Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Deep Learning Techniques for Music Generation -- A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.01620 v4 pith:ZIBMWML6 submitted 2017-09-05 cs.SD cs.LG

classification cs.SDcs.LG
keywords exampleswhatanalysisdeepfeedforwardgenerationmusicalnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is a survey and an analysis of different ways of using deep learning (deep artificial neural networks) to generate musical content. We propose a methodology based on five dimensions for our analysis: Objective - What musical content is to be generated? Examples are: melody, polyphony, accompaniment or counterpoint. - For what destination and for what use? To be performed by a human(s) (in the case of a musical score), or by a machine (in the case of an audio file). Representation - What are the concepts to be manipulated? Examples are: waveform, spectrogram, note, chord, meter and beat. - What format is to be used? Examples are: MIDI, piano roll or text. - How will the representation be encoded? Examples are: scalar, one-hot or many-hot. Architecture - What type(s) of deep neural network is (are) to be used? Examples are: feedforward network, recurrent network, autoencoder or generative adversarial networks. Challenge - What are the limitations and open challenges? Examples are: variability, interactivity and creativity. Strategy - How do we model and control the process of generation? Examples are: single-step feedforward, iterative feedforward, sampling or input manipulation. For each dimension, we conduct a comparative analysis of various models and techniques and we propose some tentative multidimensional typology. This typology is bottom-up, based on the analysis of many existing deep-learning based systems for music generation selected from the relevant literature. These systems are described and are used to exemplify the various choices of objective, representation, architecture, challenge and strategy. The last section includes some discussion and some prospects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CompLex: Music Theory Lexicon Constructed by Autonomous Agents for Automatic Music Generation

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM pipeline autonomously constructs a music theory lexicon that, when used to enrich prompts, improves text-to-music generation across symbolic and audio models.

  2. Quantum-Inspired Harmonic Decision Models: A Computational Framework for Music Generation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A classical interference-based search plus tonal-harmony post-processing produces lower-density, more stable chord sequences than the raw search alone on two example melodies.

  3. On Parallelism in Music and Language: A Perspective from Symbol Emergence Systems based on Probabilistic Generative Models

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This paper proposes that the meaning of music emerges from interoceptive predictive coding within a multi-agent symbol emergence system, parallel to language.

  4. Designing Maintainable Hybrid Generative Systems: A Quantum-Inspired Approach to Automated Music Harmony Generation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A rule-based optimization layer applied to a quantum-inspired candidate-search harmonizer reduces bass jumps and segment variability while preserving ~58% functional agreement with reference harmonizations on 11 melodies.

Pith tools