Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Knock Knock, Who's There? Membership Inference on Aggregate Location Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.06145 v2 pith:DQUIPXAR submitted 2017-08-21 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords datalocationaggregateinferencemembershipattacksusedadversary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Aggregate location data is often used to support smart services and applications, e.g., generating live traffic maps or predicting visits to businesses. In this paper, we present the first study on the feasibility of membership inference attacks on aggregate location time-series. We introduce a game-based definition of the adversarial task, and cast it as a classification problem where machine learning can be used to distinguish whether or not a target user is part of the aggregates. We empirically evaluate the power of these attacks on both raw and differentially private aggregates using two mobility datasets. We find that membership inference is a serious privacy threat, and show how its effectiveness depends on the adversary's prior knowledge, the characteristics of the underlying location data, as well as the number of users and the timeframe on which aggregation is performed. Although differentially private mechanisms can indeed reduce the extent of the attacks, they also yield a significant loss in utility. Moreover, a strategic adversary mimicking the behavior of the defense mechanism can greatly limit the protection they provide. Overall, our work presents a novel methodology geared to evaluate membership inference on aggregate location data in real-world settings and can be used by providers to assess the quality of privacy protection before data release or by regulators to detect violations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Identifying Pre-training Data in LLMs: A Neuron Activation-Based Detection Framework

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    NA-PDD detects pre-training data in LLMs by comparing which neurons activate for a test text against neurons linked to known training versus non-training texts, and claims large AUC improvements on three benchmarks.

  2. Privacy of Groups in Dense Street Imagery

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Face-blurred street imagery still leaks group memberships: a YOLO detector trained from VLM labels mapped food truck and delivery worker hotspots across 25 million NYC dashcam images.

  3. DeSIA: Attribute Inference Attacks Against Limited Fixed Aggregate Statistics

    cs.CR 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeSIA infers sensitive attributes from limited fixed aggregate statistics by first checking whether a value is uniquely forced by the counts, then using a shadow-model classifier, outperforming reconstruction baseline...

  4. CLMIA: Membership Inference Attacks via Unsupervised Contrastive Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLMIA is a membership inference attack that pretrains an attack model on unlabeled classifier posteriors via contrastive learning and fine-tunes it with a small labeled set.

Pith tools