Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Natural Language Inference Models Enhanced with External Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.04289 v3 pith:EKS4DE3R submitted 2017-11-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsinferenceknowledgelanguagenaturaldataexternalneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Modeling natural language inference is a very challenging task. With the availability of large annotated data, it has recently become feasible to train complex models such as neural-network-based inference models, which have shown to achieve the state-of-the-art performance. Although there exist relatively large annotated data, can machines learn all knowledge needed to perform natural language inference (NLI) from these data? If not, how can neural-network-based NLI models benefit from external knowledge and how to build NLI models to leverage it? In this paper, we enrich the state-of-the-art neural natural language inference models with external knowledge. We demonstrate that the proposed models improve neural NLI models to achieve the state-of-the-art performance on the SNLI and MultiNLI datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Knowledge Enhanced Attention for Robust Natural Language Inference

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Injecting WordNet lexical relations as bias terms into multi-head attention improves accuracy on the adversarial SNLI test set, with BERT reaching 94.1%, equal to estimated human performance.

Pith tools