REVIEW 1 cited by
Toward an understanding of GRB prompt emission mechanism: II. Patterns of peak energy evolution and their connection to spectral lags
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The prompt emission phase of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits two distinct patterns of the peak-energy ($E_p$) evolution, i.e., time-resolved spectral analyses of $\nu F_{\nu}$ spectra of broad pulses reveal (1) "hard-to-soft" and (2) "flux-tracking" patterns of $E_p$ evolution in time, the physical origin of which still remains not well understood. We show here that these two patterns can be successfully reproduced within a simple physical model invoking synchrotron radiation in a bulk-accelerating emission region. We show further that the evolution patterns of the peak energy have, in fact, direct connections to the existence of two different (positive or negative) types of spectral lags, seen in the broad pulses. In particular, we predict that (1) only the positive type of spectral lags is possible for the hard-to-soft evolution of the peak energy, (2) both the positive and negative type of spectral lags can occur in the case of flux-tracking pattern of the peak energy, (3) for the flux-tracking pattern, the peak location of the flux light curve slightly lags behind the peak of the $E_p$ evolution with time if the spectral lags are positive, and (4) in the case of flux-tracking pattern, double-peaked broad pulses can appear in the light curves, the shape of which is energy-dependent.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Duration of Gamma-Ray Bursts
GRB duration is shaped by the progenitor, the central engine, the emitter, and geometry, so short versus long duration is not a reliable direct indicator of what exploded or merged.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.