REVIEW 3 cited by
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks with jet constituents for boosted top tagging at the LHC
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multivariate techniques based on engineered features have found wide adoption in the identification of jets resulting from hadronic top decays at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Recent Deep Learning developments in this area include the treatment of the calorimeter activation as an image or supplying a list of jet constituent momenta to a fully connected network. This latter approach lends itself well to the use of Recurrent Neural Networks. In this work the applicability of architectures incorporating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks is explored. Several network architectures, methods of ordering of jet constituents, and input pre-processing are studied. The best performing LSTM network achieves a background rejection of 100 for 50% signal efficiency. This represents more than a factor of two improvement over a fully connected Deep Neural Network (DNN) trained on similar types of inputs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Jet Quenching Identification via Supervised Learning in Simulated Heavy-Ion Collisions
Sequential ML models classify quenched jets with >93% accuracy and show sensitivity to medium implementation details that traditional observables miss.
-
Scaling Particle Collision Data Analysis
A byte-level transformer trained from scratch on simulated collider data matches specialized jet-tagging models when given enough training examples.
-
Exploring AI Text Generation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Detection Technologies: a Comprehensive Overview
A descriptive review of AI text generation, RAG, and AI text detection tools, based on cited literature and vendor descriptions, with ethical discussion.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.