norms under weight decay, and a lower-bound formula links critical batch size to momentum and weight decay.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.